Cargando…
The Mental Health Trigger Tool: Development and Testing of a Specialized Trigger Tool for Mental Health Settings
OBJECTIVE: Tools generally used in measuring patient safety incidents in general healthcare settings are not considered suitable for mental health settings. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a specialized trigger tool for mental health settings that could detect both traditionally de...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31009409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000606 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: Tools generally used in measuring patient safety incidents in general healthcare settings are not considered suitable for mental health settings. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a specialized trigger tool for mental health settings that could detect both traditionally defined adverse events (AEs) and other mental health–related patient safety incidents (MHPSIs). METHODS: We first defined and categorized AEs and MHPSIs based on existing literature and then developed a trigger list, initially consisting of 50 items, which was subsequently reduced to 25 items after a pilot study. We then explored the properties of this final 25-item trigger tool, the Mental Health Trigger Tool (MHTT), through a retrospective review of 515 patient records with a two-stage review process similar to Global Trigger Tool methodology. We used findings of an alternative method of review which consisted of page-to-page reviews of patient records in the analysis of properties of MHTT. RESULTS: Using the MHTT, at least one AE was identified in 98 patient records (19%) and at least one MHPSI was identified in 58 patient records (11%). The MHTT had a sensitivity of 98.6% and its specificity was 100%. The probability of finding an AE/MHPSI when any trigger was detected in a patient record with MHTT was 33.8% and that of individual triggers ranged from 0% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The MHTT may offer an effective, practical, and easy-to-use method in identifying and measuring safety incidents in mental health settings. |
---|