Cargando…

Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND: Invasive urodynamics is used to investigate the causes of lower urinary tract symptoms; a procedure usually conducted in secondary care by specialist practitioners. No study has yet investigated the feasibility of carrying out this procedure in a non-specialist setting. Therefore, the ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milosevic, Sarah, Joseph-Williams, Natalie, Pell, Bethan, Cain, Elizabeth, Hackett, Robyn, Murdoch, Ffion, Ahmed, Haroon, Allen, A. Joy, Bray, Alison, Clarke, Samantha, Drake, Marcus J., Drinnan, Michael, Hood, Kerenza, Schatzberger, Tom, Takwoingi, Yemisi, Thomas-Jones, Emma, White, Raymond, Edwards, Adrian, Harding, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y
_version_ 1783694457256804352
author Milosevic, Sarah
Joseph-Williams, Natalie
Pell, Bethan
Cain, Elizabeth
Hackett, Robyn
Murdoch, Ffion
Ahmed, Haroon
Allen, A. Joy
Bray, Alison
Clarke, Samantha
Drake, Marcus J.
Drinnan, Michael
Hood, Kerenza
Schatzberger, Tom
Takwoingi, Yemisi
Thomas-Jones, Emma
White, Raymond
Edwards, Adrian
Harding, Chris
author_facet Milosevic, Sarah
Joseph-Williams, Natalie
Pell, Bethan
Cain, Elizabeth
Hackett, Robyn
Murdoch, Ffion
Ahmed, Haroon
Allen, A. Joy
Bray, Alison
Clarke, Samantha
Drake, Marcus J.
Drinnan, Michael
Hood, Kerenza
Schatzberger, Tom
Takwoingi, Yemisi
Thomas-Jones, Emma
White, Raymond
Edwards, Adrian
Harding, Chris
author_sort Milosevic, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Invasive urodynamics is used to investigate the causes of lower urinary tract symptoms; a procedure usually conducted in secondary care by specialist practitioners. No study has yet investigated the feasibility of carrying out this procedure in a non-specialist setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore, using qualitative methodology, the feasibility and acceptability of conducting invasive urodynamic testing in primary care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the pilot phase of the PriMUS study, in which men experiencing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms underwent invasive urodynamic testing along with a series of simple index tests in a primary care setting. Interviewees were 25 patients invited to take part in the PriMUS study and 18 healthcare professionals involved in study delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Patients generally found the urodynamic procedure acceptable and valued the primary care setting due to its increased accessibility and familiarity. Despite some logistical issues, facilitating invasive urodynamic testing in primary care was also a positive experience for urodynamic nurses. Initial issues with general practitioners receiving and utilising the results of urodynamic testing may have limited the potential benefit to some patients. Effective approaches to study recruitment included emphasising the benefits of the urodynamic test and maintaining contact with potential participants by telephone. Patients’ relationship with their general practitioner was an important influence on study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care is feasible and acceptable and has the potential to benefit patients. Facilitating study procedures in a familiar primary care setting can impact positively on research recruitment. However, it is vital that there is a support network for urodynamic nurses and expertise available to help interpret urodynamic results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81301462021-05-18 Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals Milosevic, Sarah Joseph-Williams, Natalie Pell, Bethan Cain, Elizabeth Hackett, Robyn Murdoch, Ffion Ahmed, Haroon Allen, A. Joy Bray, Alison Clarke, Samantha Drake, Marcus J. Drinnan, Michael Hood, Kerenza Schatzberger, Tom Takwoingi, Yemisi Thomas-Jones, Emma White, Raymond Edwards, Adrian Harding, Chris Diagn Progn Res Research BACKGROUND: Invasive urodynamics is used to investigate the causes of lower urinary tract symptoms; a procedure usually conducted in secondary care by specialist practitioners. No study has yet investigated the feasibility of carrying out this procedure in a non-specialist setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore, using qualitative methodology, the feasibility and acceptability of conducting invasive urodynamic testing in primary care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the pilot phase of the PriMUS study, in which men experiencing bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms underwent invasive urodynamic testing along with a series of simple index tests in a primary care setting. Interviewees were 25 patients invited to take part in the PriMUS study and 18 healthcare professionals involved in study delivery. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Patients generally found the urodynamic procedure acceptable and valued the primary care setting due to its increased accessibility and familiarity. Despite some logistical issues, facilitating invasive urodynamic testing in primary care was also a positive experience for urodynamic nurses. Initial issues with general practitioners receiving and utilising the results of urodynamic testing may have limited the potential benefit to some patients. Effective approaches to study recruitment included emphasising the benefits of the urodynamic test and maintaining contact with potential participants by telephone. Patients’ relationship with their general practitioner was an important influence on study participation. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care is feasible and acceptable and has the potential to benefit patients. Facilitating study procedures in a familiar primary care setting can impact positively on research recruitment. However, it is vital that there is a support network for urodynamic nurses and expertise available to help interpret urodynamic results. BioMed Central 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8130146/ /pubmed/34006320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Milosevic, Sarah
Joseph-Williams, Natalie
Pell, Bethan
Cain, Elizabeth
Hackett, Robyn
Murdoch, Ffion
Ahmed, Haroon
Allen, A. Joy
Bray, Alison
Clarke, Samantha
Drake, Marcus J.
Drinnan, Michael
Hood, Kerenza
Schatzberger, Tom
Takwoingi, Yemisi
Thomas-Jones, Emma
White, Raymond
Edwards, Adrian
Harding, Chris
Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
title Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
title_full Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
title_fullStr Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
title_short Conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
title_sort conducting invasive urodynamics in primary care: qualitative interview study examining experiences of patients and healthcare professionals
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00100-y
work_keys_str_mv AT milosevicsarah conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT josephwilliamsnatalie conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT pellbethan conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT cainelizabeth conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT hackettrobyn conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT murdochffion conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT ahmedharoon conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT allenajoy conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT brayalison conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT clarkesamantha conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT drakemarcusj conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT drinnanmichael conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT hoodkerenza conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT schatzbergertom conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT takwoingiyemisi conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT thomasjonesemma conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT whiteraymond conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT edwardsadrian conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals
AT hardingchris conductinginvasiveurodynamicsinprimarycarequalitativeinterviewstudyexaminingexperiencesofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionals