Cargando…
How best to quantify replication success? A simulation study on the comparison of replication success metrics
To overcome the frequently debated crisis of confidence, replicating studies is becoming increasingly more common. Multiple frequentist and Bayesian measures have been proposed to evaluate whether a replication is successful, but little is known about which method best captures replication success....
Autores principales: | Muradchanian, Jasmine, Hoekstra, Rink, Kiers, Henk, van Ravenzwaaij, Don |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201697 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The role of results in deciding to publish: A direct comparison across authors, reviewers, and editors based on an online survey
por: Muradchanian, Jasmine, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report
por: Field, Sarahanne M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
When numbers fail: do researchers agree on operationalization of published research?
por: Haucke, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The tainted altruism effect: a successful pre-registered replication
por: Alcala, Valerie, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups
por: Wintle, Bonnie C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)