Cargando…

Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species

Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. The majori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markowski, Marcin, Minias, Piotr, Bańbura, Mirosława, Glądalski, Michał, Kaliński, Adam, Skwarska, Joanna, Wawrzyniak, Jarosław, Zieliński, Piotr, Bańbura, Jerzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89847-4
_version_ 1783694184967831552
author Markowski, Marcin
Minias, Piotr
Bańbura, Mirosława
Glądalski, Michał
Kaliński, Adam
Skwarska, Joanna
Wawrzyniak, Jarosław
Zieliński, Piotr
Bańbura, Jerzy
author_facet Markowski, Marcin
Minias, Piotr
Bańbura, Mirosława
Glądalski, Michał
Kaliński, Adam
Skwarska, Joanna
Wawrzyniak, Jarosław
Zieliński, Piotr
Bańbura, Jerzy
author_sort Markowski, Marcin
collection PubMed
description Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. The majority of population genetic studies focus on single species, which inflicts limitations for direct comparisons of genetic responses of avian populations to urbanization. Here, we used a set of microsatellite markers to examine genetic diversity, gene flow and population structure in two common parid species, great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus occupying three sites in habitats with contrasting urbanization level in central Poland. We found low but significant divergence of urban park population with both suburban and non-urban forest great tit populations, while no differentiation was found between suburban forest and non-urban forest populations. In contrast, no evidence for genetic differentiation was found between blue tit populations from the urban park, suburban forest and non-urban forest sites. We conclude that great tits and blue tits respond to urbanization-related changes in a different way, which may be a result of different rates of migration and/or dispersal, likely higher in blue tits. Some impact may be also induced by interspecific competition. We suggest that changing the focus of urban genetic research from single to multiple species may provide novel insights into how natural populations respond to the processes of urbanization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8128859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81288592021-05-19 Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species Markowski, Marcin Minias, Piotr Bańbura, Mirosława Glądalski, Michał Kaliński, Adam Skwarska, Joanna Wawrzyniak, Jarosław Zieliński, Piotr Bańbura, Jerzy Sci Rep Article Landscape conversions induced by human activities can affect dispersal patterns of various bird species and, as a result, affect genetic structure of their populations. Genetic differentiation of bird populations may be enhanced by habitat variation, especially in urban-non-urban systems. The majority of population genetic studies focus on single species, which inflicts limitations for direct comparisons of genetic responses of avian populations to urbanization. Here, we used a set of microsatellite markers to examine genetic diversity, gene flow and population structure in two common parid species, great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus occupying three sites in habitats with contrasting urbanization level in central Poland. We found low but significant divergence of urban park population with both suburban and non-urban forest great tit populations, while no differentiation was found between suburban forest and non-urban forest populations. In contrast, no evidence for genetic differentiation was found between blue tit populations from the urban park, suburban forest and non-urban forest sites. We conclude that great tits and blue tits respond to urbanization-related changes in a different way, which may be a result of different rates of migration and/or dispersal, likely higher in blue tits. Some impact may be also induced by interspecific competition. We suggest that changing the focus of urban genetic research from single to multiple species may provide novel insights into how natural populations respond to the processes of urbanization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8128859/ /pubmed/34001959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89847-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Markowski, Marcin
Minias, Piotr
Bańbura, Mirosława
Glądalski, Michał
Kaliński, Adam
Skwarska, Joanna
Wawrzyniak, Jarosław
Zieliński, Piotr
Bańbura, Jerzy
Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_full Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_fullStr Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_full_unstemmed Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_short Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
title_sort genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89847-4
work_keys_str_mv AT markowskimarcin geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT miniaspiotr geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT banburamirosława geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT gladalskimichał geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT kalinskiadam geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT skwarskajoanna geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT wawrzyniakjarosław geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT zielinskipiotr geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies
AT banburajerzy geneticstructureofurbanandnonurbanpopulationsdiffersbetweentwocommonparidspecies