Cargando…

3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an image-navigated isotropic high-resolution 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prototype sequence with compressed sensing and Dixon water-fat separation in a clinical routine setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac MRI were enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeilinger, Martin Georg, Wiesmüller, Marco, Forman, Christoph, Schmidt, Michaela, Munoz, Camila, Piccini, Davide, Kunze, Karl-Philipp, Neji, Radhouene, Botnar, René Michael, Prieto, Claudia, Uder, Michael, May, Matthias, Wuest, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07517-x
_version_ 1783694184484438016
author Zeilinger, Martin Georg
Wiesmüller, Marco
Forman, Christoph
Schmidt, Michaela
Munoz, Camila
Piccini, Davide
Kunze, Karl-Philipp
Neji, Radhouene
Botnar, René Michael
Prieto, Claudia
Uder, Michael
May, Matthias
Wuest, Wolfgang
author_facet Zeilinger, Martin Georg
Wiesmüller, Marco
Forman, Christoph
Schmidt, Michaela
Munoz, Camila
Piccini, Davide
Kunze, Karl-Philipp
Neji, Radhouene
Botnar, René Michael
Prieto, Claudia
Uder, Michael
May, Matthias
Wuest, Wolfgang
author_sort Zeilinger, Martin Georg
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an image-navigated isotropic high-resolution 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prototype sequence with compressed sensing and Dixon water-fat separation in a clinical routine setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac MRI were enrolled prospectively and examined with 1.5 T MRI. Overall subjective image quality, LGE pattern and extent, diagnostic confidence for detection of LGE, and scan time were evaluated and compared to standard 2D LGE imaging. Robustness of Dixon fat suppression was evaluated for 3D Dixon LGE imaging. For statistical analysis, the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed. RESULTS: LGE was rated as ischemic in 9 patients and non-ischemic in 11 patients while it was absent in 20 patients. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were comparable between both techniques (p = 0.67 and p = 0.66, respectively). LGE extent with respect to segmental or transmural myocardial enhancement was identical between 2D and 3D (water-only and in-phase). LGE size was comparable (3D 8.4 ± 7.2 g, 2D 8.7 ± 7.3 g, p = 0.19). Good or excellent fat suppression was achieved in 93% of the 3D LGE datasets. In 6 patients with pericarditis, the 3D sequence with Dixon fat suppression allowed for a better detection of pericardial LGE. Scan duration was significantly longer for 3D imaging (2D median 9:32 min vs. 3D median 10:46 min, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The 3D LGE sequence provides comparable LGE detection compared to 2D imaging and seems to be superior in evaluating the extent of pericardial involvement in patients suspected with pericarditis due to the robust Dixon fat suppression. KEY POINTS: • Three-dimensional LGE imaging provides high-resolution detection of myocardial scarring. • Robust Dixon water-fat separation aids in the assessment of pericardial disease. • The 2D image navigator technique enables 100% respiratory scan efficacy and permits predictable scan times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81288572021-05-24 3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI Zeilinger, Martin Georg Wiesmüller, Marco Forman, Christoph Schmidt, Michaela Munoz, Camila Piccini, Davide Kunze, Karl-Philipp Neji, Radhouene Botnar, René Michael Prieto, Claudia Uder, Michael May, Matthias Wuest, Wolfgang Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an image-navigated isotropic high-resolution 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prototype sequence with compressed sensing and Dixon water-fat separation in a clinical routine setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac MRI were enrolled prospectively and examined with 1.5 T MRI. Overall subjective image quality, LGE pattern and extent, diagnostic confidence for detection of LGE, and scan time were evaluated and compared to standard 2D LGE imaging. Robustness of Dixon fat suppression was evaluated for 3D Dixon LGE imaging. For statistical analysis, the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed. RESULTS: LGE was rated as ischemic in 9 patients and non-ischemic in 11 patients while it was absent in 20 patients. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were comparable between both techniques (p = 0.67 and p = 0.66, respectively). LGE extent with respect to segmental or transmural myocardial enhancement was identical between 2D and 3D (water-only and in-phase). LGE size was comparable (3D 8.4 ± 7.2 g, 2D 8.7 ± 7.3 g, p = 0.19). Good or excellent fat suppression was achieved in 93% of the 3D LGE datasets. In 6 patients with pericarditis, the 3D sequence with Dixon fat suppression allowed for a better detection of pericardial LGE. Scan duration was significantly longer for 3D imaging (2D median 9:32 min vs. 3D median 10:46 min, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The 3D LGE sequence provides comparable LGE detection compared to 2D imaging and seems to be superior in evaluating the extent of pericardial involvement in patients suspected with pericarditis due to the robust Dixon fat suppression. KEY POINTS: • Three-dimensional LGE imaging provides high-resolution detection of myocardial scarring. • Robust Dixon water-fat separation aids in the assessment of pericardial disease. • The 2D image navigator technique enables 100% respiratory scan efficacy and permits predictable scan times. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8128857/ /pubmed/33263160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07517-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiac
Zeilinger, Martin Georg
Wiesmüller, Marco
Forman, Christoph
Schmidt, Michaela
Munoz, Camila
Piccini, Davide
Kunze, Karl-Philipp
Neji, Radhouene
Botnar, René Michael
Prieto, Claudia
Uder, Michael
May, Matthias
Wuest, Wolfgang
3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI
title 3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI
title_full 3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI
title_fullStr 3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI
title_full_unstemmed 3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI
title_short 3D Dixon water-fat LGE imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac MRI
title_sort 3d dixon water-fat lge imaging with image navigator and compressed sensing in cardiac mri
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07517-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zeilingermartingeorg 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT wiesmullermarco 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT formanchristoph 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT schmidtmichaela 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT munozcamila 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT piccinidavide 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT kunzekarlphilipp 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT nejiradhouene 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT botnarrenemichael 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT prietoclaudia 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT udermichael 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT maymatthias 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri
AT wuestwolfgang 3ddixonwaterfatlgeimagingwithimagenavigatorandcompressedsensingincardiacmri