Cargando…

Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region

The aim of the study was to estimate and to compare effective doses in the elbow region resulting from four different x‐ray imaging modalities. Absorbed organ doses were measured using 11 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom‐made anthropomorphic elbow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koivisto, Juha, van Eijnatten, Maureen, Ludlow, John, Kiljunen, Timo, Shi, Xie‐Qi, Wolff, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33811787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13245
_version_ 1783694474951524352
author Koivisto, Juha
van Eijnatten, Maureen
Ludlow, John
Kiljunen, Timo
Shi, Xie‐Qi
Wolff, Jan
author_facet Koivisto, Juha
van Eijnatten, Maureen
Ludlow, John
Kiljunen, Timo
Shi, Xie‐Qi
Wolff, Jan
author_sort Koivisto, Juha
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to estimate and to compare effective doses in the elbow region resulting from four different x‐ray imaging modalities. Absorbed organ doses were measured using 11 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom‐made anthropomorphic elbow RANDO phantom. Examinations were performed using Shimadzu FH‐21 HR radiography device, Siemens Sensation Open 24‐slice MSCT‐device, NewTom 5G CBCT device, and Planmed Verity CBCT device, and the effective doses were calculated according to ICRP 103 recommendations. The effective dose for the conventional radiographic device was 1.5 µSv. The effective dose for the NewTom 5G CBCT ranged between 2.0 and 6.7 µSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT device 2.6 µSv and for the Siemens Sensation MSCT device 37.4 µSv. Compared with conventional 2D radiography, this study demonstrated a 1.4–4.6 fold increase in effective dose for CBCT and 25‐fold dose for standard MSCT protocols. When compared with 3D CBCT protocols, the study showed a 6‐19 fold increase in effective dose using a standard MSCT protocol. CBCT devices offer a feasible low‐dose alternative for elbow 3D imaging when compared to MSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81302422021-05-21 Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region Koivisto, Juha van Eijnatten, Maureen Ludlow, John Kiljunen, Timo Shi, Xie‐Qi Wolff, Jan J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The aim of the study was to estimate and to compare effective doses in the elbow region resulting from four different x‐ray imaging modalities. Absorbed organ doses were measured using 11 metal oxide field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters that were placed in a custom‐made anthropomorphic elbow RANDO phantom. Examinations were performed using Shimadzu FH‐21 HR radiography device, Siemens Sensation Open 24‐slice MSCT‐device, NewTom 5G CBCT device, and Planmed Verity CBCT device, and the effective doses were calculated according to ICRP 103 recommendations. The effective dose for the conventional radiographic device was 1.5 µSv. The effective dose for the NewTom 5G CBCT ranged between 2.0 and 6.7 µSv, for the Planmed Verity CBCT device 2.6 µSv and for the Siemens Sensation MSCT device 37.4 µSv. Compared with conventional 2D radiography, this study demonstrated a 1.4–4.6 fold increase in effective dose for CBCT and 25‐fold dose for standard MSCT protocols. When compared with 3D CBCT protocols, the study showed a 6‐19 fold increase in effective dose using a standard MSCT protocol. CBCT devices offer a feasible low‐dose alternative for elbow 3D imaging when compared to MSCT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8130242/ /pubmed/33811787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13245 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Koivisto, Juha
van Eijnatten, Maureen
Ludlow, John
Kiljunen, Timo
Shi, Xie‐Qi
Wolff, Jan
Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region
title Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region
title_full Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region
title_fullStr Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region
title_full_unstemmed Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region
title_short Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region
title_sort comparative dosimetry of radiography device, msct device and two cbct devices in the elbow region
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33811787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13245
work_keys_str_mv AT koivistojuha comparativedosimetryofradiographydevicemsctdeviceandtwocbctdevicesintheelbowregion
AT vaneijnattenmaureen comparativedosimetryofradiographydevicemsctdeviceandtwocbctdevicesintheelbowregion
AT ludlowjohn comparativedosimetryofradiographydevicemsctdeviceandtwocbctdevicesintheelbowregion
AT kiljunentimo comparativedosimetryofradiographydevicemsctdeviceandtwocbctdevicesintheelbowregion
AT shixieqi comparativedosimetryofradiographydevicemsctdeviceandtwocbctdevicesintheelbowregion
AT wolffjan comparativedosimetryofradiographydevicemsctdeviceandtwocbctdevicesintheelbowregion