Cargando…

Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark

OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this article are to systematically review the recent literature on patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth and to investigate how the Danish authorities supervise private eHealth clinics with regard to patient safety. METHODS: Original studies reporting th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svendsen, Mathias T, Tiedemann, Sylvia N, Andersen, Klaus Ejner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211016179
_version_ 1783695321917816832
author Svendsen, Mathias T
Tiedemann, Sylvia N
Andersen, Klaus Ejner
author_facet Svendsen, Mathias T
Tiedemann, Sylvia N
Andersen, Klaus Ejner
author_sort Svendsen, Mathias T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this article are to systematically review the recent literature on patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth and to investigate how the Danish authorities supervise private eHealth clinics with regard to patient safety. METHODS: Original studies reporting the association between patient safety and the use of eHealth as a means of communication between patients and healthcare providers were included. Four literature databases were searched for English-language articles reporting results from cohort studies and clinical trials, published from 2015 until March 2021. Moreover, registered private eHealth clinics in Denmark were evaluated with reference to a recent national audit of patient safety issues in eHealth. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved four intervention studies. The studies did not identify any particular patient safety risks associated with the use of eHealth. Many different authorized healthcare providers (preferably, doctors) apply eHealth in various contexts. eHealth is being used as the only form of contact between the healthcare provider and the patient, as a supplement to patient visitations in an outpatient clinic, or as a tool for communicating between two or more healthcare providers. The regulation of eHealth involves patient safety issues but also has interfaces to marketing, IT systems, and infrastructure. Supervision of eHealth includes the organization of clinics, handling patient charts, prescription medicine, patient legal rights, and patient transition. However, there are many interfaces in the division of responsibilities among the various governmental players. CONCLUSION: eHealth is being used increasingly and in many settings, although recently published intervention studies investigating patient safety issues by the use of eHealth are limited. A structured and continuous governmental control and regulation of patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8135209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81352092021-05-26 Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark Svendsen, Mathias T Tiedemann, Sylvia N Andersen, Klaus Ejner SAGE Open Med Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this article are to systematically review the recent literature on patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth and to investigate how the Danish authorities supervise private eHealth clinics with regard to patient safety. METHODS: Original studies reporting the association between patient safety and the use of eHealth as a means of communication between patients and healthcare providers were included. Four literature databases were searched for English-language articles reporting results from cohort studies and clinical trials, published from 2015 until March 2021. Moreover, registered private eHealth clinics in Denmark were evaluated with reference to a recent national audit of patient safety issues in eHealth. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved four intervention studies. The studies did not identify any particular patient safety risks associated with the use of eHealth. Many different authorized healthcare providers (preferably, doctors) apply eHealth in various contexts. eHealth is being used as the only form of contact between the healthcare provider and the patient, as a supplement to patient visitations in an outpatient clinic, or as a tool for communicating between two or more healthcare providers. The regulation of eHealth involves patient safety issues but also has interfaces to marketing, IT systems, and infrastructure. Supervision of eHealth includes the organization of clinics, handling patient charts, prescription medicine, patient legal rights, and patient transition. However, there are many interfaces in the division of responsibilities among the various governmental players. CONCLUSION: eHealth is being used increasingly and in many settings, although recently published intervention studies investigating patient safety issues by the use of eHealth are limited. A structured and continuous governmental control and regulation of patient safety in relation to the use of eHealth is warranted. SAGE Publications 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8135209/ /pubmed/34046178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211016179 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Svendsen, Mathias T
Tiedemann, Sylvia N
Andersen, Klaus Ejner
Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark
title Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark
title_full Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark
title_fullStr Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark
title_short Pros and cons of eHealth: A systematic review of the literature and observations in Denmark
title_sort pros and cons of ehealth: a systematic review of the literature and observations in denmark
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34046178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20503121211016179
work_keys_str_mv AT svendsenmathiast prosandconsofehealthasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandobservationsindenmark
AT tiedemannsylvian prosandconsofehealthasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandobservationsindenmark
AT andersenklausejner prosandconsofehealthasystematicreviewoftheliteratureandobservationsindenmark