Cargando…
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients over 80. METHOD: GCA patients over 80 years old from the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis register who received TCZ were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one GCA patients (median age 84...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02529-4 |
_version_ | 1783694907568816128 |
---|---|
author | de Boysson, Hubert Le Besnerais, Maelle Blaison, Félix Daumas, Aurélie Jarrot, Pierre-André Perrin, François Tieulié, Nathalie Maria, Alexandre Duffau, Pierre Gombert, Bruno Samson, Maxime Espitia, Olivier Lambert, Marc Mékinian, Arsène Aouba, Achille |
author_facet | de Boysson, Hubert Le Besnerais, Maelle Blaison, Félix Daumas, Aurélie Jarrot, Pierre-André Perrin, François Tieulié, Nathalie Maria, Alexandre Duffau, Pierre Gombert, Bruno Samson, Maxime Espitia, Olivier Lambert, Marc Mékinian, Arsène Aouba, Achille |
author_sort | de Boysson, Hubert |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients over 80. METHOD: GCA patients over 80 years old from the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis register who received TCZ were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one GCA patients (median age 84 [81–90] years old, including nine over 85) received TCZ for the following nonexclusive reasons: glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effect in 14, relapsing disease in 8, disease severity in 4, and/or failure of another immunosuppressant in 4. TCZ was introduced with GCs at diagnosis in 6 patients and at 8 [3–37] months after GC initiation in 15 others. After a median delay of 8 [2–21] months post-TCZ introduction, 14 (67%) patients were able to definitively stop GCs, including 6 who were GC-dependent before TCZ. At the last follow-up (median 20 [3–48] months), 11 (52%) patients had definitively stopped TCZ, and 2 additional patients had stopped but relapsed and resumed TCZ. Seven (33%) patients experienced 11 adverse events: hypercholesterolemia in 4 patients; infections, i.e., pyelonephritis, bronchitis, and fatal septic shock associated with mesenteric infarction following planned surgery (GCs were stopped for 1 year and TCZ infusions for 2 months), respectively, in 3 patients; moderate thrombocytopenia and moderate neutropenia in 2 patients; and a 5-fold increase in transaminase levels in another that improved after TCZ dose reduction. CONCLUSION: TCZ remains a valuable GC-sparing option in the oldest GCA patients with an interesting risk-benefit ratio. Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed in one-third of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8132404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81324042021-05-19 Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis de Boysson, Hubert Le Besnerais, Maelle Blaison, Félix Daumas, Aurélie Jarrot, Pierre-André Perrin, François Tieulié, Nathalie Maria, Alexandre Duffau, Pierre Gombert, Bruno Samson, Maxime Espitia, Olivier Lambert, Marc Mékinian, Arsène Aouba, Achille Arthritis Res Ther Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients over 80. METHOD: GCA patients over 80 years old from the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis register who received TCZ were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one GCA patients (median age 84 [81–90] years old, including nine over 85) received TCZ for the following nonexclusive reasons: glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effect in 14, relapsing disease in 8, disease severity in 4, and/or failure of another immunosuppressant in 4. TCZ was introduced with GCs at diagnosis in 6 patients and at 8 [3–37] months after GC initiation in 15 others. After a median delay of 8 [2–21] months post-TCZ introduction, 14 (67%) patients were able to definitively stop GCs, including 6 who were GC-dependent before TCZ. At the last follow-up (median 20 [3–48] months), 11 (52%) patients had definitively stopped TCZ, and 2 additional patients had stopped but relapsed and resumed TCZ. Seven (33%) patients experienced 11 adverse events: hypercholesterolemia in 4 patients; infections, i.e., pyelonephritis, bronchitis, and fatal septic shock associated with mesenteric infarction following planned surgery (GCs were stopped for 1 year and TCZ infusions for 2 months), respectively, in 3 patients; moderate thrombocytopenia and moderate neutropenia in 2 patients; and a 5-fold increase in transaminase levels in another that improved after TCZ dose reduction. CONCLUSION: TCZ remains a valuable GC-sparing option in the oldest GCA patients with an interesting risk-benefit ratio. Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed in one-third of patients. BioMed Central 2021-05-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8132404/ /pubmed/34011407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02529-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Boysson, Hubert Le Besnerais, Maelle Blaison, Félix Daumas, Aurélie Jarrot, Pierre-André Perrin, François Tieulié, Nathalie Maria, Alexandre Duffau, Pierre Gombert, Bruno Samson, Maxime Espitia, Olivier Lambert, Marc Mékinian, Arsène Aouba, Achille Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
title | Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
title_full | Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
title_short | Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
title_sort | assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02529-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deboyssonhubert assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT lebesneraismaelle assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT blaisonfelix assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT daumasaurelie assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT jarrotpierreandre assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT perrinfrancois assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT tieulienathalie assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT mariaalexandre assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT duffaupierre assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT gombertbruno assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT samsonmaxime assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT espitiaolivier assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT lambertmarc assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT mekinianarsene assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT aoubaachille assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis AT assessmentoftheefficacyandsafetyoftocilizumabinpatientsover80yearsoldwithgiantcellarteritis |