Cargando…

How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models

1. Species distribution modeling, which allows users to predict the spatial distribution of species with the use of environmental covariates, has become increasingly popular, with many software platforms providing tools to fit such models. However, the species observations used can have varying leve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guilbault, Emy, Renner, Ian, Mahony, Michael, Beh, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7411
_version_ 1783694780032614400
author Guilbault, Emy
Renner, Ian
Mahony, Michael
Beh, Eric
author_facet Guilbault, Emy
Renner, Ian
Mahony, Michael
Beh, Eric
author_sort Guilbault, Emy
collection PubMed
description 1. Species distribution modeling, which allows users to predict the spatial distribution of species with the use of environmental covariates, has become increasingly popular, with many software platforms providing tools to fit such models. However, the species observations used can have varying levels of quality and can have incomplete information, such as uncertain or unknown species identity. 2. In this paper, we develop two algorithms to classify observations with unknown species identities which simultaneously predict several species distributions using spatial point processes. Through simulations, we compare the performance of these algorithms using 7 different initializations to the performance of models fitted using only the observations with known species identity. 3. We show that performance varies with differences in correlation among species distributions, species abundance, and the proportion of observations with unknown species identities. Additionally, some of the methods developed here outperformed the models that did not use the misspecified data. We applied the best‐performing methods to a dataset of three frog species (Mixophyes). 4. These models represent a helpful and promising tool for opportunistic surveys where misidentification is possible or for the distribution of species newly separated in their taxonomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8131797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81317972021-05-21 How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models Guilbault, Emy Renner, Ian Mahony, Michael Beh, Eric Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Species distribution modeling, which allows users to predict the spatial distribution of species with the use of environmental covariates, has become increasingly popular, with many software platforms providing tools to fit such models. However, the species observations used can have varying levels of quality and can have incomplete information, such as uncertain or unknown species identity. 2. In this paper, we develop two algorithms to classify observations with unknown species identities which simultaneously predict several species distributions using spatial point processes. Through simulations, we compare the performance of these algorithms using 7 different initializations to the performance of models fitted using only the observations with known species identity. 3. We show that performance varies with differences in correlation among species distributions, species abundance, and the proportion of observations with unknown species identities. Additionally, some of the methods developed here outperformed the models that did not use the misspecified data. We applied the best‐performing methods to a dataset of three frog species (Mixophyes). 4. These models represent a helpful and promising tool for opportunistic surveys where misidentification is possible or for the distribution of species newly separated in their taxonomy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8131797/ /pubmed/34026002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7411 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Guilbault, Emy
Renner, Ian
Mahony, Michael
Beh, Eric
How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
title How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
title_full How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
title_fullStr How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
title_full_unstemmed How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
title_short How to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
title_sort how to make use of unlabeled observations in species distribution modeling using point process models
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7411
work_keys_str_mv AT guilbaultemy howtomakeuseofunlabeledobservationsinspeciesdistributionmodelingusingpointprocessmodels
AT rennerian howtomakeuseofunlabeledobservationsinspeciesdistributionmodelingusingpointprocessmodels
AT mahonymichael howtomakeuseofunlabeledobservationsinspeciesdistributionmodelingusingpointprocessmodels
AT beheric howtomakeuseofunlabeledobservationsinspeciesdistributionmodelingusingpointprocessmodels