Cargando…

Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennler, Cyrill, Bauer, David E., Scheibler, Anne-Gita, Spirig, José, Götschi, Tobias, Fürnstahl, Philipp, Farshad, Mazda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w
_version_ 1783694899036553216
author Dennler, Cyrill
Bauer, David E.
Scheibler, Anne-Gita
Spirig, José
Götschi, Tobias
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Farshad, Mazda
author_facet Dennler, Cyrill
Bauer, David E.
Scheibler, Anne-Gita
Spirig, José
Götschi, Tobias
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Farshad, Mazda
author_sort Dennler, Cyrill
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially available AR head mounted device during orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Thirteen orthopedic surgeons from a Swiss university clinic performed 25 orthopedic surgical procedures wearing a holographic AR headset (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) providing complementary three-dimensional, patient specific anatomic information. The surgeon’s experience of using the device during surgery was recorded using a standardized 58-item questionnaire grading different aspects on a 100-point scale with anchor statements. RESULTS: Surgeons were generally satisfied with image quality (85 ± 17 points) and accuracy of the virtual objects (84 ± 19 point). Wearing the AR device was rated as fairly comfortable (79 ± 13 points). Functionality of voice commands (68 ± 20 points) and gestures (66 ± 20 points) provided less favorable results. The greatest potential in the use of the AR device was found for surgical correction of deformities (87 ± 15 points). Overall, surgeons were satisfied with the application of this novel technology (78 ± 20 points) and future access to it was demanded (75 ± 22 points). CONCLUSION: AR is a rapidly evolving technology with large potential in different surgical settings, offering the opportunity to provide a compact, low cost alternative requiring a minimum of infrastructure compared to conventional navigation systems. While surgeons where generally satisfied with image quality of the here tested head mounted AR device, some technical and ergonomic shortcomings were pointed out. This study serves as a proof of concept for the use of an AR head mounted device in a real-world sterile setting in orthopedic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8132365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81323652021-05-19 Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study Dennler, Cyrill Bauer, David E. Scheibler, Anne-Gita Spirig, José Götschi, Tobias Fürnstahl, Philipp Farshad, Mazda BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Augmented Reality (AR) is a rapidly emerging technology finding growing acceptance and application in different fields of surgery. Various studies have been performed evaluating the precision and accuracy of AR guided navigation. This study investigates the feasibility of a commercially available AR head mounted device during orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Thirteen orthopedic surgeons from a Swiss university clinic performed 25 orthopedic surgical procedures wearing a holographic AR headset (HoloLens, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) providing complementary three-dimensional, patient specific anatomic information. The surgeon’s experience of using the device during surgery was recorded using a standardized 58-item questionnaire grading different aspects on a 100-point scale with anchor statements. RESULTS: Surgeons were generally satisfied with image quality (85 ± 17 points) and accuracy of the virtual objects (84 ± 19 point). Wearing the AR device was rated as fairly comfortable (79 ± 13 points). Functionality of voice commands (68 ± 20 points) and gestures (66 ± 20 points) provided less favorable results. The greatest potential in the use of the AR device was found for surgical correction of deformities (87 ± 15 points). Overall, surgeons were satisfied with the application of this novel technology (78 ± 20 points) and future access to it was demanded (75 ± 22 points). CONCLUSION: AR is a rapidly evolving technology with large potential in different surgical settings, offering the opportunity to provide a compact, low cost alternative requiring a minimum of infrastructure compared to conventional navigation systems. While surgeons where generally satisfied with image quality of the here tested head mounted AR device, some technical and ergonomic shortcomings were pointed out. This study serves as a proof of concept for the use of an AR head mounted device in a real-world sterile setting in orthopedic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w. BioMed Central 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8132365/ /pubmed/34006234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dennler, Cyrill
Bauer, David E.
Scheibler, Anne-Gita
Spirig, José
Götschi, Tobias
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Farshad, Mazda
Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
title Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
title_full Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
title_fullStr Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
title_short Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
title_sort augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dennlercyrill augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT bauerdavide augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT scheiblerannegita augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT spirigjose augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT gotschitobias augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT furnstahlphilipp augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT farshadmazda augmentedrealityintheoperatingroomaclinicalfeasibilitystudy