Cargando…

LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes

Experimental data showed that endothelial lipase (LIPG) is a crucial player in breast cancer. However, very limited data exists on the role of LIPG on the risk of breast cancer in humans. We examined the LIPG-breast cancer association within our population-based case–control study from Galicia, Spai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Redondo, Carmen M., Calaza, Manuel, Matabuena, Marcos, Bermudez, Maria A., Perez-Fernandez, Roman, Torres-Español, María, Carracedo, Ángel, Castelao, J. Esteban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89669-4
_version_ 1783694247595081728
author Gago-Dominguez, Manuela
Redondo, Carmen M.
Calaza, Manuel
Matabuena, Marcos
Bermudez, Maria A.
Perez-Fernandez, Roman
Torres-Español, María
Carracedo, Ángel
Castelao, J. Esteban
author_facet Gago-Dominguez, Manuela
Redondo, Carmen M.
Calaza, Manuel
Matabuena, Marcos
Bermudez, Maria A.
Perez-Fernandez, Roman
Torres-Español, María
Carracedo, Ángel
Castelao, J. Esteban
author_sort Gago-Dominguez, Manuela
collection PubMed
description Experimental data showed that endothelial lipase (LIPG) is a crucial player in breast cancer. However, very limited data exists on the role of LIPG on the risk of breast cancer in humans. We examined the LIPG-breast cancer association within our population-based case–control study from Galicia, Spain, BREOGAN (BREast Oncology GAlicia Network). Plasma LIPG and/or OxLDL were measured on 114 breast cancer cases and 82 controls from our case–control study, and were included in the present study. The risk of breast cancer increased with increasing levels of LIPG (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) 2.52 (1.11–5.81), P-trend = 0.037). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Pre-menopausal breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.76 (0.94–28.77), P-trend = 0.06, and 1.79 (0.61–5.29), P-trend = 0.372, for Pre-menopausal and Post-menopausal breast cancer, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Luminal A breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.70 (1.42–10.16), P-trend = 0.015, and 2.05 (0.63–7.22), P-trend = 0.311, for Luminal A and non-Luminal A breast cancers, respectively). Subset analysis only based on HER2 receptor indicated that the LIPG-breast cancer relationship was restricted to HER2-negative breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.39 (1.70–12.03), P-trend = 0.012, and 1.10 (0.28–4.32), P-trend = 0.745, for HER2-negative and HER2-positive tumors, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to women with high total cholesterol levels (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 6.30 (2.13–20.05), P-trend = 0.018, and 0.65 (0.11–3.28), P-trend = 0.786, among women with high and low cholesterol levels, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was also restricted to non-postpartum breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.83 (1.37–11.39), P-trend = 0.003, and 2.35 (0.16–63.65), P-trend = 0.396, for non-postpartum and postpartum breast cancer, respectively), although we lacked precision. The LIPG-breast cancer association was more pronounced among grades II and III than grade I breast cancers (Multivariable ORs for the highest category of LIPG (95% CI) 2.73 (1.02–7.69), P-trend = 0.057, and 1.90 (0.61–6.21), P-trend = 0.170, for grades II and III, and grade I breast cancers, respectively). No association was detected for OxLDL levels and breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest versus the lowest category (95% CI) 1.56 (0.56–4.32), P-trend = 0.457).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81291302021-05-19 LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes Gago-Dominguez, Manuela Redondo, Carmen M. Calaza, Manuel Matabuena, Marcos Bermudez, Maria A. Perez-Fernandez, Roman Torres-Español, María Carracedo, Ángel Castelao, J. Esteban Sci Rep Article Experimental data showed that endothelial lipase (LIPG) is a crucial player in breast cancer. However, very limited data exists on the role of LIPG on the risk of breast cancer in humans. We examined the LIPG-breast cancer association within our population-based case–control study from Galicia, Spain, BREOGAN (BREast Oncology GAlicia Network). Plasma LIPG and/or OxLDL were measured on 114 breast cancer cases and 82 controls from our case–control study, and were included in the present study. The risk of breast cancer increased with increasing levels of LIPG (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) 2.52 (1.11–5.81), P-trend = 0.037). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Pre-menopausal breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.76 (0.94–28.77), P-trend = 0.06, and 1.79 (0.61–5.29), P-trend = 0.372, for Pre-menopausal and Post-menopausal breast cancer, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to Luminal A breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.70 (1.42–10.16), P-trend = 0.015, and 2.05 (0.63–7.22), P-trend = 0.311, for Luminal A and non-Luminal A breast cancers, respectively). Subset analysis only based on HER2 receptor indicated that the LIPG-breast cancer relationship was restricted to HER2-negative breast cancers (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 4.39 (1.70–12.03), P-trend = 0.012, and 1.10 (0.28–4.32), P-trend = 0.745, for HER2-negative and HER2-positive tumors, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was restricted to women with high total cholesterol levels (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 6.30 (2.13–20.05), P-trend = 0.018, and 0.65 (0.11–3.28), P-trend = 0.786, among women with high and low cholesterol levels, respectively). The LIPG-breast cancer association was also restricted to non-postpartum breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest LIPG category (95% CI) 3.83 (1.37–11.39), P-trend = 0.003, and 2.35 (0.16–63.65), P-trend = 0.396, for non-postpartum and postpartum breast cancer, respectively), although we lacked precision. The LIPG-breast cancer association was more pronounced among grades II and III than grade I breast cancers (Multivariable ORs for the highest category of LIPG (95% CI) 2.73 (1.02–7.69), P-trend = 0.057, and 1.90 (0.61–6.21), P-trend = 0.170, for grades II and III, and grade I breast cancers, respectively). No association was detected for OxLDL levels and breast cancer (Multivariable OR for the highest versus the lowest category (95% CI) 1.56 (0.56–4.32), P-trend = 0.457). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8129130/ /pubmed/34001944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89669-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gago-Dominguez, Manuela
Redondo, Carmen M.
Calaza, Manuel
Matabuena, Marcos
Bermudez, Maria A.
Perez-Fernandez, Roman
Torres-Español, María
Carracedo, Ángel
Castelao, J. Esteban
LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_full LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_fullStr LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_full_unstemmed LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_short LIPG endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
title_sort lipg endothelial lipase and breast cancer risk by subtypes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89669-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gagodominguezmanuela lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT redondocarmenm lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT calazamanuel lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT matabuenamarcos lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT bermudezmariaa lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT perezfernandezroman lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT torresespanolmaria lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT carracedoangel lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes
AT castelaojesteban lipgendotheliallipaseandbreastcancerriskbysubtypes