Cargando…
MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia?
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous magnetic resonance-guided (MR-guided) MWA procedures have traditionally been performed under local anesthesia (LA) and sedation. However, pain control is often difficult to manage, especially in some cases when the tumor is large or in a specific location, such as near the a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08298-2 |
_version_ | 1783694457021923328 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhaonan Wang, Chaoyan Li, Jing Liu, Zaoqu Jiao, Dechao Han, Xinwei |
author_facet | Li, Zhaonan Wang, Chaoyan Li, Jing Liu, Zaoqu Jiao, Dechao Han, Xinwei |
author_sort | Li, Zhaonan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous magnetic resonance-guided (MR-guided) MWA procedures have traditionally been performed under local anesthesia (LA) and sedation. However, pain control is often difficult to manage, especially in some cases when the tumor is large or in a specific location, such as near the abdominal wall or close to the hepatic dome. This study retrospectively compared the results of general anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA) for MR-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC ≤ 5.0 cm) to investigate whether different anesthesia methods lead to different clinical outcomes. METHODS: The results of the analysis include procedure-related complications, imaging response, and the time to complete two sets of procedures. According to the type of anesthesia, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the local tumor progression (LTP) of the two groups who underwent MR-guided MWA. RESULTS: All patients achieved technical success. The mean ablation duration of each patient in the GA group and LA group was remarkably different (P = 0.012). Both groups had no difference in complications or LTP (both P > 0.05). Notably, the tumor location (challenging locations) and the number of lesions (2–3 lesions) could be the main factors affecting LTP (p = 0.000, p = 0.015). Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression indicated that using different anesthesia methods (GA and LA) was not associated with longer LTP (P = 0.237), while tumor location (challenging locations) and the number of lesions (2–3 lesions) were both related to shorter LTP (P = 0.000, P = 0.020, respectively). Additionally, multivariate Cox regression further revealed that the tumor location (regular locations) and the number of lesions (single) could independently predict better LTP (P = 0.000, P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No correlation was observed between GA and LA for LTP after MR-guided MWA. However, tumors in challenging locations and the number of lesions (2–3 lesions) appear to be the main factors affecting LTP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8130145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81301452021-05-18 MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? Li, Zhaonan Wang, Chaoyan Li, Jing Liu, Zaoqu Jiao, Dechao Han, Xinwei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous magnetic resonance-guided (MR-guided) MWA procedures have traditionally been performed under local anesthesia (LA) and sedation. However, pain control is often difficult to manage, especially in some cases when the tumor is large or in a specific location, such as near the abdominal wall or close to the hepatic dome. This study retrospectively compared the results of general anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA) for MR-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC ≤ 5.0 cm) to investigate whether different anesthesia methods lead to different clinical outcomes. METHODS: The results of the analysis include procedure-related complications, imaging response, and the time to complete two sets of procedures. According to the type of anesthesia, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the local tumor progression (LTP) of the two groups who underwent MR-guided MWA. RESULTS: All patients achieved technical success. The mean ablation duration of each patient in the GA group and LA group was remarkably different (P = 0.012). Both groups had no difference in complications or LTP (both P > 0.05). Notably, the tumor location (challenging locations) and the number of lesions (2–3 lesions) could be the main factors affecting LTP (p = 0.000, p = 0.015). Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression indicated that using different anesthesia methods (GA and LA) was not associated with longer LTP (P = 0.237), while tumor location (challenging locations) and the number of lesions (2–3 lesions) were both related to shorter LTP (P = 0.000, P = 0.020, respectively). Additionally, multivariate Cox regression further revealed that the tumor location (regular locations) and the number of lesions (single) could independently predict better LTP (P = 0.000, P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No correlation was observed between GA and LA for LTP after MR-guided MWA. However, tumors in challenging locations and the number of lesions (2–3 lesions) appear to be the main factors affecting LTP. BioMed Central 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8130145/ /pubmed/34001036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08298-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Zhaonan Wang, Chaoyan Li, Jing Liu, Zaoqu Jiao, Dechao Han, Xinwei MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
title | MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
title_full | MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
title_fullStr | MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
title_full_unstemmed | MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
title_short | MR-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
title_sort | mr-guided microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc): is general anesthesia more effective than local anesthesia? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08298-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhaonan mrguidedmicrowaveablationofhepatocellularcarcinomahccisgeneralanesthesiamoreeffectivethanlocalanesthesia AT wangchaoyan mrguidedmicrowaveablationofhepatocellularcarcinomahccisgeneralanesthesiamoreeffectivethanlocalanesthesia AT lijing mrguidedmicrowaveablationofhepatocellularcarcinomahccisgeneralanesthesiamoreeffectivethanlocalanesthesia AT liuzaoqu mrguidedmicrowaveablationofhepatocellularcarcinomahccisgeneralanesthesiamoreeffectivethanlocalanesthesia AT jiaodechao mrguidedmicrowaveablationofhepatocellularcarcinomahccisgeneralanesthesiamoreeffectivethanlocalanesthesia AT hanxinwei mrguidedmicrowaveablationofhepatocellularcarcinomahccisgeneralanesthesiamoreeffectivethanlocalanesthesia |