Cargando…

Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)

BACKGROUND: The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to show that the liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans by adding the liver vein to cava attenuation (LVCA) to the liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obmann, V. C., Marx, C., Hrycyk, J., Berzigotti, A., Ebner, L., Mertineit, N., Gräni, Ch., Heverhagen, J. T., Christe, A., Huber, A. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02834-7
_version_ 1783694687279775744
author Obmann, V. C.
Marx, C.
Hrycyk, J.
Berzigotti, A.
Ebner, L.
Mertineit, N.
Gräni, Ch.
Heverhagen, J. T.
Christe, A.
Huber, A. T.
author_facet Obmann, V. C.
Marx, C.
Hrycyk, J.
Berzigotti, A.
Ebner, L.
Mertineit, N.
Gräni, Ch.
Heverhagen, J. T.
Christe, A.
Huber, A. T.
author_sort Obmann, V. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to show that the liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans by adding the liver vein to cava attenuation (LVCA) to the liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent portal venous phase abdominal CT scans and MR elastography (reference standard) within 3 months between 02/2016 and 05/2017 were included. The LSVAR was calculated on portal venous CT scans as LSVR*LVCA, while the LSVR represented the volume ratio between Couinaud segments I-III and IV-VIII, and the LVCA represented the density of the liver veins compared to the density in the vena cava. The LSVAR and LSVR were compared between patients with and without significantly elevated liver stiffness (based on a cutoff value of 3.5 kPa) using the Mann–Whitney U test and ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The LSVR and LSVAR allowed significant differentiation between patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 122) significantly elevated liver stiffness (p < 0.001). However, the LSVAR showed a higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.96) than the LSVR (AUC = 0.74). The optimal cutoff value was 0.34 for the LSVR, which detected clinically increased liver stiffness with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 88%. With a cutoff value of 0.67 for the LSVAR, the sensitivity increased to 95% while maintaining a specificity of 89%. CONCLUSION: The LSVAR improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans compared to the LSVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8131336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81313362021-05-24 Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR) Obmann, V. C. Marx, C. Hrycyk, J. Berzigotti, A. Ebner, L. Mertineit, N. Gräni, Ch. Heverhagen, J. T. Christe, A. Huber, A. T. Abdom Radiol (NY) Hepatobiliary BACKGROUND: The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to show that the liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans by adding the liver vein to cava attenuation (LVCA) to the liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent portal venous phase abdominal CT scans and MR elastography (reference standard) within 3 months between 02/2016 and 05/2017 were included. The LSVAR was calculated on portal venous CT scans as LSVR*LVCA, while the LSVR represented the volume ratio between Couinaud segments I-III and IV-VIII, and the LVCA represented the density of the liver veins compared to the density in the vena cava. The LSVAR and LSVR were compared between patients with and without significantly elevated liver stiffness (based on a cutoff value of 3.5 kPa) using the Mann–Whitney U test and ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The LSVR and LSVAR allowed significant differentiation between patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 122) significantly elevated liver stiffness (p < 0.001). However, the LSVAR showed a higher area under the curve (AUC = 0.96) than the LSVR (AUC = 0.74). The optimal cutoff value was 0.34 for the LSVR, which detected clinically increased liver stiffness with a sensitivity of 53% and a specificity of 88%. With a cutoff value of 0.67 for the LSVAR, the sensitivity increased to 95% while maintaining a specificity of 89%. CONCLUSION: The LSVAR improves the detection of significant liver fibrosis on portal venous CT scans compared to the LSVR. Springer US 2020-11-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8131336/ /pubmed/33156949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02834-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary
Obmann, V. C.
Marx, C.
Hrycyk, J.
Berzigotti, A.
Ebner, L.
Mertineit, N.
Gräni, Ch.
Heverhagen, J. T.
Christe, A.
Huber, A. T.
Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)
title Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)
title_full Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)
title_fullStr Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)
title_full_unstemmed Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)
title_short Liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (LSVAR) on portal venous CT scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR)
title_sort liver segmental volume and attenuation ratio (lsvar) on portal venous ct scans improves the detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis compared to liver segmental volume ratio (lsvr)
topic Hepatobiliary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33156949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02834-7
work_keys_str_mv AT obmannvc liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT marxc liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT hrycykj liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT berzigottia liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT ebnerl liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT mertineitn liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT granich liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT heverhagenjt liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT christea liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr
AT huberat liversegmentalvolumeandattenuationratiolsvaronportalvenousctscansimprovesthedetectionofclinicallysignificantliverfibrosiscomparedtoliversegmentalvolumeratiolsvr