Cargando…
A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of the artificial intelligence (AI) system in implant planning using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: Seventy-five CBCT images were included in this study. In these images, bone height and thickness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00618-z |
_version_ | 1783694900247658496 |
---|---|
author | Bayrakdar, Sevda Kurt Orhan, Kaan Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki Bilgir, Elif Ezhov, Matvey Gusarev, Maxim Shumilov, Eugene |
author_facet | Bayrakdar, Sevda Kurt Orhan, Kaan Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki Bilgir, Elif Ezhov, Matvey Gusarev, Maxim Shumilov, Eugene |
author_sort | Bayrakdar, Sevda Kurt |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of the artificial intelligence (AI) system in implant planning using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: Seventy-five CBCT images were included in this study. In these images, bone height and thickness in 508 regions where implants were required were measured by a human observer with manual assessment method using InvivoDental 6.0 (Anatomage Inc. San Jose, CA, USA). Also, canals/sinuses/fossae associated with alveolar bones and missing tooth regions were detected. Following, all evaluations were repeated using the deep convolutional neural network (Diagnocat, Inc., San Francisco, USA) The jaws were separated as mandible/maxilla and each jaw was grouped as anterior/premolar/molar teeth region. The data obtained from manual assessment and AI methods were compared using Bland–Altman analysis and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: In the bone height measurements, there were no statistically significant differences between AI and manual measurements in the premolar region of mandible and the premolar and molar regions of the maxilla (p > 0.05). In the bone thickness measurements, there were statistically significant differences between AI and manual measurements in all regions of maxilla and mandible (p < 0.001). Also, the percentage of right detection was 72.2% for canals, 66.4% for sinuses/fossae and 95.3% for missing tooth regions. CONCLUSIONS: Development of AI systems and their using in future for implant planning will both facilitate the work of physicians and will be a support mechanism in implantology practice to physicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8132372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81323722021-05-19 A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images Bayrakdar, Sevda Kurt Orhan, Kaan Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki Bilgir, Elif Ezhov, Matvey Gusarev, Maxim Shumilov, Eugene BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of the artificial intelligence (AI) system in implant planning using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: Seventy-five CBCT images were included in this study. In these images, bone height and thickness in 508 regions where implants were required were measured by a human observer with manual assessment method using InvivoDental 6.0 (Anatomage Inc. San Jose, CA, USA). Also, canals/sinuses/fossae associated with alveolar bones and missing tooth regions were detected. Following, all evaluations were repeated using the deep convolutional neural network (Diagnocat, Inc., San Francisco, USA) The jaws were separated as mandible/maxilla and each jaw was grouped as anterior/premolar/molar teeth region. The data obtained from manual assessment and AI methods were compared using Bland–Altman analysis and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: In the bone height measurements, there were no statistically significant differences between AI and manual measurements in the premolar region of mandible and the premolar and molar regions of the maxilla (p > 0.05). In the bone thickness measurements, there were statistically significant differences between AI and manual measurements in all regions of maxilla and mandible (p < 0.001). Also, the percentage of right detection was 72.2% for canals, 66.4% for sinuses/fossae and 95.3% for missing tooth regions. CONCLUSIONS: Development of AI systems and their using in future for implant planning will both facilitate the work of physicians and will be a support mechanism in implantology practice to physicians. BioMed Central 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8132372/ /pubmed/34011314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00618-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bayrakdar, Sevda Kurt Orhan, Kaan Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Sevki Bilgir, Elif Ezhov, Matvey Gusarev, Maxim Shumilov, Eugene A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
title | A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_full | A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_fullStr | A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_full_unstemmed | A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_short | A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
title_sort | deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00618-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bayrakdarsevdakurt adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT orhankaan adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT bayrakdaribrahimsevki adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT bilgirelif adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT ezhovmatvey adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT gusarevmaxim adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT shumiloveugene adeeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT bayrakdarsevdakurt deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT orhankaan deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT bayrakdaribrahimsevki deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT bilgirelif deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT ezhovmatvey deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT gusarevmaxim deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages AT shumiloveugene deeplearningapproachfordentalimplantplanninginconebeamcomputedtomographyimages |