Cargando…

Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings

Dutch 17(th) century painters were masters in depicting materials and their properties in a convincing way. Here, we studied the perception of the material signatures and key image features of different depicted fabrics, like satin and velvet. We also tested whether the perception of fabrics depicte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Cicco, Francesca, van Zuijlen, Mitchell J. P., Wijntjes, Maarten W. A., Pont, Sylvia C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.10
_version_ 1783694831542861824
author Di Cicco, Francesca
van Zuijlen, Mitchell J. P.
Wijntjes, Maarten W. A.
Pont, Sylvia C.
author_facet Di Cicco, Francesca
van Zuijlen, Mitchell J. P.
Wijntjes, Maarten W. A.
Pont, Sylvia C.
author_sort Di Cicco, Francesca
collection PubMed
description Dutch 17(th) century painters were masters in depicting materials and their properties in a convincing way. Here, we studied the perception of the material signatures and key image features of different depicted fabrics, like satin and velvet. We also tested whether the perception of fabrics depicted in paintings related to local or global cues, by cropping the stimuli. In Experiment 1, roughness, warmth, softness, heaviness, hairiness, and shininess were rated for the stimuli shown either full figure or cropped. In the full figure, all attributes except shininess were rated higher for velvet, whereas shininess was rated higher for satin. This distinction was less clear in the cropped condition, and some properties were perceived significantly different between the two conditions. In Experiment 2 we tested whether this difference was due to the choice of the cropped area. On the basis of the results of Experiment 1, shininess and softness were rated for multiple crops from each fabric. Most crops from the same fabric differed significantly in shininess, but not in softness perception. Perceived shininess correlated positively with the mean luminance of the crops and the highlights’ coverage. Experiment 1 showed that painted velvet and satin triggered distinct perceptions, indicative of robust material signatures of the two fabrics. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the presence of local image cues affects the perception of optical properties like shininess, but not mechanical properties such as softness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8132013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81320132021-05-24 Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings Di Cicco, Francesca van Zuijlen, Mitchell J. P. Wijntjes, Maarten W. A. Pont, Sylvia C. J Vis Article Dutch 17(th) century painters were masters in depicting materials and their properties in a convincing way. Here, we studied the perception of the material signatures and key image features of different depicted fabrics, like satin and velvet. We also tested whether the perception of fabrics depicted in paintings related to local or global cues, by cropping the stimuli. In Experiment 1, roughness, warmth, softness, heaviness, hairiness, and shininess were rated for the stimuli shown either full figure or cropped. In the full figure, all attributes except shininess were rated higher for velvet, whereas shininess was rated higher for satin. This distinction was less clear in the cropped condition, and some properties were perceived significantly different between the two conditions. In Experiment 2 we tested whether this difference was due to the choice of the cropped area. On the basis of the results of Experiment 1, shininess and softness were rated for multiple crops from each fabric. Most crops from the same fabric differed significantly in shininess, but not in softness perception. Perceived shininess correlated positively with the mean luminance of the crops and the highlights’ coverage. Experiment 1 showed that painted velvet and satin triggered distinct perceptions, indicative of robust material signatures of the two fabrics. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the presence of local image cues affects the perception of optical properties like shininess, but not mechanical properties such as softness. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8132013/ /pubmed/33978685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.10 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Di Cicco, Francesca
van Zuijlen, Mitchell J. P.
Wijntjes, Maarten W. A.
Pont, Sylvia C.
Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
title Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
title_full Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
title_fullStr Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
title_full_unstemmed Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
title_short Soft like velvet and shiny like satin: Perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
title_sort soft like velvet and shiny like satin: perceptual material signatures of fabrics depicted in 17(th) century paintings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.10
work_keys_str_mv AT diciccofrancesca softlikevelvetandshinylikesatinperceptualmaterialsignaturesoffabricsdepictedin17thcenturypaintings
AT vanzuijlenmitchelljp softlikevelvetandshinylikesatinperceptualmaterialsignaturesoffabricsdepictedin17thcenturypaintings
AT wijntjesmaartenwa softlikevelvetandshinylikesatinperceptualmaterialsignaturesoffabricsdepictedin17thcenturypaintings
AT pontsylviac softlikevelvetandshinylikesatinperceptualmaterialsignaturesoffabricsdepictedin17thcenturypaintings