Cargando…
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remain...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.655771 |
_version_ | 1783694341203558400 |
---|---|
author | Ta, Giang Huong Weng, Ching-Feng Leong, Max K. |
author_facet | Ta, Giang Huong Weng, Ching-Feng Leong, Max K. |
author_sort | Ta, Giang Huong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remains to be causal for biosafety warrant. As such, commercial products such as ointments or cosmetics can fulfill the topically safe requirements in animal and non-animal models including allergy. Europe, nevertheless, has banned animal tests for the safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients since 2013, followed by other countries. A variety of non-animal in vitro tests addressing different key events of the AOP, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), KeratinoSens™, LuSens and human cell line activation test h-CLAT and U-SENS™ have been developed and were adopted in OECD test guideline to identify the skin sensitizers. Other methods, such as the SENS-IS are not yet fully validated and regulatorily accepted. A broad spectrum of in silico models, alternatively, to predict skin sensitization have emerged based on various animal and non-animal data using assorted modeling schemes. In this article, we extensively summarize a number of skin sensitization predictive models that can be used in the biopharmaceutics and cosmeceuticals industries as well as their future perspectives, and the underlined challenges are also discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8129647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81296472021-05-19 In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? Ta, Giang Huong Weng, Ching-Feng Leong, Max K. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remains to be causal for biosafety warrant. As such, commercial products such as ointments or cosmetics can fulfill the topically safe requirements in animal and non-animal models including allergy. Europe, nevertheless, has banned animal tests for the safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients since 2013, followed by other countries. A variety of non-animal in vitro tests addressing different key events of the AOP, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), KeratinoSens™, LuSens and human cell line activation test h-CLAT and U-SENS™ have been developed and were adopted in OECD test guideline to identify the skin sensitizers. Other methods, such as the SENS-IS are not yet fully validated and regulatorily accepted. A broad spectrum of in silico models, alternatively, to predict skin sensitization have emerged based on various animal and non-animal data using assorted modeling schemes. In this article, we extensively summarize a number of skin sensitization predictive models that can be used in the biopharmaceutics and cosmeceuticals industries as well as their future perspectives, and the underlined challenges are also discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8129647/ /pubmed/34017255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.655771 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ta, Weng and Leong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Ta, Giang Huong Weng, Ching-Feng Leong, Max K. In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? |
title |
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? |
title_full |
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? |
title_fullStr |
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? |
title_full_unstemmed |
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? |
title_short |
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? |
title_sort | in silico prediction of skin sensitization: quo vadis? |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.655771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tagianghuong insilicopredictionofskinsensitizationquovadis AT wengchingfeng insilicopredictionofskinsensitizationquovadis AT leongmaxk insilicopredictionofskinsensitizationquovadis |