Cargando…
Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
BACKGROUND: Invasive urodynamics is used to investigate the causes of lower urinary tract symptoms; a procedure usually conducted in secondary care by specialist practitioners. No study has yet investigated the feasibility of carrying out this procedure in a non-specialist setting. Therefore, the ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y |
_version_ | 1783694457256804352 |
---|---|
author | Milosevic, Sarah Joseph-Williams, Natalie Pell, Bethan Cain, Elizabeth Hackett, Robyn Murdoch, Ffion Ahmed, Haroon Allen, A. Joy Bray, Alison Clarke, Samantha Drake, Marcus J. Drinnan, Michael Hood, Kerenza Schatzberger, Tom Takwoingi, Yemisi Thomas-Jones, Emma White, Raymond Edwards, Adrian Harding, Chris |
author_facet | Milosevic, Sarah Joseph-Williams, Natalie Pell, Bethan Cain, Elizabeth Hackett, Robyn Murdoch, Ffion Ahmed, Haroon Allen, A. Joy Bray, Alison Clarke, Samantha Drake, Marcus J. Drinnan, Michael Hood, Kerenza Schatzberger, Tom Takwoingi, Yemisi Thomas-Jones, Emma White, Raymond Edwards, Adrian Harding, Chris |
author_sort | Milosevic, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Invasive urodynamics is used to investigate the causes of lower urinary tract symptoms; a procedure usually conducted in secondary care by specialist practitioners. No study has yet investigated the feasibility of carrying out this procedure in a non-specialist setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore, using qualitative methodology, the feasibility and acceptability of conducting invasive urodynamic testing in primary care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the pilot phase of the PriMUS study, in which men experiencing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms underwent invasive urodynamic testing along with a series of simple index tests in a primary care setting. Interviewees were 25 patients invited to take part in the PriMUS study and 18 healthcare professionals involved in study delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Patients generally found the urodynamic procedure acceptable and valued the primary care setting due to its increased accessibility and familiarity. Despite some logistical issues, facilitating invasive urodynamic testing in primary care was also a positive experience for urodynamic nurses. Initial issues with general practitioners receiving and utilising the results of urodynamic testing may have limited the potential benefit to some patients. Effective approaches to study recruitment included emphasising the benefits of the urodynamic test and maintaining contact with potential participants by telephone. Patients’ relationship with their general practitioner was an important influence on study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care is feasible and acceptable and has the potential to benefit patients. Facilitating study procedures in a familiar primary care setting can impact positively on research recruitment. However, it is vital that there is a support network for urodynamic nurses and expertise available to help interpret urodynamic results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8130146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81301462021-05-18 Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals Milosevic, Sarah Joseph-Williams, Natalie Pell, Bethan Cain, Elizabeth Hackett, Robyn Murdoch, Ffion Ahmed, Haroon Allen, A. Joy Bray, Alison Clarke, Samantha Drake, Marcus J. Drinnan, Michael Hood, Kerenza Schatzberger, Tom Takwoingi, Yemisi Thomas-Jones, Emma White, Raymond Edwards, Adrian Harding, Chris Diagn Progn Res Research BACKGROUND: Invasive urodynamics is used to investigate the causes of lower urinary tract symptoms; a procedure usually conducted in secondary care by specialist practitioners. No study has yet investigated the feasibility of carrying out this procedure in a non-specialist setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore, using qualitative methodology, the feasibility and acceptability of conducting invasive urodynamic testing in primary care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the pilot phase of the PriMUS study, in which men experiencing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms underwent invasive urodynamic testing along with a series of simple index tests in a primary care setting. Interviewees were 25 patients invited to take part in the PriMUS study and 18 healthcare professionals involved in study delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Patients generally found the urodynamic procedure acceptable and valued the primary care setting due to its increased accessibility and familiarity. Despite some logistical issues, facilitating invasive urodynamic testing in primary care was also a positive experience for urodynamic nurses. Initial issues with general practitioners receiving and utilising the results of urodynamic testing may have limited the potential benefit to some patients. Effective approaches to study recruitment included emphasising the benefits of the urodynamic test and maintaining contact with potential participants by telephone. Patients’ relationship with their general practitioner was an important influence on study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care is feasible and acceptable and has the potential to benefit patients. Facilitating study procedures in a familiar primary care setting can impact positively on research recruitment. However, it is vital that there is a support network for urodynamic nurses and expertise available to help interpret urodynamic results. BioMed Central 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8130146/ /pubmed/34006320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Milosevic, Sarah Joseph-Williams, Natalie Pell, Bethan Cain, Elizabeth Hackett, Robyn Murdoch, Ffion Ahmed, Haroon Allen, A. Joy Bray, Alison Clarke, Samantha Drake, Marcus J. Drinnan, Michael Hood, Kerenza Schatzberger, Tom Takwoingi, Yemisi Thomas-Jones, Emma White, Raymond Edwards, Adrian Harding, Chris Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
title | Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
title_full | Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
title_fullStr | Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
title_short | Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
title_sort | conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milosevicsarah conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT josephwilliamsnatalie conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT pellbethan conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT cainelizabeth conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT hackettrobyn conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT murdochffion conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT ahmedharoon conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT allenajoy conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT brayalison conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT clarkesamantha conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT drakemarcusj conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT drinnanmichael conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT hoodkerenza conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT schatzbergertom conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT takwoingiyemisi conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT thomasjonesemma conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT whiteraymond conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT edwardsadrian conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals AT hardingchris conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals |