Cargando…
The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman’s uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1 |
_version_ | 1783694896781066240 |
---|---|
author | Farrington, Elise Connolly, Mairead Phung, Laura Wilson, Alyce N. Comrie-Thomson, Liz Bohren, Meghan A. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. |
author_facet | Farrington, Elise Connolly, Mairead Phung, Laura Wilson, Alyce N. Comrie-Thomson, Liz Bohren, Meghan A. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. |
author_sort | Farrington, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman’s uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth vaginally at health facilities. METHODS: The population of interest were women who experienced labour in a health facility and in whom vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was the use of fundal pressure during second stage of labour. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Index Medicus databases were searched for eligible studies published from 1 January 2000 onwards. Meta-analysis was conducted to determine a pooled prevalence, with subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighty data sets from 76 studies (n = 898,544 women) were included, reporting data from 22 countries. The prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6% to 69.2% between studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2% (95% CI 19.4–27.0, I(2) = 99.97%). There were significant differences in prevalence between country income level (p < 0.001, prevalence highest in lower-middle income countries) and method of measuring use of fundal pressure (p = 0.001, prevalence highest in studies that measured fundal pressure based on women’s self-report). CONCLUSIONS: The use of uterine fundal pressure on women during vaginal birth in health facilities is widespread. Efforts to prevent this potentially unnecessary and harmful practice are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8132352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81323522021-05-19 The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis Farrington, Elise Connolly, Mairead Phung, Laura Wilson, Alyce N. Comrie-Thomson, Liz Bohren, Meghan A. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. Reprod Health Review BACKGROUND: Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman’s uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth vaginally at health facilities. METHODS: The population of interest were women who experienced labour in a health facility and in whom vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was the use of fundal pressure during second stage of labour. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Index Medicus databases were searched for eligible studies published from 1 January 2000 onwards. Meta-analysis was conducted to determine a pooled prevalence, with subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighty data sets from 76 studies (n = 898,544 women) were included, reporting data from 22 countries. The prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6% to 69.2% between studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2% (95% CI 19.4–27.0, I(2) = 99.97%). There were significant differences in prevalence between country income level (p < 0.001, prevalence highest in lower-middle income countries) and method of measuring use of fundal pressure (p = 0.001, prevalence highest in studies that measured fundal pressure based on women’s self-report). CONCLUSIONS: The use of uterine fundal pressure on women during vaginal birth in health facilities is widespread. Efforts to prevent this potentially unnecessary and harmful practice are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1. BioMed Central 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8132352/ /pubmed/34006288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Farrington, Elise Connolly, Mairead Phung, Laura Wilson, Alyce N. Comrie-Thomson, Liz Bohren, Meghan A. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farringtonelise theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT connollymairead theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT phunglaura theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wilsonalycen theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT comriethomsonliz theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bohrenmeghana theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT homercarolinese theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vogeljoshuap theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT farringtonelise prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT connollymairead prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT phunglaura prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wilsonalycen prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT comriethomsonliz prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bohrenmeghana prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT homercarolinese prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vogeljoshuap prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |