Cargando…

Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of computed tomography (CT) image acquisition and reconstruction parameters, including slice thickness, pixel size, and dose, on automatic contouring algorithms. METHODS: Eleven scans from patients with head‐and‐neck cancer were reconstructed with varying slice thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Kai, Rhee, Dong Joo, Ger, Rachel, Layman, Rick, Yang, Jinzhong, Cardenas, Carlos E., Court, Laurence E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33779037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13207
_version_ 1783694469797773312
author Huang, Kai
Rhee, Dong Joo
Ger, Rachel
Layman, Rick
Yang, Jinzhong
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Court, Laurence E.
author_facet Huang, Kai
Rhee, Dong Joo
Ger, Rachel
Layman, Rick
Yang, Jinzhong
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Court, Laurence E.
author_sort Huang, Kai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of computed tomography (CT) image acquisition and reconstruction parameters, including slice thickness, pixel size, and dose, on automatic contouring algorithms. METHODS: Eleven scans from patients with head‐and‐neck cancer were reconstructed with varying slice thicknesses and pixel sizes. CT dose was varied by adding noise using low‐dose simulation software. The impact of these imaging parameters on two in‐house auto‐contouring algorithms, one convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based and one multiatlas‐based system (MACS) was investigated for 183 reconstructed scans. For each algorithm, auto‐contours for organs‐at‐risk were compared with auto‐contours from scans with 3 mm slice thickness, 0.977 mm pixel size, and 100% CT dose using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean surface distance (MSD). RESULTS: Increasing the slice thickness from baseline value of 3 mm gave a progressive reduction in DSC and an increase in HD and MSD on average for all structures. Reducing the CT dose only had a relatively minimal effect on DSC and HD. The rate of change with respect to dose for both auto‐contouring methods is approximately 0. Changes in pixel size had a small effect on DSC and HD for CNN‐based auto‐contouring with differences in DSC being within 0.07. Small structures had larger deviations from the baseline values than large structures for DSC. The relative differences in HD and MSD between the large and small structures were small. CONCLUSIONS: Auto‐contours can deviate substantially with changes in CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters, especially slice thickness and pixel size. The CNN was less sensitive to changes in pixel size, and dose levels than the MACS. The results contraindicated more restrictive values for the parameters should be used than a typical imaging protocol for head‐and‐neck.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81302232021-05-21 Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms Huang, Kai Rhee, Dong Joo Ger, Rachel Layman, Rick Yang, Jinzhong Cardenas, Carlos E. Court, Laurence E. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of computed tomography (CT) image acquisition and reconstruction parameters, including slice thickness, pixel size, and dose, on automatic contouring algorithms. METHODS: Eleven scans from patients with head‐and‐neck cancer were reconstructed with varying slice thicknesses and pixel sizes. CT dose was varied by adding noise using low‐dose simulation software. The impact of these imaging parameters on two in‐house auto‐contouring algorithms, one convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based and one multiatlas‐based system (MACS) was investigated for 183 reconstructed scans. For each algorithm, auto‐contours for organs‐at‐risk were compared with auto‐contours from scans with 3 mm slice thickness, 0.977 mm pixel size, and 100% CT dose using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean surface distance (MSD). RESULTS: Increasing the slice thickness from baseline value of 3 mm gave a progressive reduction in DSC and an increase in HD and MSD on average for all structures. Reducing the CT dose only had a relatively minimal effect on DSC and HD. The rate of change with respect to dose for both auto‐contouring methods is approximately 0. Changes in pixel size had a small effect on DSC and HD for CNN‐based auto‐contouring with differences in DSC being within 0.07. Small structures had larger deviations from the baseline values than large structures for DSC. The relative differences in HD and MSD between the large and small structures were small. CONCLUSIONS: Auto‐contours can deviate substantially with changes in CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters, especially slice thickness and pixel size. The CNN was less sensitive to changes in pixel size, and dose levels than the MACS. The results contraindicated more restrictive values for the parameters should be used than a typical imaging protocol for head‐and‐neck. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8130223/ /pubmed/33779037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13207 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Huang, Kai
Rhee, Dong Joo
Ger, Rachel
Layman, Rick
Yang, Jinzhong
Cardenas, Carlos E.
Court, Laurence E.
Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
title Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
title_full Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
title_fullStr Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
title_full_unstemmed Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
title_short Impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and CT dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
title_sort impact of slice thickness, pixel size, and ct dose on the performance of automatic contouring algorithms
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33779037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13207
work_keys_str_mv AT huangkai impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms
AT rheedongjoo impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms
AT gerrachel impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms
AT laymanrick impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms
AT yangjinzhong impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms
AT cardenascarlose impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms
AT courtlaurencee impactofslicethicknesspixelsizeandctdoseontheperformanceofautomaticcontouringalgorithms