Cargando…

Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of surface‐guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in cranial patient setup by direct comparison between optical surface imaging (OSI) and cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT), before applying SGRT‐only setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sang Kyu, Huang, Sheng, Zhang, Lei, Ballangrud, Ase M., Aristophanous, Michalis, Cervino Arriba, Laura I., Li, Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33792186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13241
_version_ 1783694471663190016
author Lee, Sang Kyu
Huang, Sheng
Zhang, Lei
Ballangrud, Ase M.
Aristophanous, Michalis
Cervino Arriba, Laura I.
Li, Guang
author_facet Lee, Sang Kyu
Huang, Sheng
Zhang, Lei
Ballangrud, Ase M.
Aristophanous, Michalis
Cervino Arriba, Laura I.
Li, Guang
author_sort Lee, Sang Kyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of surface‐guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in cranial patient setup by direct comparison between optical surface imaging (OSI) and cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT), before applying SGRT‐only setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using CBCT as reference, SGRT setup accuracy was examined based on 269 patients (415 treatments) treated with frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) during 2018‐2019. Patients were immobilized in customized head molds and open‐face masks and monitored using OSI during treatment. The facial skin area in planning CT was used as OSI region of interest (ROI) for automatic surface alignment and the skull was used as the landmark for automatic CBCT/CT registration. A 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) couch was used. Immediately after CBCT setup, an OSI verification image was captured, recording the SGRT setup differences. These differences were analyzed in 6DOFs and as a function of isocenter positions away from the anterior surface to assess OSI‐ROI bias. The SGRT in‐room setup time was estimated and compared with CBCT and orthogonal 2D kilovoltage (2DkV) setups. RESULTS: The SGRT setup difference (magnitude) is found to be 1.0 ± 2.5 mm and 0.1˚±1.4˚ on average among 415 treatments and within 5 mm/3˚ with greater than 95% confidence level (P < 0.001). Outliers were observed for very‐posterior isocenters: 15 differences (3.6%) are >5.0mm and 9 (2.2%) are >3.0˚. The setup differences show minor correlations (|r| < 0.45) between translational and rotational DOFs and a minor increasing trend (<1.0 mm) in the anterior‐to‐posterior direction. The SGRT setup time is 0.8 ± 0.3 min, much shorter than CBCT (5 ± 2 min) and 2DkV (2 ± 1 min) setups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SGRT has sufficient accuracy for fast in‐room patient setup and allows real‐time motion monitoring for beam holding during treatment, potentially useful to guide radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer with standard fractionation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81302302021-05-21 Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer Lee, Sang Kyu Huang, Sheng Zhang, Lei Ballangrud, Ase M. Aristophanous, Michalis Cervino Arriba, Laura I. Li, Guang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of surface‐guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in cranial patient setup by direct comparison between optical surface imaging (OSI) and cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT), before applying SGRT‐only setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using CBCT as reference, SGRT setup accuracy was examined based on 269 patients (415 treatments) treated with frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) during 2018‐2019. Patients were immobilized in customized head molds and open‐face masks and monitored using OSI during treatment. The facial skin area in planning CT was used as OSI region of interest (ROI) for automatic surface alignment and the skull was used as the landmark for automatic CBCT/CT registration. A 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF) couch was used. Immediately after CBCT setup, an OSI verification image was captured, recording the SGRT setup differences. These differences were analyzed in 6DOFs and as a function of isocenter positions away from the anterior surface to assess OSI‐ROI bias. The SGRT in‐room setup time was estimated and compared with CBCT and orthogonal 2D kilovoltage (2DkV) setups. RESULTS: The SGRT setup difference (magnitude) is found to be 1.0 ± 2.5 mm and 0.1˚±1.4˚ on average among 415 treatments and within 5 mm/3˚ with greater than 95% confidence level (P < 0.001). Outliers were observed for very‐posterior isocenters: 15 differences (3.6%) are >5.0mm and 9 (2.2%) are >3.0˚. The setup differences show minor correlations (|r| < 0.45) between translational and rotational DOFs and a minor increasing trend (<1.0 mm) in the anterior‐to‐posterior direction. The SGRT setup time is 0.8 ± 0.3 min, much shorter than CBCT (5 ± 2 min) and 2DkV (2 ± 1 min) setups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that SGRT has sufficient accuracy for fast in‐room patient setup and allows real‐time motion monitoring for beam holding during treatment, potentially useful to guide radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer with standard fractionation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8130230/ /pubmed/33792186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13241 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Lee, Sang Kyu
Huang, Sheng
Zhang, Lei
Ballangrud, Ase M.
Aristophanous, Michalis
Cervino Arriba, Laura I.
Li, Guang
Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
title Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
title_full Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
title_fullStr Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
title_short Accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
title_sort accuracy of surface‐guided patient setup for conventional radiotherapy of brain and nasopharynx cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33792186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13241
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangkyu accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer
AT huangsheng accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer
AT zhanglei accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer
AT ballangrudasem accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer
AT aristophanousmichalis accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer
AT cervinoarribalaurai accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer
AT liguang accuracyofsurfaceguidedpatientsetupforconventionalradiotherapyofbrainandnasopharynxcancer