Cargando…

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures and the operation is performed in a highly standardised manner under maintenance of highest infection precautions. Short operation times are important since longer duration of surgery can incr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leu, Severina, Halbeisen, Florian, Mariani, Luigi, Soleman, Jehuda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5
_version_ 1783694901205008384
author Leu, Severina
Halbeisen, Florian
Mariani, Luigi
Soleman, Jehuda
author_facet Leu, Severina
Halbeisen, Florian
Mariani, Luigi
Soleman, Jehuda
author_sort Leu, Severina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures and the operation is performed in a highly standardised manner under maintenance of highest infection precautions. Short operation times are important since longer duration of surgery can increase the risk for VPS complications, especially infections. The position of the proximal ventricular catheter influences shunt functioning and survival. With freehand placement, rates of malpositioned VPS are still high. Several navigation techniques for improvement of shunt placement have been developed. Studies comparing these techniques are sparse. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare ultrasound (US) guided to stereotactic navigated shunt placement using optical tracking with the focus on operation time and efficiency. METHODS: In this prospective randomised, single-centre, partially-blinded study, we will include all patients undergoing VPS placement in our clinic. The patients will be randomised into two groups, one group undergoing US-guided (US-G) and the other group stereotactic navigated VPS placement using optical tracking. The primary outcome will be the surgical intervention time. This time span consists of the surgical preparation time together with the operation time and is given in minutes. Secondary outcomes will be accuracy of catheter positioning, VPS dysfunction and need for revision surgery, total operation and anaesthesia times, and amount of intraoperative ventricular puncture attempts as well as complications, any morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: To date, there is no prospective data available comparing these two navigation techniques. A randomised controlled study is urgently needed in order to provide class I evidence for the best possible surgical technique of this frequent surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Business Administration System for Ethical Committees (BASEC) 2019-02157, registered on 21 November 2019, https://www.kofam.ch/de/studienportal/suche/88135/studie/49552; clinicalTrials.gov: NCT04450797, registered on 30 June 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8132376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81323762021-05-19 Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study Leu, Severina Halbeisen, Florian Mariani, Luigi Soleman, Jehuda Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures and the operation is performed in a highly standardised manner under maintenance of highest infection precautions. Short operation times are important since longer duration of surgery can increase the risk for VPS complications, especially infections. The position of the proximal ventricular catheter influences shunt functioning and survival. With freehand placement, rates of malpositioned VPS are still high. Several navigation techniques for improvement of shunt placement have been developed. Studies comparing these techniques are sparse. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare ultrasound (US) guided to stereotactic navigated shunt placement using optical tracking with the focus on operation time and efficiency. METHODS: In this prospective randomised, single-centre, partially-blinded study, we will include all patients undergoing VPS placement in our clinic. The patients will be randomised into two groups, one group undergoing US-guided (US-G) and the other group stereotactic navigated VPS placement using optical tracking. The primary outcome will be the surgical intervention time. This time span consists of the surgical preparation time together with the operation time and is given in minutes. Secondary outcomes will be accuracy of catheter positioning, VPS dysfunction and need for revision surgery, total operation and anaesthesia times, and amount of intraoperative ventricular puncture attempts as well as complications, any morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: To date, there is no prospective data available comparing these two navigation techniques. A randomised controlled study is urgently needed in order to provide class I evidence for the best possible surgical technique of this frequent surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Business Administration System for Ethical Committees (BASEC) 2019-02157, registered on 21 November 2019, https://www.kofam.ch/de/studienportal/suche/88135/studie/49552; clinicalTrials.gov: NCT04450797, registered on 30 June 2020. BioMed Central 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8132376/ /pubmed/34011396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Leu, Severina
Halbeisen, Florian
Mariani, Luigi
Soleman, Jehuda
Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_full Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_short Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_sort intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5
work_keys_str_mv AT leuseverina intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT halbeisenflorian intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT marianiluigi intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT solemanjehuda intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy