Cargando…

The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial

There is still controversy about whether clinicians should include cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification into the consideration for treatment of hypertension. This was a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). A total of 9361 nondiabetic patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alborzi, Alireza, Attar, Armin, Sayadi, Mehrab, Nouri, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6635345
_version_ 1783695135504072704
author Alborzi, Alireza
Attar, Armin
Sayadi, Mehrab
Nouri, Fatemeh
author_facet Alborzi, Alireza
Attar, Armin
Sayadi, Mehrab
Nouri, Fatemeh
author_sort Alborzi, Alireza
collection PubMed
description There is still controversy about whether clinicians should include cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification into the consideration for treatment of hypertension. This was a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). A total of 9361 nondiabetic patients without a history of stroke were randomly assigned to the intensive-treatment group (with an SBP target of <120 mm Hg) and the standard-treatment group (with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg). The patients were categorized into four groups based on the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score. The groups contained participants with ASCVD < 7.5%, 7.5% ≤ ASCVD <10%, 10% ≤ ASCVD < 15%, and ASCVD ≥ 15%. The incidence of the primary outcome, secondary outcome, and serious adverse events was compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure (HF), or death from cardiovascular causes. The secondary outcomes consisted of the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause death. Intensive blood pressure (BP) control significantly reduced the incidence of primary outcome event in patients with 10% ≤ ASCVD < 15% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.593; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.361–0.975; P = 0.039) and ASCVD ≥ 15% (HR 0.778; CI 0.644–0.940; P = 0.009). Intensive BP control was also beneficial for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with an ASCVD risk of 7.5–10% (HR 0.187; 95% CI 0.040–0.862; P = 0.032). However, intensive treatment was associated with higher incidence of hypotension and acute renal failure in participants with ASCVD ≥ 15%. In patients without diabetes mellitus and prior stroke who had a 10-year risk of cardiovascular events above 10% based on the ASCVD risk score, intensive BP control played an important role in the reduction of major cardiovascular events. Additionally, intensive treatment would be beneficial for primary prevention in patients with ASCVD ≥ 7.5% without previous history of any cardiovascular disorders. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number; the trial is registered with NCT01206062.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8133861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81338612021-05-27 The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial Alborzi, Alireza Attar, Armin Sayadi, Mehrab Nouri, Fatemeh Cardiol Res Pract Research Article There is still controversy about whether clinicians should include cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification into the consideration for treatment of hypertension. This was a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). A total of 9361 nondiabetic patients without a history of stroke were randomly assigned to the intensive-treatment group (with an SBP target of <120 mm Hg) and the standard-treatment group (with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg). The patients were categorized into four groups based on the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score. The groups contained participants with ASCVD < 7.5%, 7.5% ≤ ASCVD <10%, 10% ≤ ASCVD < 15%, and ASCVD ≥ 15%. The incidence of the primary outcome, secondary outcome, and serious adverse events was compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure (HF), or death from cardiovascular causes. The secondary outcomes consisted of the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause death. Intensive blood pressure (BP) control significantly reduced the incidence of primary outcome event in patients with 10% ≤ ASCVD < 15% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.593; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.361–0.975; P = 0.039) and ASCVD ≥ 15% (HR 0.778; CI 0.644–0.940; P = 0.009). Intensive BP control was also beneficial for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with an ASCVD risk of 7.5–10% (HR 0.187; 95% CI 0.040–0.862; P = 0.032). However, intensive treatment was associated with higher incidence of hypotension and acute renal failure in participants with ASCVD ≥ 15%. In patients without diabetes mellitus and prior stroke who had a 10-year risk of cardiovascular events above 10% based on the ASCVD risk score, intensive BP control played an important role in the reduction of major cardiovascular events. Additionally, intensive treatment would be beneficial for primary prevention in patients with ASCVD ≥ 7.5% without previous history of any cardiovascular disorders. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number; the trial is registered with NCT01206062. Hindawi 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8133861/ /pubmed/34055403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6635345 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alireza Alborzi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alborzi, Alireza
Attar, Armin
Sayadi, Mehrab
Nouri, Fatemeh
The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial
title The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial
title_full The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial
title_fullStr The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial
title_short The Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes Based on 10-Year ASCVD Risk Score: An Analysis of a Clinical Trial
title_sort effects of intensive blood pressure control on cardiovascular outcomes based on 10-year ascvd risk score: an analysis of a clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8133861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6635345
work_keys_str_mv AT alborzialireza theeffectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT attararmin theeffectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT sayadimehrab theeffectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT nourifatemeh theeffectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT alborzialireza effectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT attararmin effectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT sayadimehrab effectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial
AT nourifatemeh effectsofintensivebloodpressurecontroloncardiovascularoutcomesbasedon10yearascvdriskscoreananalysisofaclinicaltrial