Cargando…
The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between functional outcome scores and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.003 |
_version_ | 1783694281182019584 |
---|---|
author | Moorthy, Vikaesh Chen, Jerry Yongqiang Lee, Merrill Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen |
author_facet | Moorthy, Vikaesh Chen, Jerry Yongqiang Lee, Merrill Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen |
author_sort | Moorthy, Vikaesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between functional outcome scores and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2015. University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLASS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were measured before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups at each follow-up: (1) those with successful treatment and (2) those with unsuccessful treatment. Treatment success was defined as simultaneous fulfilment of 3 criteria: clinically significant improvement in pain, expectations for surgery met, and patient satisfied with surgery. RESULTS: A total of 214 subjects met the inclusion criteria. UCLASS was a consistent significant predictor of treatment success at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.192, P = .005, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.054-1.348), 12 months (OR 1.274, P < .001, 95% CI 1.153-1.406), and 24 months (OR 1.266, P < .001, 95% CI 1.162-1.380). Lower preoperative CSS was significant in predicting treatment success at 6 months (OR 0.952, P = .001, 95% CI 0.926-0.979), while larger tear size was significant in predicting treatment success at 24 months (OR 1.773, P = .043, 95% CI 1.019-3.083). CONCLUSION: UCLASS is a better tool for predicting treatment success than CSS and OSS in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, up to a minimum of 24 months’ follow-up. A holistic assessment of shoulder function, taking into account both subjective and objective evaluation of function, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, is important in determining treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8129435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81294352021-05-21 The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study Moorthy, Vikaesh Chen, Jerry Yongqiang Lee, Merrill Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between functional outcome scores and treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral rotator cuff repair at a tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2015. University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLASS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were measured before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups at each follow-up: (1) those with successful treatment and (2) those with unsuccessful treatment. Treatment success was defined as simultaneous fulfilment of 3 criteria: clinically significant improvement in pain, expectations for surgery met, and patient satisfied with surgery. RESULTS: A total of 214 subjects met the inclusion criteria. UCLASS was a consistent significant predictor of treatment success at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.192, P = .005, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.054-1.348), 12 months (OR 1.274, P < .001, 95% CI 1.153-1.406), and 24 months (OR 1.266, P < .001, 95% CI 1.162-1.380). Lower preoperative CSS was significant in predicting treatment success at 6 months (OR 0.952, P = .001, 95% CI 0.926-0.979), while larger tear size was significant in predicting treatment success at 24 months (OR 1.773, P = .043, 95% CI 1.019-3.083). CONCLUSION: UCLASS is a better tool for predicting treatment success than CSS and OSS in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, up to a minimum of 24 months’ follow-up. A holistic assessment of shoulder function, taking into account both subjective and objective evaluation of function, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, is important in determining treatment success after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study. Elsevier 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8129435/ /pubmed/34027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.003 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moorthy, Vikaesh Chen, Jerry Yongqiang Lee, Merrill Ang, Benjamin Fu Hong Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study |
title | The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_full | The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_fullStr | The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_short | The UCLA Shoulder Score Is a Better Predictor of Treatment Success Than the Constant and Oxford Shoulder Scores After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_sort | ucla shoulder score is a better predictor of treatment success than the constant and oxford shoulder scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year follow-up study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorthyvikaesh theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT chenjerryyongqiang theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT leemerrill theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT angbenjaminfuhong theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT liedennytjiauwtjoen theuclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT moorthyvikaesh uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT chenjerryyongqiang uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT leemerrill uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT angbenjaminfuhong uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy AT liedennytjiauwtjoen uclashoulderscoreisabetterpredictoroftreatmentsuccessthantheconstantandoxfordshoulderscoresafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepaira2yearfollowupstudy |