Cargando…

Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare different system calibration methods from a large cohort of systems to establish a commissioning procedure for surface‐guided frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with intrafractional motion monitoring and gating. Using optical surface i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lei, Vijayan, Sarath, Huang, Sheng, Song, Yulin, Li, Tianfang, Li, Xiang, Hipp, Elizabeth, Chan, Maria F., Kuo, Hsiang‐Chi, Tang, Xiaoli, Tang, Grace, Lim, Seng Boh, Lovelock, Dale Michael, Ballangrud, Ase, Li, Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33779052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13240
_version_ 1783694475265048576
author Zhang, Lei
Vijayan, Sarath
Huang, Sheng
Song, Yulin
Li, Tianfang
Li, Xiang
Hipp, Elizabeth
Chan, Maria F.
Kuo, Hsiang‐Chi
Tang, Xiaoli
Tang, Grace
Lim, Seng Boh
Lovelock, Dale Michael
Ballangrud, Ase
Li, Guang
author_facet Zhang, Lei
Vijayan, Sarath
Huang, Sheng
Song, Yulin
Li, Tianfang
Li, Xiang
Hipp, Elizabeth
Chan, Maria F.
Kuo, Hsiang‐Chi
Tang, Xiaoli
Tang, Grace
Lim, Seng Boh
Lovelock, Dale Michael
Ballangrud, Ase
Li, Guang
author_sort Zhang, Lei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare different system calibration methods from a large cohort of systems to establish a commissioning procedure for surface‐guided frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with intrafractional motion monitoring and gating. Using optical surface imaging (OSI) to guide non‐coplanar SRS treatments, the determination of OSI couch‐angle dependency, baseline drift, and gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency are essential. METHODS: Eleven trained physicists evaluated 17 OSI systems at nine clinical centers within our institution. Three calibration methods were examined, including 1‐level (2D), 2‐level plate (3D) calibration for both surface image reconstruction and isocenter determination, and cube phantom calibration to assess OSI‐megavoltage (MV) isocenter concordance. After each calibration, a couch‐angle dependency error was measured as the maximum registration error within the couch rotation range. A head phantom was immobilized on the treatment couch and the isocenter was set in the middle of the brain, marked with the room lasers. An on‐site reference image was acquired at couch zero, the facial region of interest (ROI) was defined, and static verification images were captured every 10° for 0°–90° and 360°–270°. The baseline drift was assessed with real‐time monitoring of the motionless phantom over 20 min. The gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency was assessed using the electron portal imaging device and gamma test (1%/1mm) in reference to non‐gated delivery. RESULTS: The maximum couch‐angle dependency error occurs in longitudinal and lateral directions and is reduced significantly (P < 0.05) from 1‐level (1.3 ± 0.4 mm) to 2‐level (0.8 ± 0.3 mm) calibration. The MV cube calibration does not further reduce the couch‐angle dependency error (0.8 ± 0.2 mm) on average. The baseline drift error plateaus at 0.3 ± 0.1 mm after 10 min. The gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency has a >98% gamma‐test passing rate. CONCLUSION: A commissioning method is recommended using the 3D plate calibration, which is verified by radiation isocenter and validated with couch‐angle dependency, baseline drift, and gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency tests. This method characterizes OSI uncertainties, ensuring motion‐monitoring accuracy for SRS treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81302432021-05-21 Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery Zhang, Lei Vijayan, Sarath Huang, Sheng Song, Yulin Li, Tianfang Li, Xiang Hipp, Elizabeth Chan, Maria F. Kuo, Hsiang‐Chi Tang, Xiaoli Tang, Grace Lim, Seng Boh Lovelock, Dale Michael Ballangrud, Ase Li, Guang J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare different system calibration methods from a large cohort of systems to establish a commissioning procedure for surface‐guided frameless cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with intrafractional motion monitoring and gating. Using optical surface imaging (OSI) to guide non‐coplanar SRS treatments, the determination of OSI couch‐angle dependency, baseline drift, and gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency are essential. METHODS: Eleven trained physicists evaluated 17 OSI systems at nine clinical centers within our institution. Three calibration methods were examined, including 1‐level (2D), 2‐level plate (3D) calibration for both surface image reconstruction and isocenter determination, and cube phantom calibration to assess OSI‐megavoltage (MV) isocenter concordance. After each calibration, a couch‐angle dependency error was measured as the maximum registration error within the couch rotation range. A head phantom was immobilized on the treatment couch and the isocenter was set in the middle of the brain, marked with the room lasers. An on‐site reference image was acquired at couch zero, the facial region of interest (ROI) was defined, and static verification images were captured every 10° for 0°–90° and 360°–270°. The baseline drift was assessed with real‐time monitoring of the motionless phantom over 20 min. The gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency was assessed using the electron portal imaging device and gamma test (1%/1mm) in reference to non‐gated delivery. RESULTS: The maximum couch‐angle dependency error occurs in longitudinal and lateral directions and is reduced significantly (P < 0.05) from 1‐level (1.3 ± 0.4 mm) to 2‐level (0.8 ± 0.3 mm) calibration. The MV cube calibration does not further reduce the couch‐angle dependency error (0.8 ± 0.2 mm) on average. The baseline drift error plateaus at 0.3 ± 0.1 mm after 10 min. The gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency has a >98% gamma‐test passing rate. CONCLUSION: A commissioning method is recommended using the 3D plate calibration, which is verified by radiation isocenter and validated with couch‐angle dependency, baseline drift, and gated‐delivered‐dose equivalency tests. This method characterizes OSI uncertainties, ensuring motion‐monitoring accuracy for SRS treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8130243/ /pubmed/33779052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13240 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Zhang, Lei
Vijayan, Sarath
Huang, Sheng
Song, Yulin
Li, Tianfang
Li, Xiang
Hipp, Elizabeth
Chan, Maria F.
Kuo, Hsiang‐Chi
Tang, Xiaoli
Tang, Grace
Lim, Seng Boh
Lovelock, Dale Michael
Ballangrud, Ase
Li, Guang
Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
title Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
title_full Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
title_fullStr Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
title_short Commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
title_sort commissioning of optical surface imaging systems for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33779052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13240
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglei commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT vijayansarath commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT huangsheng commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT songyulin commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT litianfang commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT lixiang commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT hippelizabeth commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT chanmariaf commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT kuohsiangchi commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT tangxiaoli commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT tanggrace commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT limsengboh commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT lovelockdalemichael commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT ballangrudase commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery
AT liguang commissioningofopticalsurfaceimagingsystemsforcranialframelessstereotacticradiosurgery