Cargando…
Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
OBJECTIVES: Treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome is complex. Evidence-based therapies that can improve survival and guidelines advocating their use exist; however, implementation is inconsistent. Our objective was to develop and validate an evidence-base...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000428 |
_version_ | 1783695025116282880 |
---|---|
author | Parhar, Ken Kuljit S. Zjadewicz, Karolina Knight, Gwen E. Soo, Andrea Boyd, Jamie M. Zuege, Danny J. Niven, Daniel J. Doig, Christopher J. Stelfox, Henry T. |
author_facet | Parhar, Ken Kuljit S. Zjadewicz, Karolina Knight, Gwen E. Soo, Andrea Boyd, Jamie M. Zuege, Danny J. Niven, Daniel J. Doig, Christopher J. Stelfox, Henry T. |
author_sort | Parhar, Ken Kuljit S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome is complex. Evidence-based therapies that can improve survival and guidelines advocating their use exist; however, implementation is inconsistent. Our objective was to develop and validate an evidence-based, stakeholder-informed standardized management pathway for hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome to improve adherence to best practice. DESIGN: A standardized management pathway was developed using a modified Delphi consensus process with a multidisciplinary group of ICU clinicians. The proposed pathway was externally validated with a survey involving multidisciplinary stakeholders and clinicians. SETTING: In-person meeting and web-based surveys of ICU clinicians from 17 adult ICUs in the province of Alberta, Canada. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The consensus panel was comprised of 30 ICU clinicians (4 nurses, 10 respiratory therapists, 15 intensivists, 1 nurse practitioner; median years of practice 17 [interquartile range, 13–21]). Ninety-one components were serially rated and revised over two rounds of online and one in-person review. The final pathway included 46 elements. For the validation survey, 692 responses (including 59% nurses, 33% respiratory therapists, 7% intensivists and 1% nurse practitioners) were received. Agreement of greater than 75% was achieved on 43 of 46 pathway elements. CONCLUSIONS: A 46-element evidence-informed hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome standardized management pathway was developed and demonstrated to have content validity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8133138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81331382021-05-24 Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Parhar, Ken Kuljit S. Zjadewicz, Karolina Knight, Gwen E. Soo, Andrea Boyd, Jamie M. Zuege, Danny J. Niven, Daniel J. Doig, Christopher J. Stelfox, Henry T. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report OBJECTIVES: Treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome is complex. Evidence-based therapies that can improve survival and guidelines advocating their use exist; however, implementation is inconsistent. Our objective was to develop and validate an evidence-based, stakeholder-informed standardized management pathway for hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome to improve adherence to best practice. DESIGN: A standardized management pathway was developed using a modified Delphi consensus process with a multidisciplinary group of ICU clinicians. The proposed pathway was externally validated with a survey involving multidisciplinary stakeholders and clinicians. SETTING: In-person meeting and web-based surveys of ICU clinicians from 17 adult ICUs in the province of Alberta, Canada. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The consensus panel was comprised of 30 ICU clinicians (4 nurses, 10 respiratory therapists, 15 intensivists, 1 nurse practitioner; median years of practice 17 [interquartile range, 13–21]). Ninety-one components were serially rated and revised over two rounds of online and one in-person review. The final pathway included 46 elements. For the validation survey, 692 responses (including 59% nurses, 33% respiratory therapists, 7% intensivists and 1% nurse practitioners) were received. Agreement of greater than 75% was achieved on 43 of 46 pathway elements. CONCLUSIONS: A 46-element evidence-informed hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome standardized management pathway was developed and demonstrated to have content validity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8133138/ /pubmed/34036279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000428 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Clinical Report Parhar, Ken Kuljit S. Zjadewicz, Karolina Knight, Gwen E. Soo, Andrea Boyd, Jamie M. Zuege, Danny J. Niven, Daniel J. Doig, Christopher J. Stelfox, Henry T. Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title | Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_full | Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_fullStr | Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_short | Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
title_sort | development and content validation of a multidisciplinary standardized management pathway for hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome |
topic | Original Clinical Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parharkenkuljits developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zjadewiczkarolina developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT knightgwene developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT sooandrea developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT boydjamiem developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zuegedannyj developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT nivendanielj developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT doigchristopherj developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT stelfoxhenryt developmentandcontentvalidationofamultidisciplinarystandardizedmanagementpathwayforhypoxemicrespiratoryfailureandacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome |