Cargando…

The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior

OBJECTIVE. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajan, Alexander T, Boback, Jessica L, Dammann, John F, Tenore, Francesco V, Wester, Brock A, Otto, Kevin J, Gaunt, Robert A, Bensmaia, Sliman J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018
_version_ 1783694327923343360
author Rajan, Alexander T
Boback, Jessica L
Dammann, John F
Tenore, Francesco V
Wester, Brock A
Otto, Kevin J
Gaunt, Robert A
Bensmaia, Sliman J
author_facet Rajan, Alexander T
Boback, Jessica L
Dammann, John F
Tenore, Francesco V
Wester, Brock A
Otto, Kevin J
Gaunt, Robert A
Bensmaia, Sliman J
author_sort Rajan, Alexander T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the neuronal tissue across a variety of stimulation regimes in non-human primates. We also examine each animal’s ability to use their hand—the cortical representation of which is targeted by the ICMS—as a further assay of possible neuronal damage. APPROACH. We implanted electrode arrays in the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques and delivered ICMS four hours per day, five days per week, for six months. Multiple regimes of ICMS were delivered to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters on the tissue and behavior. Parameters included current amplitude (10–100 μA), pulse train duration (1, 5 s), and duty cycle (1/1, 1/3). We then performed a range of histopathological assays on tissue near the tips of both stimulated and unstimulated electrodes to assess the effects of chronic ICMS on the tissue and their dependence on stimulation parameters. MAIN RESULTS. While the implantation and residence of the arrays in the cortical tissue did cause significant damage, chronic ICMS had no detectable additional effect; furthermore, the animals exhibited no impairments in fine motor control. SIGNIFICANCE. Chronic ICMS may be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprostheses as it does not cause significant damage to the stimulated tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81295902021-05-18 The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior Rajan, Alexander T Boback, Jessica L Dammann, John F Tenore, Francesco V Wester, Brock A Otto, Kevin J Gaunt, Robert A Bensmaia, Sliman J J Neural Eng Article OBJECTIVE. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the neuronal tissue across a variety of stimulation regimes in non-human primates. We also examine each animal’s ability to use their hand—the cortical representation of which is targeted by the ICMS—as a further assay of possible neuronal damage. APPROACH. We implanted electrode arrays in the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques and delivered ICMS four hours per day, five days per week, for six months. Multiple regimes of ICMS were delivered to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters on the tissue and behavior. Parameters included current amplitude (10–100 μA), pulse train duration (1, 5 s), and duty cycle (1/1, 1/3). We then performed a range of histopathological assays on tissue near the tips of both stimulated and unstimulated electrodes to assess the effects of chronic ICMS on the tissue and their dependence on stimulation parameters. MAIN RESULTS. While the implantation and residence of the arrays in the cortical tissue did cause significant damage, chronic ICMS had no detectable additional effect; furthermore, the animals exhibited no impairments in fine motor control. SIGNIFICANCE. Chronic ICMS may be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprostheses as it does not cause significant damage to the stimulated tissue. 2015-10-19 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8129590/ /pubmed/26479701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rajan, Alexander T
Boback, Jessica L
Dammann, John F
Tenore, Francesco V
Wester, Brock A
Otto, Kevin J
Gaunt, Robert A
Bensmaia, Sliman J
The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
title The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
title_full The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
title_fullStr The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
title_full_unstemmed The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
title_short The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
title_sort effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26479701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018
work_keys_str_mv AT rajanalexandert theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT bobackjessical theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT dammannjohnf theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT tenorefrancescov theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT westerbrocka theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT ottokevinj theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT gauntroberta theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT bensmaiaslimanj theeffectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT rajanalexandert effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT bobackjessical effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT dammannjohnf effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT tenorefrancescov effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT westerbrocka effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT ottokevinj effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT gauntroberta effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior
AT bensmaiaslimanj effectsofchronicintracorticalmicrostimulationonneuraltissueandfinemotorbehavior