Cargando…

Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?

INTRODUCTION: Effective diabetes pharmacotherapy often involves injectable medications, which if used inappropriately represents a type of unintentional medication nonadherence that leads to poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the percent of patients who accu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deas, Crystal M., Clark, Serena K., Freeman, Maisha Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017647
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i1.2320
_version_ 1783694934399778816
author Deas, Crystal M.
Clark, Serena K.
Freeman, Maisha Kelly
author_facet Deas, Crystal M.
Clark, Serena K.
Freeman, Maisha Kelly
author_sort Deas, Crystal M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Effective diabetes pharmacotherapy often involves injectable medications, which if used inappropriately represents a type of unintentional medication nonadherence that leads to poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the percent of patients who accurately prepared, administered, stored, and disposed of their injectable diabetes medication. Secondary objectives included comparing the accuracy of injectable use among those with diabetes <5 years vs. ≥ 5 years duration and those with limited vs. proficient health literacy. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis conducted on a convenience sample of patients who received a pilot pharmacist-led, quality improvement service at an urban, ambulatory care clinic. The service components included health literacy screening, using the Rapid Assessment of Adult Literacy in Medicine – Short Form (REALM-SF) tool, evaluation of injectable technique by use of a standardized questionnaire, and provision of medication education. Duration of diabetes was determined by patient self-report. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were utilized to assess accuracy of injectable technique in two group comparisons: (1) patients with limited vs. proficient health literacy and (2) patients with diabetes <5 years vs. ≥5 years. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the analysis. Despite the majority (71.4%) of patients reporting prior education on injectable use, 54.3% reported at least one error in product use. Significant findings noted were that those with limited health literacy had higher rates of accurately using the skin-fold technique and appropriate angle for injection vs. those with proficient health literacy (p<0.05 for both comparisons). Likewise, more patients in the cohort of diabetes duration ≥5 years accurately rotated the injection site vs. those with a duration <5 years (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Errors in injectable technique were common in this study and spanned across health literacy levels and duration of diabetes. Patients prescribed injectable diabetes medications should be routinely educated on proper technique for use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8132543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81325432021-05-19 Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes? Deas, Crystal M. Clark, Serena K. Freeman, Maisha Kelly Innov Pharm Original Research INTRODUCTION: Effective diabetes pharmacotherapy often involves injectable medications, which if used inappropriately represents a type of unintentional medication nonadherence that leads to poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the percent of patients who accurately prepared, administered, stored, and disposed of their injectable diabetes medication. Secondary objectives included comparing the accuracy of injectable use among those with diabetes <5 years vs. ≥ 5 years duration and those with limited vs. proficient health literacy. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis conducted on a convenience sample of patients who received a pilot pharmacist-led, quality improvement service at an urban, ambulatory care clinic. The service components included health literacy screening, using the Rapid Assessment of Adult Literacy in Medicine – Short Form (REALM-SF) tool, evaluation of injectable technique by use of a standardized questionnaire, and provision of medication education. Duration of diabetes was determined by patient self-report. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were utilized to assess accuracy of injectable technique in two group comparisons: (1) patients with limited vs. proficient health literacy and (2) patients with diabetes <5 years vs. ≥5 years. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the analysis. Despite the majority (71.4%) of patients reporting prior education on injectable use, 54.3% reported at least one error in product use. Significant findings noted were that those with limited health literacy had higher rates of accurately using the skin-fold technique and appropriate angle for injection vs. those with proficient health literacy (p<0.05 for both comparisons). Likewise, more patients in the cohort of diabetes duration ≥5 years accurately rotated the injection site vs. those with a duration <5 years (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Errors in injectable technique were common in this study and spanned across health literacy levels and duration of diabetes. Patients prescribed injectable diabetes medications should be routinely educated on proper technique for use. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8132543/ /pubmed/34017647 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i1.2320 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Deas, Crystal M.
Clark, Serena K.
Freeman, Maisha Kelly
Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?
title Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?
title_full Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?
title_fullStr Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?
title_short Evaluation of Antidiabetic Injectable Technique: Is There an Association between Accuracy and Health Literacy or Duration of Diabetes?
title_sort evaluation of antidiabetic injectable technique: is there an association between accuracy and health literacy or duration of diabetes?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34017647
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i1.2320
work_keys_str_mv AT deascrystalm evaluationofantidiabeticinjectabletechniqueisthereanassociationbetweenaccuracyandhealthliteracyordurationofdiabetes
AT clarkserenak evaluationofantidiabeticinjectabletechniqueisthereanassociationbetweenaccuracyandhealthliteracyordurationofdiabetes
AT freemanmaishakelly evaluationofantidiabeticinjectabletechniqueisthereanassociationbetweenaccuracyandhealthliteracyordurationofdiabetes