Cargando…
The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
OBJECTIVE. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chron...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018 |
_version_ | 1783694327923343360 |
---|---|
author | Rajan, Alexander T Boback, Jessica L Dammann, John F Tenore, Francesco V Wester, Brock A Otto, Kevin J Gaunt, Robert A Bensmaia, Sliman J |
author_facet | Rajan, Alexander T Boback, Jessica L Dammann, John F Tenore, Francesco V Wester, Brock A Otto, Kevin J Gaunt, Robert A Bensmaia, Sliman J |
author_sort | Rajan, Alexander T |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the neuronal tissue across a variety of stimulation regimes in non-human primates. We also examine each animal’s ability to use their hand—the cortical representation of which is targeted by the ICMS—as a further assay of possible neuronal damage. APPROACH. We implanted electrode arrays in the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques and delivered ICMS four hours per day, five days per week, for six months. Multiple regimes of ICMS were delivered to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters on the tissue and behavior. Parameters included current amplitude (10–100 μA), pulse train duration (1, 5 s), and duty cycle (1/1, 1/3). We then performed a range of histopathological assays on tissue near the tips of both stimulated and unstimulated electrodes to assess the effects of chronic ICMS on the tissue and their dependence on stimulation parameters. MAIN RESULTS. While the implantation and residence of the arrays in the cortical tissue did cause significant damage, chronic ICMS had no detectable additional effect; furthermore, the animals exhibited no impairments in fine motor control. SIGNIFICANCE. Chronic ICMS may be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprostheses as it does not cause significant damage to the stimulated tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8129590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81295902021-05-18 The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior Rajan, Alexander T Boback, Jessica L Dammann, John F Tenore, Francesco V Wester, Brock A Otto, Kevin J Gaunt, Robert A Bensmaia, Sliman J J Neural Eng Article OBJECTIVE. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the neuronal tissue across a variety of stimulation regimes in non-human primates. We also examine each animal’s ability to use their hand—the cortical representation of which is targeted by the ICMS—as a further assay of possible neuronal damage. APPROACH. We implanted electrode arrays in the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques and delivered ICMS four hours per day, five days per week, for six months. Multiple regimes of ICMS were delivered to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters on the tissue and behavior. Parameters included current amplitude (10–100 μA), pulse train duration (1, 5 s), and duty cycle (1/1, 1/3). We then performed a range of histopathological assays on tissue near the tips of both stimulated and unstimulated electrodes to assess the effects of chronic ICMS on the tissue and their dependence on stimulation parameters. MAIN RESULTS. While the implantation and residence of the arrays in the cortical tissue did cause significant damage, chronic ICMS had no detectable additional effect; furthermore, the animals exhibited no impairments in fine motor control. SIGNIFICANCE. Chronic ICMS may be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprostheses as it does not cause significant damage to the stimulated tissue. 2015-10-19 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8129590/ /pubmed/26479701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rajan, Alexander T Boback, Jessica L Dammann, John F Tenore, Francesco V Wester, Brock A Otto, Kevin J Gaunt, Robert A Bensmaia, Sliman J The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
title | The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
title_full | The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
title_fullStr | The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
title_short | The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
title_sort | effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajanalexandert theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT bobackjessical theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT dammannjohnf theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT tenorefrancescov theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT westerbrocka theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT ottokevinj theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT gauntroberta theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT bensmaiaslimanj theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT rajanalexandert effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT bobackjessical effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT dammannjohnf effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT tenorefrancescov effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT westerbrocka effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT ottokevinj effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT gauntroberta effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior AT bensmaiaslimanj effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior |