Cargando…
The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces
3D printing technology has been gradually applied to various areas. In the present study, 3D-printed implants were fabricated with direct metal laser sintering technique for a dental single root with titanium. The 3D implants were allocated into following groups: not treated (3D-None), sandblasted w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3 |
_version_ | 1783694255436333056 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jungwon Lee, Jun-Beom Yun, Junseob Rhyu, In-Chul Lee, Yong-Moo Lee, Sung-Mi Lee, Min-Kyu Kim, Byoungkook Kim, Pangyu Koo, Ki-Tae |
author_facet | Lee, Jungwon Lee, Jun-Beom Yun, Junseob Rhyu, In-Chul Lee, Yong-Moo Lee, Sung-Mi Lee, Min-Kyu Kim, Byoungkook Kim, Pangyu Koo, Ki-Tae |
author_sort | Lee, Jungwon |
collection | PubMed |
description | 3D printing technology has been gradually applied to various areas. In the present study, 3D-printed implants were fabricated with direct metal laser sintering technique for a dental single root with titanium. The 3D implants were allocated into following groups: not treated (3D-None), sandblasted with a large grit and acid-etched (3D-SLA), and target-ion-induced plasma-sputtered surface (3D-TIPS). Two holes were drilled in each tibia of rabbit, and the three groups of implants were randomly placed with a mallet. Rabbits were sacrificed at two, four, and twelve weeks after the surgery. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses were performed for the evaluation of mineralized bone-to-implant contact (mBIC), osteoid-to-implant contact (OIC), total bone-to-implant contact (tBIC), mineralized bone area fraction occupancy (mBAFO), osteoid area fraction occupancy (OAFO), and total bone area fraction occupancy (tBAFO) in the inner and outer areas of lattice structure. At two weeks, 3D-TIPS showed significantly higher inner and outer tBIC and inner tBAFO compared with other groups. At four weeks, 3D-TIPS showed significantly higher outer OIC than 3D-SLA, but there were no significant differences in other variables. At twelve weeks, there were no significant differences. The surface treatment with TIPS in 3D-printed implants could enhance the osseointegration process in the rabbit tibia model, meaning that earlier osseointegration could be achieved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8129142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81291422021-05-19 The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces Lee, Jungwon Lee, Jun-Beom Yun, Junseob Rhyu, In-Chul Lee, Yong-Moo Lee, Sung-Mi Lee, Min-Kyu Kim, Byoungkook Kim, Pangyu Koo, Ki-Tae Sci Rep Article 3D printing technology has been gradually applied to various areas. In the present study, 3D-printed implants were fabricated with direct metal laser sintering technique for a dental single root with titanium. The 3D implants were allocated into following groups: not treated (3D-None), sandblasted with a large grit and acid-etched (3D-SLA), and target-ion-induced plasma-sputtered surface (3D-TIPS). Two holes were drilled in each tibia of rabbit, and the three groups of implants were randomly placed with a mallet. Rabbits were sacrificed at two, four, and twelve weeks after the surgery. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses were performed for the evaluation of mineralized bone-to-implant contact (mBIC), osteoid-to-implant contact (OIC), total bone-to-implant contact (tBIC), mineralized bone area fraction occupancy (mBAFO), osteoid area fraction occupancy (OAFO), and total bone area fraction occupancy (tBAFO) in the inner and outer areas of lattice structure. At two weeks, 3D-TIPS showed significantly higher inner and outer tBIC and inner tBAFO compared with other groups. At four weeks, 3D-TIPS showed significantly higher outer OIC than 3D-SLA, but there were no significant differences in other variables. At twelve weeks, there were no significant differences. The surface treatment with TIPS in 3D-printed implants could enhance the osseointegration process in the rabbit tibia model, meaning that earlier osseointegration could be achieved. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8129142/ /pubmed/34001989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Jungwon Lee, Jun-Beom Yun, Junseob Rhyu, In-Chul Lee, Yong-Moo Lee, Sung-Mi Lee, Min-Kyu Kim, Byoungkook Kim, Pangyu Koo, Ki-Tae The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
title | The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
title_full | The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
title_fullStr | The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
title_short | The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
title_sort | impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejungwon theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leejunbeom theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT yunjunseob theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT rhyuinchul theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leeyongmoo theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leesungmi theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leeminkyu theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT kimbyoungkook theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT kimpangyu theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT kookitae theimpactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leejungwon impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leejunbeom impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT yunjunseob impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT rhyuinchul impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leeyongmoo impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leesungmi impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT leeminkyu impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT kimbyoungkook impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT kimpangyu impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces AT kookitae impactofsurfacetreatmentin3dimensionalprintedimplantsforearlyosseointegrationacomparisonstudyofthreedifferentsurfaces |