Cargando…

In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?

Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ta, Giang Huong, Weng, Ching-Feng, Leong, Max K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.655771
_version_ 1783694341203558400
author Ta, Giang Huong
Weng, Ching-Feng
Leong, Max K.
author_facet Ta, Giang Huong
Weng, Ching-Feng
Leong, Max K.
author_sort Ta, Giang Huong
collection PubMed
description Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remains to be causal for biosafety warrant. As such, commercial products such as ointments or cosmetics can fulfill the topically safe requirements in animal and non-animal models including allergy. Europe, nevertheless, has banned animal tests for the safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients since 2013, followed by other countries. A variety of non-animal in vitro tests addressing different key events of the AOP, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), KeratinoSens™, LuSens and human cell line activation test h-CLAT and U-SENS™ have been developed and were adopted in OECD test guideline to identify the skin sensitizers. Other methods, such as the SENS-IS are not yet fully validated and regulatorily accepted. A broad spectrum of in silico models, alternatively, to predict skin sensitization have emerged based on various animal and non-animal data using assorted modeling schemes. In this article, we extensively summarize a number of skin sensitization predictive models that can be used in the biopharmaceutics and cosmeceuticals industries as well as their future perspectives, and the underlined challenges are also discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81296472021-05-19 In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis? Ta, Giang Huong Weng, Ching-Feng Leong, Max K. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Skin direct contact with chemical or physical substances is predisposed to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), producing various allergic reactions, namely rash, blister, or itchy, in the contacted skin area. ACD can be triggered by various extremely complicated adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) remains to be causal for biosafety warrant. As such, commercial products such as ointments or cosmetics can fulfill the topically safe requirements in animal and non-animal models including allergy. Europe, nevertheless, has banned animal tests for the safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients since 2013, followed by other countries. A variety of non-animal in vitro tests addressing different key events of the AOP, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), KeratinoSens™, LuSens and human cell line activation test h-CLAT and U-SENS™ have been developed and were adopted in OECD test guideline to identify the skin sensitizers. Other methods, such as the SENS-IS are not yet fully validated and regulatorily accepted. A broad spectrum of in silico models, alternatively, to predict skin sensitization have emerged based on various animal and non-animal data using assorted modeling schemes. In this article, we extensively summarize a number of skin sensitization predictive models that can be used in the biopharmaceutics and cosmeceuticals industries as well as their future perspectives, and the underlined challenges are also discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8129647/ /pubmed/34017255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.655771 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ta, Weng and Leong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Ta, Giang Huong
Weng, Ching-Feng
Leong, Max K.
In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
title In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
title_full In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
title_fullStr In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
title_full_unstemmed In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
title_short In silico Prediction of Skin Sensitization: Quo vadis?
title_sort in silico prediction of skin sensitization: quo vadis?
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.655771
work_keys_str_mv AT tagianghuong insilicopredictionofskinsensitizationquovadis
AT wengchingfeng insilicopredictionofskinsensitizationquovadis
AT leongmaxk insilicopredictionofskinsensitizationquovadis