Cargando…

Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning

PURPOSE : Electrode bending observed after stereotactic interventions is typically not accounted for in either computer-assisted planning algorithms, where straight trajectories are assumed, or in quality assessment, where only metrics related to entry and target points are reported. Our aim is to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granados, Alejandro, Han, Yuxuan, Lucena, Oeslle, Vakharia, Vejay, Rodionov, Roman, Vos, Sjoerd B., Miserocchi, Anna, McEvoy, Andrew W., Duncan, John S., Sparks, Rachel, Ourselin, Sébastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02347-8
_version_ 1783695168334987264
author Granados, Alejandro
Han, Yuxuan
Lucena, Oeslle
Vakharia, Vejay
Rodionov, Roman
Vos, Sjoerd B.
Miserocchi, Anna
McEvoy, Andrew W.
Duncan, John S.
Sparks, Rachel
Ourselin, Sébastien
author_facet Granados, Alejandro
Han, Yuxuan
Lucena, Oeslle
Vakharia, Vejay
Rodionov, Roman
Vos, Sjoerd B.
Miserocchi, Anna
McEvoy, Andrew W.
Duncan, John S.
Sparks, Rachel
Ourselin, Sébastien
author_sort Granados, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE : Electrode bending observed after stereotactic interventions is typically not accounted for in either computer-assisted planning algorithms, where straight trajectories are assumed, or in quality assessment, where only metrics related to entry and target points are reported. Our aim is to provide a fully automated and validated pipeline for the prediction of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) electrode bending. METHODS : We transform electrodes of 86 cases into a common space and compare features-based and image-based neural networks on their ability to regress local displacement ([Formula: see text] ) or electrode bending ([Formula: see text] ). Electrodes were stratified into six groups based on brain structures at the entry and target point. Models, both with and without Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, were trained and validated using tenfold cross-validation. RESULTS : mage-based models outperformed features-based models for all groups, and models that predicted [Formula: see text] performed better than for [Formula: see text] . Image-based model prediction with MC dropout resulted in lower mean squared error (MSE) with improvements up to 12.9% ([Formula: see text] ) and 39.9% ([Formula: see text] ), compared to no dropout. Using an image of brain tissue types (cortex, white and deep grey matter) resulted in similar, and sometimes better performance, compared to using a T1-weighted MRI when predicting [Formula: see text] . When inferring trajectories of image-based models (brain tissue types), 86.9% of trajectories had an MSE[Formula: see text]  mm. CONCLUSION : An image-based approach regressing local displacement with an image of brain tissue types resulted in more accurate electrode bending predictions compared to other approaches, inputs, and outputs. Future work will investigate the integration of electrode bending into planning and quality assessment algorithms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02347-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8134306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81343062021-05-24 Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning Granados, Alejandro Han, Yuxuan Lucena, Oeslle Vakharia, Vejay Rodionov, Roman Vos, Sjoerd B. Miserocchi, Anna McEvoy, Andrew W. Duncan, John S. Sparks, Rachel Ourselin, Sébastien Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE : Electrode bending observed after stereotactic interventions is typically not accounted for in either computer-assisted planning algorithms, where straight trajectories are assumed, or in quality assessment, where only metrics related to entry and target points are reported. Our aim is to provide a fully automated and validated pipeline for the prediction of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) electrode bending. METHODS : We transform electrodes of 86 cases into a common space and compare features-based and image-based neural networks on their ability to regress local displacement ([Formula: see text] ) or electrode bending ([Formula: see text] ). Electrodes were stratified into six groups based on brain structures at the entry and target point. Models, both with and without Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, were trained and validated using tenfold cross-validation. RESULTS : mage-based models outperformed features-based models for all groups, and models that predicted [Formula: see text] performed better than for [Formula: see text] . Image-based model prediction with MC dropout resulted in lower mean squared error (MSE) with improvements up to 12.9% ([Formula: see text] ) and 39.9% ([Formula: see text] ), compared to no dropout. Using an image of brain tissue types (cortex, white and deep grey matter) resulted in similar, and sometimes better performance, compared to using a T1-weighted MRI when predicting [Formula: see text] . When inferring trajectories of image-based models (brain tissue types), 86.9% of trajectories had an MSE[Formula: see text]  mm. CONCLUSION : An image-based approach regressing local displacement with an image of brain tissue types resulted in more accurate electrode bending predictions compared to other approaches, inputs, and outputs. Future work will investigate the integration of electrode bending into planning and quality assessment algorithms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02347-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8134306/ /pubmed/33761063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02347-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Granados, Alejandro
Han, Yuxuan
Lucena, Oeslle
Vakharia, Vejay
Rodionov, Roman
Vos, Sjoerd B.
Miserocchi, Anna
McEvoy, Andrew W.
Duncan, John S.
Sparks, Rachel
Ourselin, Sébastien
Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
title Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
title_full Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
title_fullStr Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
title_full_unstemmed Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
title_short Patient-specific prediction of SEEG electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
title_sort patient-specific prediction of seeg electrode bending for stereotactic neurosurgical planning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02347-8
work_keys_str_mv AT granadosalejandro patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT hanyuxuan patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT lucenaoeslle patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT vakhariavejay patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT rodionovroman patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT vossjoerdb patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT miserocchianna patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT mcevoyandreww patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT duncanjohns patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT sparksrachel patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning
AT ourselinsebastien patientspecificpredictionofseegelectrodebendingforstereotacticneurosurgicalplanning