Cargando…
Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
PURPOSE: Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different lat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier, Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33412260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041 |
_version_ | 1783694417648943104 |
---|---|
author | Brand, Douglas H. Brüningk, Sarah C. Wilkins, Anna Fernandez, Katie Naismith, Olivia Gao, Annie Syndikus, Isabel Dearnaley, David P. Tree, Alison C. van As, Nicholas Hall, Emma Gulliford, Sarah |
author_facet | Brand, Douglas H. Brüningk, Sarah C. Wilkins, Anna Fernandez, Katie Naismith, Olivia Gao, Annie Syndikus, Isabel Dearnaley, David P. Tree, Alison C. van As, Nicholas Hall, Emma Gulliford, Sarah |
author_sort | Brand, Douglas H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different late rectal effects after prostate external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CHHiP trial (ISRCTN97182923) randomized men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer 1:1:1 to 74 Gy/37 fractions (Fr), 60 Gy/20 Fr, or 57 Gy/19 Fr. Patients in the study had full dosimetric data and zero baseline toxicity. Toxicity scales were amalgamated to 6 bowel endpoints: bleeding, diarrhea, pain, proctitis, sphincter control, and stricture. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models with or without equivalent dose in 2 Gy/Fr correction were log-likelihood fitted by endpoint, estimating α/β ratios. The α/β ratio estimate sensitivity was assessed using sequential inclusion of dose modifying factors (DMFs): age, diabetes, hypertension, inflammatory bowel or diverticular disease (IBD/diverticular), and hemorrhoids. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were bootstrapped. Likelihood ratio testing of 632 estimator log-likelihoods compared the models. RESULTS: Late rectal α/β ratio estimates (without DMF) ranged from bleeding (G1 + α/β = 1.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.9-2.5 Gy) to sphincter control (G1 + α/β = 3.1 Gy; 95% CI, 1.4-9.1 Gy). Bowel pain modelled poorly (α/β, 3.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.0-840 Gy). Inclusion of IBD/diverticular disease as a DMF significantly improved fits for stool frequency G2+ (P = .00041) and proctitis G1+ (P = .00046). However, the α/β ratios were similar in these no-DMF versus DMF models for both stool frequency G2+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.5 Gy) and proctitis G1+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.6 Gy). Frequency-weighted averaging of endpoint α/β ratios produced: G1 + α/β ratio = 2.4 Gy; G2 + α/β ratio = 2.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated α/β ratios for several common late adverse effects of rectal radiation therapy. When comparing dose-fractionation schedules, we suggest using late a rectal α/β ratio ≤ 3 Gy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8129972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier, Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81299722021-06-01 Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial Brand, Douglas H. Brüningk, Sarah C. Wilkins, Anna Fernandez, Katie Naismith, Olivia Gao, Annie Syndikus, Isabel Dearnaley, David P. Tree, Alison C. van As, Nicholas Hall, Emma Gulliford, Sarah Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Physics Contribution PURPOSE: Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different late rectal effects after prostate external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CHHiP trial (ISRCTN97182923) randomized men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer 1:1:1 to 74 Gy/37 fractions (Fr), 60 Gy/20 Fr, or 57 Gy/19 Fr. Patients in the study had full dosimetric data and zero baseline toxicity. Toxicity scales were amalgamated to 6 bowel endpoints: bleeding, diarrhea, pain, proctitis, sphincter control, and stricture. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models with or without equivalent dose in 2 Gy/Fr correction were log-likelihood fitted by endpoint, estimating α/β ratios. The α/β ratio estimate sensitivity was assessed using sequential inclusion of dose modifying factors (DMFs): age, diabetes, hypertension, inflammatory bowel or diverticular disease (IBD/diverticular), and hemorrhoids. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were bootstrapped. Likelihood ratio testing of 632 estimator log-likelihoods compared the models. RESULTS: Late rectal α/β ratio estimates (without DMF) ranged from bleeding (G1 + α/β = 1.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.9-2.5 Gy) to sphincter control (G1 + α/β = 3.1 Gy; 95% CI, 1.4-9.1 Gy). Bowel pain modelled poorly (α/β, 3.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.0-840 Gy). Inclusion of IBD/diverticular disease as a DMF significantly improved fits for stool frequency G2+ (P = .00041) and proctitis G1+ (P = .00046). However, the α/β ratios were similar in these no-DMF versus DMF models for both stool frequency G2+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.5 Gy) and proctitis G1+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.6 Gy). Frequency-weighted averaging of endpoint α/β ratios produced: G1 + α/β ratio = 2.4 Gy; G2 + α/β ratio = 2.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated α/β ratios for several common late adverse effects of rectal radiation therapy. When comparing dose-fractionation schedules, we suggest using late a rectal α/β ratio ≤ 3 Gy. Elsevier, Inc 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8129972/ /pubmed/33412260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Physics Contribution Brand, Douglas H. Brüningk, Sarah C. Wilkins, Anna Fernandez, Katie Naismith, Olivia Gao, Annie Syndikus, Isabel Dearnaley, David P. Tree, Alison C. van As, Nicholas Hall, Emma Gulliford, Sarah Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial |
title | Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial |
title_full | Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial |
title_fullStr | Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial |
title_short | Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial |
title_sort | estimates of alpha/beta (α/β) ratios for individual late rectal toxicity endpoints: an analysis of the chhip trial |
topic | Physics Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33412260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT branddouglash estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT bruningksarahc estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT wilkinsanna estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT fernandezkatie estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT naismitholivia estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT gaoannie estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT syndikusisabel estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT dearnaleydavidp estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT treealisonc estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT vanasnicholas estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT hallemma estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT gullifordsarah estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial AT estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial |