Cargando…

Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial

PURPOSE: Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different lat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brand, Douglas H., Brüningk, Sarah C., Wilkins, Anna, Fernandez, Katie, Naismith, Olivia, Gao, Annie, Syndikus, Isabel, Dearnaley, David P., Tree, Alison C., van As, Nicholas, Hall, Emma, Gulliford, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33412260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041
_version_ 1783694417648943104
author Brand, Douglas H.
Brüningk, Sarah C.
Wilkins, Anna
Fernandez, Katie
Naismith, Olivia
Gao, Annie
Syndikus, Isabel
Dearnaley, David P.
Tree, Alison C.
van As, Nicholas
Hall, Emma
Gulliford, Sarah
author_facet Brand, Douglas H.
Brüningk, Sarah C.
Wilkins, Anna
Fernandez, Katie
Naismith, Olivia
Gao, Annie
Syndikus, Isabel
Dearnaley, David P.
Tree, Alison C.
van As, Nicholas
Hall, Emma
Gulliford, Sarah
author_sort Brand, Douglas H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different late rectal effects after prostate external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CHHiP trial (ISRCTN97182923) randomized men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer 1:1:1 to 74 Gy/37 fractions (Fr), 60 Gy/20 Fr, or 57 Gy/19 Fr. Patients in the study had full dosimetric data and zero baseline toxicity. Toxicity scales were amalgamated to 6 bowel endpoints: bleeding, diarrhea, pain, proctitis, sphincter control, and stricture. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models with or without equivalent dose in 2 Gy/Fr correction were log-likelihood fitted by endpoint, estimating α/β ratios. The α/β ratio estimate sensitivity was assessed using sequential inclusion of dose modifying factors (DMFs): age, diabetes, hypertension, inflammatory bowel or diverticular disease (IBD/diverticular), and hemorrhoids. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were bootstrapped. Likelihood ratio testing of 632 estimator log-likelihoods compared the models. RESULTS: Late rectal α/β ratio estimates (without DMF) ranged from bleeding (G1 + α/β = 1.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.9-2.5 Gy) to sphincter control (G1 + α/β = 3.1 Gy; 95% CI, 1.4-9.1 Gy). Bowel pain modelled poorly (α/β, 3.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.0-840 Gy). Inclusion of IBD/diverticular disease as a DMF significantly improved fits for stool frequency G2+ (P = .00041) and proctitis G1+ (P = .00046). However, the α/β ratios were similar in these no-DMF versus DMF models for both stool frequency G2+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.5 Gy) and proctitis G1+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.6 Gy). Frequency-weighted averaging of endpoint α/β ratios produced: G1 + α/β ratio = 2.4 Gy; G2 + α/β ratio = 2.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated α/β ratios for several common late adverse effects of rectal radiation therapy. When comparing dose-fractionation schedules, we suggest using late a rectal α/β ratio ≤ 3 Gy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8129972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier, Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81299722021-06-01 Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial Brand, Douglas H. Brüningk, Sarah C. Wilkins, Anna Fernandez, Katie Naismith, Olivia Gao, Annie Syndikus, Isabel Dearnaley, David P. Tree, Alison C. van As, Nicholas Hall, Emma Gulliford, Sarah Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Physics Contribution PURPOSE: Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different late rectal effects after prostate external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CHHiP trial (ISRCTN97182923) randomized men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer 1:1:1 to 74 Gy/37 fractions (Fr), 60 Gy/20 Fr, or 57 Gy/19 Fr. Patients in the study had full dosimetric data and zero baseline toxicity. Toxicity scales were amalgamated to 6 bowel endpoints: bleeding, diarrhea, pain, proctitis, sphincter control, and stricture. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models with or without equivalent dose in 2 Gy/Fr correction were log-likelihood fitted by endpoint, estimating α/β ratios. The α/β ratio estimate sensitivity was assessed using sequential inclusion of dose modifying factors (DMFs): age, diabetes, hypertension, inflammatory bowel or diverticular disease (IBD/diverticular), and hemorrhoids. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were bootstrapped. Likelihood ratio testing of 632 estimator log-likelihoods compared the models. RESULTS: Late rectal α/β ratio estimates (without DMF) ranged from bleeding (G1 + α/β = 1.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.9-2.5 Gy) to sphincter control (G1 + α/β = 3.1 Gy; 95% CI, 1.4-9.1 Gy). Bowel pain modelled poorly (α/β, 3.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.0-840 Gy). Inclusion of IBD/diverticular disease as a DMF significantly improved fits for stool frequency G2+ (P = .00041) and proctitis G1+ (P = .00046). However, the α/β ratios were similar in these no-DMF versus DMF models for both stool frequency G2+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.5 Gy) and proctitis G1+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.6 Gy). Frequency-weighted averaging of endpoint α/β ratios produced: G1 + α/β ratio = 2.4 Gy; G2 + α/β ratio = 2.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated α/β ratios for several common late adverse effects of rectal radiation therapy. When comparing dose-fractionation schedules, we suggest using late a rectal α/β ratio ≤ 3 Gy. Elsevier, Inc 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8129972/ /pubmed/33412260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Physics Contribution
Brand, Douglas H.
Brüningk, Sarah C.
Wilkins, Anna
Fernandez, Katie
Naismith, Olivia
Gao, Annie
Syndikus, Isabel
Dearnaley, David P.
Tree, Alison C.
van As, Nicholas
Hall, Emma
Gulliford, Sarah
Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
title Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
title_full Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
title_fullStr Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
title_short Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial
title_sort estimates of alpha/beta (α/β) ratios for individual late rectal toxicity endpoints: an analysis of the chhip trial
topic Physics Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8129972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33412260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041
work_keys_str_mv AT branddouglash estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT bruningksarahc estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT wilkinsanna estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT fernandezkatie estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT naismitholivia estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT gaoannie estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT syndikusisabel estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT dearnaleydavidp estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT treealisonc estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT vanasnicholas estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT hallemma estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT gullifordsarah estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial
AT estimatesofalphabetaabratiosforindividuallaterectaltoxicityendpointsananalysisofthechhiptrial