Cargando…

The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) weakening or tears occur in 16% of professional baseball pitchers. To prevent players from sustaining a UCL injury, it is important to understand the relationship between the UCL properties and elbow stabilizers with the load on the UCL during pitching. In-vitro studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Trigt, Bart, Vliegen, Liset (W), Leenen, Ton (Ajr), Veeger, DirkJan (Hej)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33998377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2021.1916405
_version_ 1783694577893376000
author Van Trigt, Bart
Vliegen, Liset (W)
Leenen, Ton (Ajr)
Veeger, DirkJan (Hej)
author_facet Van Trigt, Bart
Vliegen, Liset (W)
Leenen, Ton (Ajr)
Veeger, DirkJan (Hej)
author_sort Van Trigt, Bart
collection PubMed
description Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) weakening or tears occur in 16% of professional baseball pitchers. To prevent players from sustaining a UCL injury, it is important to understand the relationship between the UCL properties and elbow stabilizers with the load on the UCL during pitching. In-vitro studies showed that the ultimate external valgus torque of 34 Nm would rupture the UCL, which is in apparent conflict with the reported peak valgus torques in pitching (40–120 Nm). Assuming both observations are correct, the question rises why ‘only’ 16 out of 100 professional pitchers sustain a UCL rupture. Underestimation of the effect of other structures in in-vivo studies is most likely the explanation of this mismatch because the calculated in-vivo torque also includes possible contributions of functional and structural stabilizers. In-vitro studies show that the flexor-pronator mass has the potential to counteract valgus torque directly, whereas the elbow flexor-extensor muscles combined with the humeroradial joint might have an indirect effect on valgus torque by increasing the joint compression force. Accurate experimental electromyography data and a more detailed (musculoskeletal)mechanical model of the elbow are needed to investigate if and to what extent the structural and functional stabilizers can shield the UCL during pitching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8130712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81307122021-06-15 The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review) Van Trigt, Bart Vliegen, Liset (W) Leenen, Ton (Ajr) Veeger, DirkJan (Hej) Int Biomech Review Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) weakening or tears occur in 16% of professional baseball pitchers. To prevent players from sustaining a UCL injury, it is important to understand the relationship between the UCL properties and elbow stabilizers with the load on the UCL during pitching. In-vitro studies showed that the ultimate external valgus torque of 34 Nm would rupture the UCL, which is in apparent conflict with the reported peak valgus torques in pitching (40–120 Nm). Assuming both observations are correct, the question rises why ‘only’ 16 out of 100 professional pitchers sustain a UCL rupture. Underestimation of the effect of other structures in in-vivo studies is most likely the explanation of this mismatch because the calculated in-vivo torque also includes possible contributions of functional and structural stabilizers. In-vitro studies show that the flexor-pronator mass has the potential to counteract valgus torque directly, whereas the elbow flexor-extensor muscles combined with the humeroradial joint might have an indirect effect on valgus torque by increasing the joint compression force. Accurate experimental electromyography data and a more detailed (musculoskeletal)mechanical model of the elbow are needed to investigate if and to what extent the structural and functional stabilizers can shield the UCL during pitching. Taylor & Francis 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8130712/ /pubmed/33998377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2021.1916405 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Van Trigt, Bart
Vliegen, Liset (W)
Leenen, Ton (Ajr)
Veeger, DirkJan (Hej)
The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
title The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
title_full The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
title_fullStr The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
title_full_unstemmed The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
title_short The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
title_sort ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8130712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33998377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2021.1916405
work_keys_str_mv AT vantrigtbart theulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT vliegenlisetw theulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT leenentonajr theulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT veegerdirkjanhej theulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT vantrigtbart ulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT vliegenlisetw ulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT leenentonajr ulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview
AT veegerdirkjanhej ulnarcollateralligamentloadingparadoxbetweeninvitroandinvivostudiesonbaseballpitchingnarrativereview