Cargando…

Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction

PURPOSE: To determine whether combined acromioclavicular (AC) ligament reconstruction and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction without bone tunnels would improve radiographic reduction maintenance and complication rates for type III to V AC dislocations. METHODS: This single-institution ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walters, Jordan D., Ignozzi, Anthony, Bustos, Francis, Werner, Brian C., Brockmeier, Stephen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.10.009
_version_ 1783694290450382848
author Walters, Jordan D.
Ignozzi, Anthony
Bustos, Francis
Werner, Brian C.
Brockmeier, Stephen F.
author_facet Walters, Jordan D.
Ignozzi, Anthony
Bustos, Francis
Werner, Brian C.
Brockmeier, Stephen F.
author_sort Walters, Jordan D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine whether combined acromioclavicular (AC) ligament reconstruction and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction without bone tunnels would improve radiographic reduction maintenance and complication rates for type III to V AC dislocations. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study analyzed all patients who underwent a hybrid synthetic/graft wrap CC reconstruction without tunnels with additional AC reconstruction/repair from January 2013 to August 2019. This 26-patient cohort was compared with a 1:1 sex- and age-matched control group who underwent CC reconstruction without AC reconstruction. CC distances on postoperative radiographs were compared with normal contralateral shoulders. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients who underwent AC reconstructive surgery during this time period, 26 patients (96% male) met the inclusion criteria. The AC/CC cohort had 23.5% type III injuries, 23.1% type IV injuries, and 53.8% type V injuries, similar to the control group. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s CC distance were (mean ± standard deviation) 0.9 ± 4.0 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (9.6 ± 8.7 mm) in the AC/CC cohort. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s coracoclavicular distance were 4.0 ± 4.7 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (13.3 ± 9.3 mm) in the CC control group, a significant difference (P = .014). The AC/CC reconstruction group had fewer patients with a loss of reduction >5 mm (11.5% versus 38.5%, P = .025). The complication rate in the CC control group was higher than in the AC/CC cohort (30.7% versus 7.7%, P = .035). The reoperation rate was also greater in the CC control group (8 versus 1, P = .010). CONCLUSION: This cohort study shows that the addition of AC reconstruction to CC reconstruction using synthetic tapes/grafts or allograft tissues without bone tunnels significantly improves durable radiographic outcomes, diminishes complication rates, and improves reoperation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81294512021-05-21 Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Walters, Jordan D. Ignozzi, Anthony Bustos, Francis Werner, Brian C. Brockmeier, Stephen F. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether combined acromioclavicular (AC) ligament reconstruction and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction without bone tunnels would improve radiographic reduction maintenance and complication rates for type III to V AC dislocations. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study analyzed all patients who underwent a hybrid synthetic/graft wrap CC reconstruction without tunnels with additional AC reconstruction/repair from January 2013 to August 2019. This 26-patient cohort was compared with a 1:1 sex- and age-matched control group who underwent CC reconstruction without AC reconstruction. CC distances on postoperative radiographs were compared with normal contralateral shoulders. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients who underwent AC reconstructive surgery during this time period, 26 patients (96% male) met the inclusion criteria. The AC/CC cohort had 23.5% type III injuries, 23.1% type IV injuries, and 53.8% type V injuries, similar to the control group. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s CC distance were (mean ± standard deviation) 0.9 ± 4.0 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (9.6 ± 8.7 mm) in the AC/CC cohort. Final radiographs of the operative shoulder’s coracoclavicular distance were 4.0 ± 4.7 mm greater than that of the contralateral shoulder (13.3 ± 9.3 mm) in the CC control group, a significant difference (P = .014). The AC/CC reconstruction group had fewer patients with a loss of reduction >5 mm (11.5% versus 38.5%, P = .025). The complication rate in the CC control group was higher than in the AC/CC cohort (30.7% versus 7.7%, P = .035). The reoperation rate was also greater in the CC control group (8 versus 1, P = .010). CONCLUSION: This cohort study shows that the addition of AC reconstruction to CC reconstruction using synthetic tapes/grafts or allograft tissues without bone tunnels significantly improves durable radiographic outcomes, diminishes complication rates, and improves reoperation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study. Elsevier 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8129451/ /pubmed/34027453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.10.009 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Walters, Jordan D.
Ignozzi, Anthony
Bustos, Francis
Werner, Brian C.
Brockmeier, Stephen F.
Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction
title Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction
title_full Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction
title_fullStr Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction
title_short Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction
title_sort better radiographic reduction and lower complication rates with combined coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction than with isolated coracoclavicular reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.10.009
work_keys_str_mv AT waltersjordand betterradiographicreductionandlowercomplicationrateswithcombinedcoracoclavicularandacromioclavicularligamentreconstructionthanwithisolatedcoracoclavicularreconstruction
AT ignozzianthony betterradiographicreductionandlowercomplicationrateswithcombinedcoracoclavicularandacromioclavicularligamentreconstructionthanwithisolatedcoracoclavicularreconstruction
AT bustosfrancis betterradiographicreductionandlowercomplicationrateswithcombinedcoracoclavicularandacromioclavicularligamentreconstructionthanwithisolatedcoracoclavicularreconstruction
AT wernerbrianc betterradiographicreductionandlowercomplicationrateswithcombinedcoracoclavicularandacromioclavicularligamentreconstructionthanwithisolatedcoracoclavicularreconstruction
AT brockmeierstephenf betterradiographicreductionandlowercomplicationrateswithcombinedcoracoclavicularandacromioclavicularligamentreconstructionthanwithisolatedcoracoclavicularreconstruction