Cargando…

A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model

Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who prev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahl, Astrid K., Hermansen, Åsmund, Osborne, Richard H., Larsen, Marie Hamilton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820926428
_version_ 1783695327618924544
author Wahl, Astrid K.
Hermansen, Åsmund
Osborne, Richard H.
Larsen, Marie Hamilton
author_facet Wahl, Astrid K.
Hermansen, Åsmund
Osborne, Richard H.
Larsen, Marie Hamilton
author_sort Wahl, Astrid K.
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who previously participated in the Norwegian Climate Heliotherapy programme. To investigate the factorial validity of the Norwegian HLQ, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out using Stata. Results: A highly restricted model fit with no cross-loadings or correlated residuals was acceptable for three of the nine scales (‘Feeling understood and supported by health-care providers’, ‘Appraisal of health information’ and ‘Ability to find good health information’). After minor model adjustments of the other scales, one-factor models were acceptable. All scales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Except for three items, all items had high to acceptable factor loadings. Conclusions: This study of the Norwegian HLQ replicates the original factor structure of the Australian HLQ, indicating the questionnaire has cogent and independent scales with good reliability. Researchers, programme implementers and policymakers could use the Norwegian version of the HLQ with confidence to generate reliable information on health literacy for different purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8135233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81352332021-06-07 A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model Wahl, Astrid K. Hermansen, Åsmund Osborne, Richard H. Larsen, Marie Hamilton Scand J Public Health Translation and Validation of Scales and Questionnaires Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who previously participated in the Norwegian Climate Heliotherapy programme. To investigate the factorial validity of the Norwegian HLQ, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out using Stata. Results: A highly restricted model fit with no cross-loadings or correlated residuals was acceptable for three of the nine scales (‘Feeling understood and supported by health-care providers’, ‘Appraisal of health information’ and ‘Ability to find good health information’). After minor model adjustments of the other scales, one-factor models were acceptable. All scales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Except for three items, all items had high to acceptable factor loadings. Conclusions: This study of the Norwegian HLQ replicates the original factor structure of the Australian HLQ, indicating the questionnaire has cogent and independent scales with good reliability. Researchers, programme implementers and policymakers could use the Norwegian version of the HLQ with confidence to generate reliable information on health literacy for different purposes. SAGE Publications 2020-06-07 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8135233/ /pubmed/32508258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820926428 Text en © Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Translation and Validation of Scales and Questionnaires
Wahl, Astrid K.
Hermansen, Åsmund
Osborne, Richard H.
Larsen, Marie Hamilton
A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
title A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
title_full A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
title_fullStr A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
title_full_unstemmed A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
title_short A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
title_sort validation study of the norwegian version of the health literacy questionnaire: a robust nine-dimension factor model
topic Translation and Validation of Scales and Questionnaires
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820926428
work_keys_str_mv AT wahlastridk avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT hermansenasmund avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT osbornerichardh avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT larsenmariehamilton avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT wahlastridk validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT hermansenasmund validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT osbornerichardh validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel
AT larsenmariehamilton validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel