Cargando…

The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

BACKGROUND: The surge of critically ill patients due to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) overwhelmed critical care capacity in areas of northern Italy. Anesthesia machines have been used as alternatives to traditional ICU mechanical ventilators. However, the outcomes for patients with COVID-1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bottiroli, Maurizio, Calini, Angelo, Pinciroli, Riccardo, Mueller, Ariel, Siragusa, Antonio, Anelli, Carlo, Urman, Richard D., Nozari, Ala, Berra, Lorenzo, Mondino, Michele, Fumagalli, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01376-9
_version_ 1783695242513350656
author Bottiroli, Maurizio
Calini, Angelo
Pinciroli, Riccardo
Mueller, Ariel
Siragusa, Antonio
Anelli, Carlo
Urman, Richard D.
Nozari, Ala
Berra, Lorenzo
Mondino, Michele
Fumagalli, Roberto
author_facet Bottiroli, Maurizio
Calini, Angelo
Pinciroli, Riccardo
Mueller, Ariel
Siragusa, Antonio
Anelli, Carlo
Urman, Richard D.
Nozari, Ala
Berra, Lorenzo
Mondino, Michele
Fumagalli, Roberto
author_sort Bottiroli, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The surge of critically ill patients due to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) overwhelmed critical care capacity in areas of northern Italy. Anesthesia machines have been used as alternatives to traditional ICU mechanical ventilators. However, the outcomes for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure cared for with Anesthesia Machines is currently unknow. We hypothesized that COVID-19 patients receiving care with Anesthesia Machines would have worse outcomes compared to standard practice. METHODS: We designed a retrospective study of patients admitted with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis at a large tertiary urban hospital in northern Italy. Two care units were included: a 27-bed standard ICU and a 15-bed temporary unit emergently opened in an operating room setting. Intubated patients assigned to Anesthesia Machines (AM group) were compared to a control cohort treated with standard mechanical ventilators (ICU-VENT group). Outcomes were assessed at 60-day follow-up. A multivariable Cox regression analysis of risk factors between survivors and non-survivors was conducted to determine the adjusted risk of death for patients assigned to AM group. RESULTS: Complete daily data from 89 mechanically ventilated patients consecutively admitted to the two units were analyzed. Seventeen patients were included in the AM group, whereas 72 were in the ICU-VENT group. Disease severity and intensity of treatment were comparable between the two groups. The 60-day mortality was significantly higher in the AM group compared to the ICU-vent group (12/17 vs. 27/72, 70.6% vs. 37.5%, respectively, p = 0.016). Allocation to AM group was associated with a significantly increased risk of death after adjusting for covariates (HR 4.05, 95% CI: 1.75–9.33, p = 0.001). Several incidents and complications were reported with Anesthesia Machine care, raising safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that care associated with the use of Anesthesia Machines is inadequate to provide long-term critical care to patients with COVID-19. Added safety risks must be considered if no other option is available to treat severely ill patients during the ongoing pandemic. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01376-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8134805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81348052021-05-20 The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bottiroli, Maurizio Calini, Angelo Pinciroli, Riccardo Mueller, Ariel Siragusa, Antonio Anelli, Carlo Urman, Richard D. Nozari, Ala Berra, Lorenzo Mondino, Michele Fumagalli, Roberto BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The surge of critically ill patients due to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) overwhelmed critical care capacity in areas of northern Italy. Anesthesia machines have been used as alternatives to traditional ICU mechanical ventilators. However, the outcomes for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure cared for with Anesthesia Machines is currently unknow. We hypothesized that COVID-19 patients receiving care with Anesthesia Machines would have worse outcomes compared to standard practice. METHODS: We designed a retrospective study of patients admitted with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis at a large tertiary urban hospital in northern Italy. Two care units were included: a 27-bed standard ICU and a 15-bed temporary unit emergently opened in an operating room setting. Intubated patients assigned to Anesthesia Machines (AM group) were compared to a control cohort treated with standard mechanical ventilators (ICU-VENT group). Outcomes were assessed at 60-day follow-up. A multivariable Cox regression analysis of risk factors between survivors and non-survivors was conducted to determine the adjusted risk of death for patients assigned to AM group. RESULTS: Complete daily data from 89 mechanically ventilated patients consecutively admitted to the two units were analyzed. Seventeen patients were included in the AM group, whereas 72 were in the ICU-VENT group. Disease severity and intensity of treatment were comparable between the two groups. The 60-day mortality was significantly higher in the AM group compared to the ICU-vent group (12/17 vs. 27/72, 70.6% vs. 37.5%, respectively, p = 0.016). Allocation to AM group was associated with a significantly increased risk of death after adjusting for covariates (HR 4.05, 95% CI: 1.75–9.33, p = 0.001). Several incidents and complications were reported with Anesthesia Machine care, raising safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that care associated with the use of Anesthesia Machines is inadequate to provide long-term critical care to patients with COVID-19. Added safety risks must be considered if no other option is available to treat severely ill patients during the ongoing pandemic. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01376-9. BioMed Central 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8134805/ /pubmed/34016056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01376-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bottiroli, Maurizio
Calini, Angelo
Pinciroli, Riccardo
Mueller, Ariel
Siragusa, Antonio
Anelli, Carlo
Urman, Richard D.
Nozari, Ala
Berra, Lorenzo
Mondino, Michele
Fumagalli, Roberto
The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_full The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_fullStr The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_full_unstemmed The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_short The repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_sort repurposed use of anesthesia machines to ventilate critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01376-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bottirolimaurizio therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT caliniangelo therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT pinciroliriccardo therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT muellerariel therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT siragusaantonio therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT anellicarlo therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT urmanrichardd therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT nozariala therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT berralorenzo therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT mondinomichele therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT fumagalliroberto therepurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT bottirolimaurizio repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT caliniangelo repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT pinciroliriccardo repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT muellerariel repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT siragusaantonio repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT anellicarlo repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT urmanrichardd repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT nozariala repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT berralorenzo repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT mondinomichele repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT fumagalliroberto repurposeduseofanesthesiamachinestoventilatecriticallyillpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019covid19