Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation

Introduction: Pin site infection is a common complication to external ring fixation. While the aetiology is well described, monitoring of onset, location, and the distribution of infection among the pin sites still needs further attention. The present pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bue, Mats, Bjarnason, Arnar Óskar, Rölfing, Jan Duedal, Larsen, Karina, Petruskevicius, Juozas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084702
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-135-2021
_version_ 1783694820329390080
author Bue, Mats
Bjarnason, Arnar Óskar
Rölfing, Jan Duedal
Larsen, Karina
Petruskevicius, Juozas
author_facet Bue, Mats
Bjarnason, Arnar Óskar
Rölfing, Jan Duedal
Larsen, Karina
Petruskevicius, Juozas
author_sort Bue, Mats
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Pin site infection is a common complication to external ring fixation. While the aetiology is well described, monitoring of onset, location, and the distribution of infection among the pin sites still needs further attention. The present pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a prospective registration procedure for reporting, evaluating, and monitoring of pin site infections in patients treated with external ring fixation. This may promote communication between team members and assist decision-making regarding treatment. Methods: A total of 39 trauma, limb deformity, and bone infection patients (15 female, 24 males; mean age 49 years (range: 12–88)) treated with external ring fixation were followed in the outpatient clinic using the pin site registration tool. Pin site infection (Checketts and Otterburn (CO) grade, onset, location), use of oral or intravenous antibiotics, and any unplanned procedures due to pin sites complications (wire removal and/or replacement, premature frame removal, amputation, etc.) were registered until frame removal. Results: The mean (SD) frame time was 164 (83) d (range: 44–499). We performed 3296 observations of 568 pin sites. Pin infection was registered in 171 of the 568 pin sites (30 %), of which 112 (65 %) were categorized as CO 1, 42 (25 %) as CO 2, 9 (5 %) as CO 3, and 8 (5 %) as CO 5. Neither CO 4 nor CO 6 was observed. A total of 35 patients (90 %) encountered CO 1–3 at least once during the observation time, while 1 patient (2.5 %) developed a major infection at eight pin sites (CO 5). Antibiotics were administered to [Formula: see text] (56 %) of the patients. Conclusion: In an effort to monitor pin site infections in this complex patient group and to ensure the best clinical outcomes, our registration procedure in the outpatient clinic helped to recognize pin site infections early and eased communication between team members providing a concise overview of the treatment course.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8131963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81319632021-06-02 Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation Bue, Mats Bjarnason, Arnar Óskar Rölfing, Jan Duedal Larsen, Karina Petruskevicius, Juozas J Bone Jt Infect Original Full-Length Article Introduction: Pin site infection is a common complication to external ring fixation. While the aetiology is well described, monitoring of onset, location, and the distribution of infection among the pin sites still needs further attention. The present pilot study evaluates the feasibility of a prospective registration procedure for reporting, evaluating, and monitoring of pin site infections in patients treated with external ring fixation. This may promote communication between team members and assist decision-making regarding treatment. Methods: A total of 39 trauma, limb deformity, and bone infection patients (15 female, 24 males; mean age 49 years (range: 12–88)) treated with external ring fixation were followed in the outpatient clinic using the pin site registration tool. Pin site infection (Checketts and Otterburn (CO) grade, onset, location), use of oral or intravenous antibiotics, and any unplanned procedures due to pin sites complications (wire removal and/or replacement, premature frame removal, amputation, etc.) were registered until frame removal. Results: The mean (SD) frame time was 164 (83) d (range: 44–499). We performed 3296 observations of 568 pin sites. Pin infection was registered in 171 of the 568 pin sites (30 %), of which 112 (65 %) were categorized as CO 1, 42 (25 %) as CO 2, 9 (5 %) as CO 3, and 8 (5 %) as CO 5. Neither CO 4 nor CO 6 was observed. A total of 35 patients (90 %) encountered CO 1–3 at least once during the observation time, while 1 patient (2.5 %) developed a major infection at eight pin sites (CO 5). Antibiotics were administered to [Formula: see text] (56 %) of the patients. Conclusion: In an effort to monitor pin site infections in this complex patient group and to ensure the best clinical outcomes, our registration procedure in the outpatient clinic helped to recognize pin site infections early and eased communication between team members providing a concise overview of the treatment course. Copernicus GmbH 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8131963/ /pubmed/34084702 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-135-2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Mats Bue et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Full-Length Article
Bue, Mats
Bjarnason, Arnar Óskar
Rölfing, Jan Duedal
Larsen, Karina
Petruskevicius, Juozas
Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
title Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
title_full Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
title_short Prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
title_sort prospective evaluation of pin site infections in 39 patients treated with external ring fixation
topic Original Full-Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8131963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084702
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-6-135-2021
work_keys_str_mv AT buemats prospectiveevaluationofpinsiteinfectionsin39patientstreatedwithexternalringfixation
AT bjarnasonarnaroskar prospectiveevaluationofpinsiteinfectionsin39patientstreatedwithexternalringfixation
AT rolfingjanduedal prospectiveevaluationofpinsiteinfectionsin39patientstreatedwithexternalringfixation
AT larsenkarina prospectiveevaluationofpinsiteinfectionsin39patientstreatedwithexternalringfixation
AT petruskeviciusjuozas prospectiveevaluationofpinsiteinfectionsin39patientstreatedwithexternalringfixation