Cargando…

The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors

STUDY QUESTION: What are the sperm and egg donor rejection rates after expanded carrier screening (ECS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using an ECS panel looking at 46/47 genes, 17.6% of donors were rejected. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of ECS is becoming commonplace in assisted reproductive technology, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Molly R, Skytte, Anne-Bine, Harper, Joyce C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab067
_version_ 1783694328514740224
author Payne, Molly R
Skytte, Anne-Bine
Harper, Joyce C
author_facet Payne, Molly R
Skytte, Anne-Bine
Harper, Joyce C
author_sort Payne, Molly R
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: What are the sperm and egg donor rejection rates after expanded carrier screening (ECS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using an ECS panel looking at 46/47 genes, 17.6% of donors were rejected. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of ECS is becoming commonplace in assisted reproductive technology, including testing of egg and sperm donors. Most national guidelines recommend rejection of donors if they are carriers of a genetic disease. If the use of ECS increases, there will be a decline in the number of donors available. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A review of the current preconception ECS panels available to donors was carried out through an online search. The genetic testing results of donors from Cryos International were analysed to determine how many were rejected on the basis of the ECS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data on gamete donors and their carrier status was provided by Cryos International, who screen donors using their own bespoke ECS panel. The ECS panels identified through the review were compared to the Cryos International panel and data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 16 companies and 42 associated ECS panels were reviewed. There were a total of 2673 unique disorders covered by the panels examined, with a mean of 329 disorders screened. None of these disorders were common to all panels. Cryos International screen 46 disorders in males and 47 in females. From 883 candidate donors, 17.6% (155/883) were rejected based on their ECS result. Carriers of alpha-thalassaemia represented the largest proportion of those rejected (19.4%, 30/155), then spinal muscular atrophy (15.5%, 24/155) and cystic fibrosis (14.8%, 23/155). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Panel information was found on company websites and may not have been accurate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study highlights the need for consistent EU regulations and guidelines that allow genetic matching of gamete donors to their recipients, preventing the need to reject donors who are known carriers. A larger ECS panel would be most beneficial; however, this would not be viable without matching of donors and recipients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained. J.C.H. is the founder of Global Women Connected, a platform to discuss women’s health issues and the Embryology and PGD Academy, who deliver education in clinical embryology. She has been paid to give a lecture by Cryos in 2019. A-B.S. is an employee of Cryos International. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81295922021-05-21 The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors Payne, Molly R Skytte, Anne-Bine Harper, Joyce C Hum Reprod Original Articles STUDY QUESTION: What are the sperm and egg donor rejection rates after expanded carrier screening (ECS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using an ECS panel looking at 46/47 genes, 17.6% of donors were rejected. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of ECS is becoming commonplace in assisted reproductive technology, including testing of egg and sperm donors. Most national guidelines recommend rejection of donors if they are carriers of a genetic disease. If the use of ECS increases, there will be a decline in the number of donors available. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A review of the current preconception ECS panels available to donors was carried out through an online search. The genetic testing results of donors from Cryos International were analysed to determine how many were rejected on the basis of the ECS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data on gamete donors and their carrier status was provided by Cryos International, who screen donors using their own bespoke ECS panel. The ECS panels identified through the review were compared to the Cryos International panel and data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 16 companies and 42 associated ECS panels were reviewed. There were a total of 2673 unique disorders covered by the panels examined, with a mean of 329 disorders screened. None of these disorders were common to all panels. Cryos International screen 46 disorders in males and 47 in females. From 883 candidate donors, 17.6% (155/883) were rejected based on their ECS result. Carriers of alpha-thalassaemia represented the largest proportion of those rejected (19.4%, 30/155), then spinal muscular atrophy (15.5%, 24/155) and cystic fibrosis (14.8%, 23/155). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Panel information was found on company websites and may not have been accurate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study highlights the need for consistent EU regulations and guidelines that allow genetic matching of gamete donors to their recipients, preventing the need to reject donors who are known carriers. A larger ECS panel would be most beneficial; however, this would not be viable without matching of donors and recipients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained. J.C.H. is the founder of Global Women Connected, a platform to discuss women’s health issues and the Embryology and PGD Academy, who deliver education in clinical embryology. She has been paid to give a lecture by Cryos in 2019. A-B.S. is an employee of Cryos International. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A Oxford University Press 2021-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8129592/ /pubmed/33842976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab067 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Payne, Molly R
Skytte, Anne-Bine
Harper, Joyce C
The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
title The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
title_full The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
title_fullStr The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
title_full_unstemmed The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
title_short The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
title_sort use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33842976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab067
work_keys_str_mv AT paynemollyr theuseofexpandedcarrierscreeningofgametedonors
AT skytteannebine theuseofexpandedcarrierscreeningofgametedonors
AT harperjoycec theuseofexpandedcarrierscreeningofgametedonors
AT paynemollyr useofexpandedcarrierscreeningofgametedonors
AT skytteannebine useofexpandedcarrierscreeningofgametedonors
AT harperjoycec useofexpandedcarrierscreeningofgametedonors