Cargando…
Public values and plurality in health priority setting: What to do when people disagree and why we should care about reasons as well as choices
CONTEXT: ‘What does ‘The Public’ think?’ is a question often posed by researchers and policy makers, and public values are regularly invoked to justify policy decisions. Over time there has been a participatory turn in the social and health sciences, including health technology assessment and priori...
Autores principales: | Baker, Rachel, Mason, Helen, McHugh, Neil, Donaldson, Cam |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113892 |
Ejemplares similares
-
We Should Agree to Disagree
por: Park, Joon Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End‐of‐Life Decisions
por: Wilkinson, Dominic, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Tripp, John H, et al.
Publicado: (1995) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Hotopf, Matthew
Publicado: (1995) -
When neurologist and patient disagree on reasonable risk: new challenges in prescribing for patients with multiple sclerosis
por: Kachuck, Norman J
Publicado: (2011)