Cargando…

The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND: : Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women all over the world and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality. Imaging examination plays an important role in the diagnosis of early breast cancer. Due to different imaging principles and methods, all kinds of exam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Mei, Lian, Rongna, Zhang, Ruinian, Hong, Yulong, Feng, Wen, Feng, Shifang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34106617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025803
_version_ 1783695013402640384
author Zhang, Mei
Lian, Rongna
Zhang, Ruinian
Hong, Yulong
Feng, Wen
Feng, Shifang
author_facet Zhang, Mei
Lian, Rongna
Zhang, Ruinian
Hong, Yulong
Feng, Wen
Feng, Shifang
author_sort Zhang, Mei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: : Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women all over the world and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality. Imaging examination plays an important role in the diagnosis of early breast cancer. Due to different imaging principles and methods, all kinds of examinations have their advantages and disadvantages. It is particularly important for clinicians to choose these examination methods reasonably to achieve the best diagnostic effect. The objectives of this systematic review and NMA are to determine the diagnostic accuracy of imaging technologies for breast cancer and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different index tests and to support guidelines development and clinical practice. METHODS: : PubMed, Embase.com, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and SinoMed will be searched to identify relevant studies up to August 31, 2021. We will include random controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies that evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging diagnostic methods for breast cancer. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 quality assessment tool will be used to assess the risk of bias in each study. Standard pairwise meta-analysis and NMA will be performed using STATA V.12.0, MetaDiSc 1.40, and R 3.4.1 software to compare the diagnostic efficacy of different imaging diagnostic methods. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: : The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: : This study will comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of different imaging diagnostic methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence to support clinical practice and guidelines development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8133071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81330712021-05-24 The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy Zhang, Mei Lian, Rongna Zhang, Ruinian Hong, Yulong Feng, Wen Feng, Shifang Medicine (Baltimore) 5750 BACKGROUND: : Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women all over the world and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality. Imaging examination plays an important role in the diagnosis of early breast cancer. Due to different imaging principles and methods, all kinds of examinations have their advantages and disadvantages. It is particularly important for clinicians to choose these examination methods reasonably to achieve the best diagnostic effect. The objectives of this systematic review and NMA are to determine the diagnostic accuracy of imaging technologies for breast cancer and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different index tests and to support guidelines development and clinical practice. METHODS: : PubMed, Embase.com, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and SinoMed will be searched to identify relevant studies up to August 31, 2021. We will include random controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies that evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging diagnostic methods for breast cancer. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 quality assessment tool will be used to assess the risk of bias in each study. Standard pairwise meta-analysis and NMA will be performed using STATA V.12.0, MetaDiSc 1.40, and R 3.4.1 software to compare the diagnostic efficacy of different imaging diagnostic methods. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: : The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: : This study will comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of different imaging diagnostic methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer. The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence to support clinical practice and guidelines development. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8133071/ /pubmed/34106617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025803 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5750
Zhang, Mei
Lian, Rongna
Zhang, Ruinian
Hong, Yulong
Feng, Wen
Feng, Shifang
The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_short The value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort value of different imaging methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a protocol for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
topic 5750
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34106617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025803
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmei thevalueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT lianrongna thevalueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zhangruinian thevalueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT hongyulong thevalueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT fengwen thevalueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT fengshifang thevalueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zhangmei valueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT lianrongna valueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zhangruinian valueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT hongyulong valueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT fengwen valueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT fengshifang valueofdifferentimagingmethodsinthediagnosisofbreastcanceraprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy