Cargando…

A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Communities of Practice (CoPs) focus on learning, knowledge sharing, and creation, and research indicates they can improve healthcare performance. This article describes the development of a CoP that focused on synthesizing and adapting evidence in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Jennifer L., Bjørkli, Cato, Havdahl, Richard Tidemann, Lømo, Linn Lien, Midthaug, Mari, Skjuve, Marita, Klokkerud, Mari, Nordvik, Jan E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02711-x
_version_ 1783694459299430400
author Moore, Jennifer L.
Bjørkli, Cato
Havdahl, Richard Tidemann
Lømo, Linn Lien
Midthaug, Mari
Skjuve, Marita
Klokkerud, Mari
Nordvik, Jan E.
author_facet Moore, Jennifer L.
Bjørkli, Cato
Havdahl, Richard Tidemann
Lømo, Linn Lien
Midthaug, Mari
Skjuve, Marita
Klokkerud, Mari
Nordvik, Jan E.
author_sort Moore, Jennifer L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Communities of Practice (CoPs) focus on learning, knowledge sharing, and creation, and research indicates they can improve healthcare performance. This article describes the development of a CoP that focused on synthesizing and adapting evidence in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). This study aimed to investigate the CoP members’ experiences and perceived barriers and enablers of CoP success in the early phase of a CoP. METHODS: Physical therapists and a physician (n = 10) volunteered for a CoP that synthesized literature of PM&R evidence. CoP members participated in education and training on critical appraisal and knowledge synthesis, practiced critical appraisal skills, and summarized literature. Three months after CoP initiation, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the CoP members’ experiences and reflections. Members also completed an online survey that included the Evidence-Based Practice Confidence scale (EPIC), questions related to CoP activities, and demographics before CoP initiation. We utilized the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to explore how these experiences related to the behavioral adaptation and participation. RESULTS: Ten themes related to the potential contributors to CoP success and failure were identified. These included project management, technological solutions, efficacy, organizational support, interaction, the bigger picture, self-development, time, and motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Contributors to CoP success may include clearly articulated project goals and participant expectations, education and training, reliable technology solutions, organizational support, face-to-face communication, and good project management. Importantly, CoP members need time to participate in activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02711-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81301562021-05-18 A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation Moore, Jennifer L. Bjørkli, Cato Havdahl, Richard Tidemann Lømo, Linn Lien Midthaug, Mari Skjuve, Marita Klokkerud, Mari Nordvik, Jan E. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Communities of Practice (CoPs) focus on learning, knowledge sharing, and creation, and research indicates they can improve healthcare performance. This article describes the development of a CoP that focused on synthesizing and adapting evidence in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). This study aimed to investigate the CoP members’ experiences and perceived barriers and enablers of CoP success in the early phase of a CoP. METHODS: Physical therapists and a physician (n = 10) volunteered for a CoP that synthesized literature of PM&R evidence. CoP members participated in education and training on critical appraisal and knowledge synthesis, practiced critical appraisal skills, and summarized literature. Three months after CoP initiation, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the CoP members’ experiences and reflections. Members also completed an online survey that included the Evidence-Based Practice Confidence scale (EPIC), questions related to CoP activities, and demographics before CoP initiation. We utilized the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to explore how these experiences related to the behavioral adaptation and participation. RESULTS: Ten themes related to the potential contributors to CoP success and failure were identified. These included project management, technological solutions, efficacy, organizational support, interaction, the bigger picture, self-development, time, and motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Contributors to CoP success may include clearly articulated project goals and participant expectations, education and training, reliable technology solutions, organizational support, face-to-face communication, and good project management. Importantly, CoP members need time to participate in activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02711-x. BioMed Central 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8130156/ /pubmed/34001073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02711-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moore, Jennifer L.
Bjørkli, Cato
Havdahl, Richard Tidemann
Lømo, Linn Lien
Midthaug, Mari
Skjuve, Marita
Klokkerud, Mari
Nordvik, Jan E.
A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
title A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
title_full A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
title_fullStr A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
title_short A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
title_sort qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02711-x
work_keys_str_mv AT moorejenniferl aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT bjørklicato aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT havdahlrichardtidemann aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT lømolinnlien aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT midthaugmari aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT skjuvemarita aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT klokkerudmari aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT nordvikjane aqualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT moorejenniferl qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT bjørklicato qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT havdahlrichardtidemann qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT lømolinnlien qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT midthaugmari qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT skjuvemarita qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT klokkerudmari qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation
AT nordvikjane qualitativestudyexploringcontributorstothesuccessofacommunityofpracticeinrehabilitation