Cargando…
Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree
Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Early prediction of sepsis can reduce the overall mortality rate and cost of sepsis treatment. Some studies have predicted mortality and development of sepsis using machine learning models. However, there is a gap between the creatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34106618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025813 |
_version_ | 1783695019806294016 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ke Shi, Qinwen Liu, Siru Xie, Yilin Liu, Jialin |
author_facet | Li, Ke Shi, Qinwen Liu, Siru Xie, Yilin Liu, Jialin |
author_sort | Li, Ke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Early prediction of sepsis can reduce the overall mortality rate and cost of sepsis treatment. Some studies have predicted mortality and development of sepsis using machine learning models. However, there is a gap between the creation of different machine learning algorithms and their implementation in clinical practice. This study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III. We established and compared the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). A total of 3937 sepsis patients were included, with 34.3% mortality in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III group. In our comparison of 5 machine learning models (GBDT, LR, KNN, RF, and SVM), the GBDT model showed the best performance with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.992), recall (94.8%), accuracy (95.4%), and F1 score (0.933). The RF, SVM, and KNN models showed better performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.980, 0.898, and 0.877, respectively) than the LR (0.876). The GBDT model showed better performance than other machine learning models (LR, KNN, RF, and SVM) in predicting the mortality of patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit. This could be used to develop a clinical decision support system in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8133100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81331002021-05-24 Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree Li, Ke Shi, Qinwen Liu, Siru Xie, Yilin Liu, Jialin Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality in the intensive care unit. Early prediction of sepsis can reduce the overall mortality rate and cost of sepsis treatment. Some studies have predicted mortality and development of sepsis using machine learning models. However, there is a gap between the creation of different machine learning algorithms and their implementation in clinical practice. This study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III. We established and compared the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). A total of 3937 sepsis patients were included, with 34.3% mortality in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III group. In our comparison of 5 machine learning models (GBDT, LR, KNN, RF, and SVM), the GBDT model showed the best performance with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.992), recall (94.8%), accuracy (95.4%), and F1 score (0.933). The RF, SVM, and KNN models showed better performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.980, 0.898, and 0.877, respectively) than the LR (0.876). The GBDT model showed better performance than other machine learning models (LR, KNN, RF, and SVM) in predicting the mortality of patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit. This could be used to develop a clinical decision support system in the future. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8133100/ /pubmed/34106618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025813 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4900 Li, Ke Shi, Qinwen Liu, Siru Xie, Yilin Liu, Jialin Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
title | Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
title_full | Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
title_fullStr | Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
title_short | Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
title_sort | predicting in-hospital mortality in icu patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34106618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT like predictinginhospitalmortalityinicupatientswithsepsisusinggradientboostingdecisiontree AT shiqinwen predictinginhospitalmortalityinicupatientswithsepsisusinggradientboostingdecisiontree AT liusiru predictinginhospitalmortalityinicupatientswithsepsisusinggradientboostingdecisiontree AT xieyilin predictinginhospitalmortalityinicupatientswithsepsisusinggradientboostingdecisiontree AT liujialin predictinginhospitalmortalityinicupatientswithsepsisusinggradientboostingdecisiontree |