Cargando…
The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness
OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation has become a well-accepted treatment option for people with single-sided deafness (SSD) and has become a clinical standard in many countries. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which restores binaural hearing. The effect of microphone directionality (MD) sett...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06450-5 |
_version_ | 1783694680557355008 |
---|---|
author | Kurz, Anja Zanzinger, Maren Hagen, Rudolf Rak, Kristen |
author_facet | Kurz, Anja Zanzinger, Maren Hagen, Rudolf Rak, Kristen |
author_sort | Kurz, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation has become a well-accepted treatment option for people with single-sided deafness (SSD) and has become a clinical standard in many countries. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which restores binaural hearing. The effect of microphone directionality (MD) settings has been investigated in other CI indication groups, but its impact on speech perception in noise has not been established in CI users with SSD. The focus of this investigation was, therefore, to assess binaural hearing effects using different MD settings in CI users with SSD. METHODS: Twenty-nine experienced CI users with SSD were recruited to determine speech reception thresholds with varying target and noise sources to define binaural effects (head shadow, squelch, summation, and spatial release from masking), sound localization, and sound quality using the SSQ12 and HISQUI(19) questionnaires. Outcome measures included the MD settings “natural”, “adaptive”, and “omnidirectional”. RESULTS: The 29 participants involved in the study were divided into two groups: 11 SONNET users and 18 OPUS 2/RONDO users. In both groups, a significant head shadow effect of 7.4–9.2 dB was achieved with the CI. The MD setting “adaptive” provided a significant head shadow effect of 9.2 dB, a squelch effect of 0.9 dB, and spatial release from masking of 7.6 dB in the SONNET group. No significant summation effect could be determined in either group with CI. Outcomes with the omnidirectional setting were not significantly different between groups. For both groups, localization improved significantly when the CI was activated and was best when the omnidirectional setting was used. The groups’ sound quality scores did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive directional microphone settings improve speech perception and binaural hearing abilities in CI users with SSD. Binaural effect measures are valuable to quantify the benefit of CI use, especially in this indication group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8131307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81313072021-05-24 The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness Kurz, Anja Zanzinger, Maren Hagen, Rudolf Rak, Kristen Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Miscellaneous OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation has become a well-accepted treatment option for people with single-sided deafness (SSD) and has become a clinical standard in many countries. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which restores binaural hearing. The effect of microphone directionality (MD) settings has been investigated in other CI indication groups, but its impact on speech perception in noise has not been established in CI users with SSD. The focus of this investigation was, therefore, to assess binaural hearing effects using different MD settings in CI users with SSD. METHODS: Twenty-nine experienced CI users with SSD were recruited to determine speech reception thresholds with varying target and noise sources to define binaural effects (head shadow, squelch, summation, and spatial release from masking), sound localization, and sound quality using the SSQ12 and HISQUI(19) questionnaires. Outcome measures included the MD settings “natural”, “adaptive”, and “omnidirectional”. RESULTS: The 29 participants involved in the study were divided into two groups: 11 SONNET users and 18 OPUS 2/RONDO users. In both groups, a significant head shadow effect of 7.4–9.2 dB was achieved with the CI. The MD setting “adaptive” provided a significant head shadow effect of 9.2 dB, a squelch effect of 0.9 dB, and spatial release from masking of 7.6 dB in the SONNET group. No significant summation effect could be determined in either group with CI. Outcomes with the omnidirectional setting were not significantly different between groups. For both groups, localization improved significantly when the CI was activated and was best when the omnidirectional setting was used. The groups’ sound quality scores did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive directional microphone settings improve speech perception and binaural hearing abilities in CI users with SSD. Binaural effect measures are valuable to quantify the benefit of CI use, especially in this indication group. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8131307/ /pubmed/33141254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06450-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Miscellaneous Kurz, Anja Zanzinger, Maren Hagen, Rudolf Rak, Kristen The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
title | The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
title_full | The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
title_fullStr | The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
title_short | The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
title_sort | impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness |
topic | Miscellaneous |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33141254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06450-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurzanja theimpactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT zanzingermaren theimpactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT hagenrudolf theimpactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT rakkristen theimpactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT kurzanja impactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT zanzingermaren impactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT hagenrudolf impactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness AT rakkristen impactofcochlearimplantmicrophonesettingsonthebinauralhearingofexperiencedcochlearimplantuserswithsinglesideddeafness |