Cargando…
A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison
BACKGROUND: Colorectal multidisciplinary teams (CR MDTs) were introduced to enhance the cancer care pathway and allow for early investigation and treatment of cancer. However, there are no ‘gold standards’ set for this process. The aim of this study was to review the literature systematically and pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab044 |
_version_ | 1783695193321504768 |
---|---|
author | Fehervari, M Hamrang-Yousefi, S Fadel, M G Mills, S C Warren, O J Tekkis, P P Kontovounisios, C |
author_facet | Fehervari, M Hamrang-Yousefi, S Fadel, M G Mills, S C Warren, O J Tekkis, P P Kontovounisios, C |
author_sort | Fehervari, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal multidisciplinary teams (CR MDTs) were introduced to enhance the cancer care pathway and allow for early investigation and treatment of cancer. However, there are no ‘gold standards’ set for this process. The aim of this study was to review the literature systematically and provide a qualitative analysis on the principles, organization, structure and output of CR MDTs internationally. METHODS: Literature on the role of CR MDTs published between January 1999 and March 2020 in the UK, USA and continental Europe was evaluated. Historical background, structure, core members, education, frequency, patient-selection criteria, quality assurance, clinical output and outcomes were extracted from data from the UK, USA and continental Europe. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were identified that specifically met the inclusion criteria. The majority of hospitals held CR MDTs at least fortnightly in the UK and Europe by 2002 and 2005 respectively. In the USA, monthly MDTs became a mandatory element of cancer programmes by 2013. In the UK, USA and in several European countries, the lead of the MDT meeting is a surgeon and core members include the oncologist, specialist nurse, histopathologist, radiologist and gastroenterologist. There were differences observed in patient-selection criteria, in the use of information technology, MDT databases and quality assurance internationally. CONCLUSION: CR MDTs are essential in improving the patient care pathway and should express clear recommendations for each patient. However, a form of quality assurance should be implemented across all MDTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8134530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81345302021-05-25 A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison Fehervari, M Hamrang-Yousefi, S Fadel, M G Mills, S C Warren, O J Tekkis, P P Kontovounisios, C BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Colorectal multidisciplinary teams (CR MDTs) were introduced to enhance the cancer care pathway and allow for early investigation and treatment of cancer. However, there are no ‘gold standards’ set for this process. The aim of this study was to review the literature systematically and provide a qualitative analysis on the principles, organization, structure and output of CR MDTs internationally. METHODS: Literature on the role of CR MDTs published between January 1999 and March 2020 in the UK, USA and continental Europe was evaluated. Historical background, structure, core members, education, frequency, patient-selection criteria, quality assurance, clinical output and outcomes were extracted from data from the UK, USA and continental Europe. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were identified that specifically met the inclusion criteria. The majority of hospitals held CR MDTs at least fortnightly in the UK and Europe by 2002 and 2005 respectively. In the USA, monthly MDTs became a mandatory element of cancer programmes by 2013. In the UK, USA and in several European countries, the lead of the MDT meeting is a surgeon and core members include the oncologist, specialist nurse, histopathologist, radiologist and gastroenterologist. There were differences observed in patient-selection criteria, in the use of information technology, MDT databases and quality assurance internationally. CONCLUSION: CR MDTs are essential in improving the patient care pathway and should express clear recommendations for each patient. However, a form of quality assurance should be implemented across all MDTs. Oxford University Press 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8134530/ /pubmed/34013317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab044 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Fehervari, M Hamrang-Yousefi, S Fadel, M G Mills, S C Warren, O J Tekkis, P P Kontovounisios, C A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
title | A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
title_full | A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
title_short | A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
title_sort | systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fehervarim asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT hamrangyousefis asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT fadelmg asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT millssc asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT warrenoj asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT tekkispp asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT kontovounisiosc asystematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT fehervarim systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT hamrangyousefis systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT fadelmg systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT millssc systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT warrenoj systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT tekkispp systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison AT kontovounisiosc systematicreviewofcolorectalmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsaninternationalcomparison |