Cargando…

The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between functional outcome scores and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moorthy, Vikaesh, Chen, Jerry Yongqiang, Lee, Merrill, Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong, Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.003
_version_ 1783694281182019584
author Moorthy, Vikaesh
Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
Lee, Merrill
Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
author_facet Moorthy, Vikaesh
Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
Lee, Merrill
Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
author_sort Moorthy, Vikaesh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between functional outcome scores and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2015. University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLASS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were measured before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups at each follow-up: (1) those with successful treatment and (2) those with unsuccessful treatment. Treatment success was defined as simultaneous fulfilment of 3 criteria: clinically significant improvement in pain, expectations for surgery met, and patient satisfied with surgery. RESULTS: A total of 214 subjects met the inclusion criteria. UCLASS was a consistent significant predictor of treatment success at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.192, P = .005, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.054-1.348), 12 months (OR 1.274, P < .001, 95% CI 1.153-1.406), and 24 months (OR 1.266, P < .001, 95% CI 1.162-1.380). Lower preoperative CSS was significant in predicting treatment success at 6 months (OR 0.952, P = .001, 95% CI 0.926-0.979), while larger tear size was significant in predicting treatment success at 24 months (OR 1.773, P = .043, 95% CI 1.019-3.083). CONCLUSION: UCLASS is a better tool for predicting treatment success than CSS and OSS in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, up to a minimum of 24 months’ follow-up. A holistic assessment of shoulder function, taking into account both subjective and objective evaluation of function, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, is important in determining treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81294352021-05-21 The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study Moorthy, Vikaesh Chen, Jerry Yongqiang Lee, Merrill Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between functional outcome scores and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2015. University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLASS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were measured before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups at each follow-up: (1) those with successful treatment and (2) those with unsuccessful treatment. Treatment success was defined as simultaneous fulfilment of 3 criteria: clinically significant improvement in pain, expectations for surgery met, and patient satisfied with surgery. RESULTS: A total of 214 subjects met the inclusion criteria. UCLASS was a consistent significant predictor of treatment success at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.192, P = .005, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.054-1.348), 12 months (OR 1.274, P < .001, 95% CI 1.153-1.406), and 24 months (OR 1.266, P < .001, 95% CI 1.162-1.380). Lower preoperative CSS was significant in predicting treatment success at 6 months (OR 0.952, P = .001, 95% CI 0.926-0.979), while larger tear size was significant in predicting treatment success at 24 months (OR 1.773, P = .043, 95% CI 1.019-3.083). CONCLUSION: UCLASS is a better tool for predicting treatment success than CSS and OSS in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, up to a minimum of 24 months’ follow-up. A holistic assessment of shoulder function, taking into account both subjective and objective evaluation of function, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, is important in determining treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study. Elsevier 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8129435/ /pubmed/34027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.003 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Moorthy, Vikaesh
Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
Lee, Merrill
Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
title The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort ucla shoulder score is a better predictor of treatment success than the constant and oxford shoulder scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year follow-up study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT moorthyvikaesh theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT chenjerryyongqiang theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT leemerrill theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT angbenjaminfuhong theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT liedennytjiauwtjoen theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT moorthyvikaesh uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT chenjerryyongqiang uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT leemerrill uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT angbenjaminfuhong uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy
AT liedennytjiauwtjoen uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy