Cargando…
Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w |
_version_ | 1783694899036553216 |
---|---|
author | Dennler, Cyrill Bauer, David E. Scheibler, Anne-Gita Spirig, José Götschi, Tobias Fürnstahl, Philipp Farshad, Mazda |
author_facet | Dennler, Cyrill Bauer, David E. Scheibler, Anne-Gita Spirig, José Götschi, Tobias Fürnstahl, Philipp Farshad, Mazda |
author_sort | Dennler, Cyrill |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially available AR head mounted device during orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Thirteen orthopedic surgeons from a Swiss university clinic performed 25 orthopedic surgical procedures wearing a holographic AR headset (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) providing complementary three-dimensional, patient specific anatomic information. The surgeon’s experience of using the device during surgery was recorded using a standardized 58-item questionnaire grading different aspects on a 100-point scale with anchor statements. RESULTS: Surgeons were generally satisfied with image quality (85 ± 17 points) and accuracy of the virtual objects (84 ± 19 point). Wearing the AR device was rated as fairly comfortable (79 ± 13 points). Functionality of voice commands (68 ± 20 points) and gestures (66 ± 20 points) provided less favorable results. The greatest potential in the use of the AR device was found for surgical correction of deformities (87 ± 15 points). Overall, surgeons were satisfied with the application of this novel technology (78 ± 20 points) and future access to it was demanded (75 ± 22 points). CONCLUSION: AR is a rapidly evolving technology with large potential in different surgical settings, offering the opportunity to provide a compact, low cost alternative requiring a minimum of infrastructure compared to conventional navigation systems. While surgeons where generally satisfied with image quality of the here tested head mounted AR device, some technical and ergonomic shortcomings were pointed out. This study serves as a proof of concept for the use of an AR head mounted device in a real-world sterile setting in orthopedic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8132365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81323652021-05-19 Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study Dennler, Cyrill Bauer, David E. Scheibler, Anne-Gita Spirig, José Götschi, Tobias Fürnstahl, Philipp Farshad, Mazda BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially available AR head mounted device during orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Thirteen orthopedic surgeons from a Swiss university clinic performed 25 orthopedic surgical procedures wearing a holographic AR headset (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) providing complementary three-dimensional, patient specific anatomic information. The surgeon’s experience of using the device during surgery was recorded using a standardized 58-item questionnaire grading different aspects on a 100-point scale with anchor statements. RESULTS: Surgeons were generally satisfied with image quality (85 ± 17 points) and accuracy of the virtual objects (84 ± 19 point). Wearing the AR device was rated as fairly comfortable (79 ± 13 points). Functionality of voice commands (68 ± 20 points) and gestures (66 ± 20 points) provided less favorable results. The greatest potential in the use of the AR device was found for surgical correction of deformities (87 ± 15 points). Overall, surgeons were satisfied with the application of this novel technology (78 ± 20 points) and future access to it was demanded (75 ± 22 points). CONCLUSION: AR is a rapidly evolving technology with large potential in different surgical settings, offering the opportunity to provide a compact, low cost alternative requiring a minimum of infrastructure compared to conventional navigation systems. While surgeons where generally satisfied with image quality of the here tested head mounted AR device, some technical and ergonomic shortcomings were pointed out. This study serves as a proof of concept for the use of an AR head mounted device in a real-world sterile setting in orthopedic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w. BioMed Central 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8132365/ /pubmed/34006234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dennler, Cyrill Bauer, David E. Scheibler, Anne-Gita Spirig, José Götschi, Tobias Fürnstahl, Philipp Farshad, Mazda Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
title | Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
title_full | Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
title_short | Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
title_sort | augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dennlercyrill augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy AT bauerdavide augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy AT scheiblerannegita augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy AT spirigjose augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy AT gotschitobias augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy AT furnstahlphilipp augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy AT farshadmazda augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy |