Cargando…

The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman’s uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farrington, Elise, Connolly, Mairead, Phung, Laura, Wilson, Alyce N., Comrie-Thomson, Liz, Bohren, Meghan A., Homer, Caroline S. E., Vogel, Joshua P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1
_version_ 1783694896781066240
author Farrington, Elise
Connolly, Mairead
Phung, Laura
Wilson, Alyce N.
Comrie-Thomson, Liz
Bohren, Meghan A.
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Vogel, Joshua P.
author_facet Farrington, Elise
Connolly, Mairead
Phung, Laura
Wilson, Alyce N.
Comrie-Thomson, Liz
Bohren, Meghan A.
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Vogel, Joshua P.
author_sort Farrington, Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman’s uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth vaginally at health facilities. METHODS: The population of interest were women who experienced labour in a health facility and in whom vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was the use of fundal pressure during second stage of labour. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Index Medicus databases were searched for eligible studies published from 1 January 2000 onwards. Meta-analysis was conducted to determine a pooled prevalence, with subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighty data sets from 76 studies (n = 898,544 women) were included, reporting data from 22 countries. The prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6% to 69.2% between studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2% (95% CI 19.4–27.0, I(2) = 99.97%). There were significant differences in prevalence between country income level (p < 0.001, prevalence highest in lower-middle income countries) and method of measuring use of fundal pressure (p = 0.001, prevalence highest in studies that measured fundal pressure based on women’s self-report). CONCLUSIONS: The use of uterine fundal pressure on women during vaginal birth in health facilities is widespread. Efforts to prevent this potentially unnecessary and harmful practice are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8132352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81323522021-05-19 The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis Farrington, Elise Connolly, Mairead Phung, Laura Wilson, Alyce N. Comrie-Thomson, Liz Bohren, Meghan A. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. Reprod Health Review BACKGROUND: Uterine fundal pressure involves a birth attendant pushing on the woman’s uterine fundus to assist vaginal birth. It is used in some clinical settings, though guidelines recommend against it. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth vaginally at health facilities. METHODS: The population of interest were women who experienced labour in a health facility and in whom vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was the use of fundal pressure during second stage of labour. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Index Medicus databases were searched for eligible studies published from 1 January 2000 onwards. Meta-analysis was conducted to determine a pooled prevalence, with subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eighty data sets from 76 studies (n = 898,544 women) were included, reporting data from 22 countries. The prevalence of fundal pressure ranged from 0.6% to 69.2% between studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23.2% (95% CI 19.4–27.0, I(2) = 99.97%). There were significant differences in prevalence between country income level (p < 0.001, prevalence highest in lower-middle income countries) and method of measuring use of fundal pressure (p = 0.001, prevalence highest in studies that measured fundal pressure based on women’s self-report). CONCLUSIONS: The use of uterine fundal pressure on women during vaginal birth in health facilities is widespread. Efforts to prevent this potentially unnecessary and harmful practice are needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1. BioMed Central 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8132352/ /pubmed/34006288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Farrington, Elise
Connolly, Mairead
Phung, Laura
Wilson, Alyce N.
Comrie-Thomson, Liz
Bohren, Meghan A.
Homer, Caroline S. E.
Vogel, Joshua P.
The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01148-1
work_keys_str_mv AT farringtonelise theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT connollymairead theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phunglaura theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wilsonalycen theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT comriethomsonliz theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bohrenmeghana theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT homercarolinese theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vogeljoshuap theprevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farringtonelise prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT connollymairead prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phunglaura prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wilsonalycen prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT comriethomsonliz prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bohrenmeghana prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT homercarolinese prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vogeljoshuap prevalenceofuterinefundalpressureduringthesecondstageoflabourforwomengivingbirthinhealthfacilitiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis