Cargando…

Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices

Mandibular fracture fixation and reconstruction are usually performed using titanium plates and screws, however, there is a need to improve current fixation techniques. Animal models represent an important step for the testing of new designs and materials. However, the validity of those preclinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orassi, Vincenzo, Duda, Georg N., Heiland, Max, Fischer, Heilwig, Rendenbach, Carsten, Checa, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672176
_version_ 1783695215865888768
author Orassi, Vincenzo
Duda, Georg N.
Heiland, Max
Fischer, Heilwig
Rendenbach, Carsten
Checa, Sara
author_facet Orassi, Vincenzo
Duda, Georg N.
Heiland, Max
Fischer, Heilwig
Rendenbach, Carsten
Checa, Sara
author_sort Orassi, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description Mandibular fracture fixation and reconstruction are usually performed using titanium plates and screws, however, there is a need to improve current fixation techniques. Animal models represent an important step for the testing of new designs and materials. However, the validity of those preclinical models in terms of implant biomechanics remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigate the biomechanics of the sheep mandible as a preclinical model for testing the mechanical strength of fixation devices and the biomechanical environment induced on mandibular fractures. We aimed to assess the comparability of the biomechanical conditions in the sheep mandible as a preclinical model for human applications of fracture fixation devices and empower analyses of the effect of such defined mechanical conditions on bone healing outcome. We developed 3D finite element models of the human and sheep mandibles simulating physiological muscular loads and three different clenching tasks (intercuspal, incisal, and unilateral). Furthermore, we simulated fractures in the human mandibular body, sheep mandibular body, and sheep mandibular diastema fixated with clinically used titanium miniplates and screws. We compared, at the power stroke of mastication, the biomechanical environment (1) in the healthy mandibular body and (2) at the fracture sites, and (3) the mechanical solicitation of the implants as well as the mechanical conditions for bone healing in such cases. In the healthy mandibles, the sheep mandibular body showed lower mechanical strains compared to the human mandibular body. In the fractured mandibles, strains within a fracture gap in sheep were generally not comparable to humans, while similar or lower mechanical solicitation of the fixation devices was found between the human mandibular body fracture and the sheep mandibular diastema fracture scenarios. We, therefore, conclude that the mechanical environments of mandibular fractures in humans and sheep differ and our analyses suggest that the sheep mandibular bone should be carefully re-considered as a model system to study the effect of fixation devices on the healing outcome. In our analyses, the sheep mandibular diastema showed similar mechanical conditions for fracture fixation devices to those in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8134672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81346722021-05-21 Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices Orassi, Vincenzo Duda, Georg N. Heiland, Max Fischer, Heilwig Rendenbach, Carsten Checa, Sara Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Mandibular fracture fixation and reconstruction are usually performed using titanium plates and screws, however, there is a need to improve current fixation techniques. Animal models represent an important step for the testing of new designs and materials. However, the validity of those preclinical models in terms of implant biomechanics remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigate the biomechanics of the sheep mandible as a preclinical model for testing the mechanical strength of fixation devices and the biomechanical environment induced on mandibular fractures. We aimed to assess the comparability of the biomechanical conditions in the sheep mandible as a preclinical model for human applications of fracture fixation devices and empower analyses of the effect of such defined mechanical conditions on bone healing outcome. We developed 3D finite element models of the human and sheep mandibles simulating physiological muscular loads and three different clenching tasks (intercuspal, incisal, and unilateral). Furthermore, we simulated fractures in the human mandibular body, sheep mandibular body, and sheep mandibular diastema fixated with clinically used titanium miniplates and screws. We compared, at the power stroke of mastication, the biomechanical environment (1) in the healthy mandibular body and (2) at the fracture sites, and (3) the mechanical solicitation of the implants as well as the mechanical conditions for bone healing in such cases. In the healthy mandibles, the sheep mandibular body showed lower mechanical strains compared to the human mandibular body. In the fractured mandibles, strains within a fracture gap in sheep were generally not comparable to humans, while similar or lower mechanical solicitation of the fixation devices was found between the human mandibular body fracture and the sheep mandibular diastema fracture scenarios. We, therefore, conclude that the mechanical environments of mandibular fractures in humans and sheep differ and our analyses suggest that the sheep mandibular bone should be carefully re-considered as a model system to study the effect of fixation devices on the healing outcome. In our analyses, the sheep mandibular diastema showed similar mechanical conditions for fracture fixation devices to those in humans. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8134672/ /pubmed/34026745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672176 Text en Copyright © 2021 Orassi, Duda, Heiland, Fischer, Rendenbach and Checa. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Orassi, Vincenzo
Duda, Georg N.
Heiland, Max
Fischer, Heilwig
Rendenbach, Carsten
Checa, Sara
Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices
title Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices
title_full Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices
title_fullStr Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices
title_short Biomechanical Assessment of the Validity of Sheep as a Preclinical Model for Testing Mandibular Fracture Fixation Devices
title_sort biomechanical assessment of the validity of sheep as a preclinical model for testing mandibular fracture fixation devices
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34026745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672176
work_keys_str_mv AT orassivincenzo biomechanicalassessmentofthevalidityofsheepasapreclinicalmodelfortestingmandibularfracturefixationdevices
AT dudageorgn biomechanicalassessmentofthevalidityofsheepasapreclinicalmodelfortestingmandibularfracturefixationdevices
AT heilandmax biomechanicalassessmentofthevalidityofsheepasapreclinicalmodelfortestingmandibularfracturefixationdevices
AT fischerheilwig biomechanicalassessmentofthevalidityofsheepasapreclinicalmodelfortestingmandibularfracturefixationdevices
AT rendenbachcarsten biomechanicalassessmentofthevalidityofsheepasapreclinicalmodelfortestingmandibularfracturefixationdevices
AT checasara biomechanicalassessmentofthevalidityofsheepasapreclinicalmodelfortestingmandibularfracturefixationdevices