Cargando…

The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an invaluable and underused diagnostic tool for myocardial disease. The primary indications are surveillance of cardiac allograft rejection and the diagnosis of inflammatory and infiltrative cardiomyopathies. EMB is typically performed by sampling the right ventricular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiamanesh, Omid, Toma, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.017
_version_ 1783694297851232256
author Kiamanesh, Omid
Toma, Mustafa
author_facet Kiamanesh, Omid
Toma, Mustafa
author_sort Kiamanesh, Omid
collection PubMed
description Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an invaluable and underused diagnostic tool for myocardial disease. The primary indications are surveillance of cardiac allograft rejection and the diagnosis of inflammatory and infiltrative cardiomyopathies. EMB is typically performed by sampling the right ventricular septum via the right internal jugular vein using fluoroscopic guidance. The diagnostic yield of EMB is improved by sampling both ventricles and with the use of guidance from imaging or electroanatomic mapping. The risk of major cardiac complications is operator dependent and < 1% in experienced centres. EMB is the gold standard and most common form of cardiac allograft rejection surveillance, whereas advanced cardiac imaging and donor-specific antibody quantification provide complementary information. Gene expression profiling is an alternative surveillance strategy to EMB for low-risk patients. EMB is recommended for myocarditis and can guide therapy for giant-cell myocarditis, necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis, sarcoidosis, and immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis. There is growing interest in using EMB to guide therapy for viral myocarditis, although the uptake of this approach is limited to specialized centres. EMB has been replaced as a first-line test for infiltrative cardiomyopathy by nonbiopsy diagnostic techniques, but is still useful to clarify the diagnosis or disease subtype. The miniaturization of bioptomes and advances in laboratory techniques such as microarrays promises to improve the safety and yield of EMB. We review the contemporary use of EMB for cardiac allograft rejection, inflammatory cardiomyopathy, and infiltrative cardiomyopathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81294782021-05-21 The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review Kiamanesh, Omid Toma, Mustafa CJC Open Review Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an invaluable and underused diagnostic tool for myocardial disease. The primary indications are surveillance of cardiac allograft rejection and the diagnosis of inflammatory and infiltrative cardiomyopathies. EMB is typically performed by sampling the right ventricular septum via the right internal jugular vein using fluoroscopic guidance. The diagnostic yield of EMB is improved by sampling both ventricles and with the use of guidance from imaging or electroanatomic mapping. The risk of major cardiac complications is operator dependent and < 1% in experienced centres. EMB is the gold standard and most common form of cardiac allograft rejection surveillance, whereas advanced cardiac imaging and donor-specific antibody quantification provide complementary information. Gene expression profiling is an alternative surveillance strategy to EMB for low-risk patients. EMB is recommended for myocarditis and can guide therapy for giant-cell myocarditis, necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis, sarcoidosis, and immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis. There is growing interest in using EMB to guide therapy for viral myocarditis, although the uptake of this approach is limited to specialized centres. EMB has been replaced as a first-line test for infiltrative cardiomyopathy by nonbiopsy diagnostic techniques, but is still useful to clarify the diagnosis or disease subtype. The miniaturization of bioptomes and advances in laboratory techniques such as microarrays promises to improve the safety and yield of EMB. We review the contemporary use of EMB for cardiac allograft rejection, inflammatory cardiomyopathy, and infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Elsevier 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8129478/ /pubmed/34027357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.017 Text en © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kiamanesh, Omid
Toma, Mustafa
The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review
title The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review
title_full The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review
title_fullStr The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review
title_full_unstemmed The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review
title_short The State of the Heart Biopsy: A Clinical Review
title_sort state of the heart biopsy: a clinical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.017
work_keys_str_mv AT kiamaneshomid thestateoftheheartbiopsyaclinicalreview
AT tomamustafa thestateoftheheartbiopsyaclinicalreview
AT kiamaneshomid stateoftheheartbiopsyaclinicalreview
AT tomamustafa stateoftheheartbiopsyaclinicalreview