Cargando…
A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model
Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who prev...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820926428 |
_version_ | 1783695327618924544 |
---|---|
author | Wahl, Astrid K. Hermansen, Åsmund Osborne, Richard H. Larsen, Marie Hamilton |
author_facet | Wahl, Astrid K. Hermansen, Åsmund Osborne, Richard H. Larsen, Marie Hamilton |
author_sort | Wahl, Astrid K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who previously participated in the Norwegian Climate Heliotherapy programme. To investigate the factorial validity of the Norwegian HLQ, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out using Stata. Results: A highly restricted model fit with no cross-loadings or correlated residuals was acceptable for three of the nine scales (‘Feeling understood and supported by health-care providers’, ‘Appraisal of health information’ and ‘Ability to find good health information’). After minor model adjustments of the other scales, one-factor models were acceptable. All scales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Except for three items, all items had high to acceptable factor loadings. Conclusions: This study of the Norwegian HLQ replicates the original factor structure of the Australian HLQ, indicating the questionnaire has cogent and independent scales with good reliability. Researchers, programme implementers and policymakers could use the Norwegian version of the HLQ with confidence to generate reliable information on health literacy for different purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8135233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81352332021-06-07 A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model Wahl, Astrid K. Hermansen, Åsmund Osborne, Richard H. Larsen, Marie Hamilton Scand J Public Health Translation and Validation of Scales and Questionnaires Objective: This study aimed to undertake a rigorous psychometric evaluation of the nine-scale Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) based on data from a sample of people with psoriasis. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 825 adults with psoriasis who previously participated in the Norwegian Climate Heliotherapy programme. To investigate the factorial validity of the Norwegian HLQ, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out using Stata. Results: A highly restricted model fit with no cross-loadings or correlated residuals was acceptable for three of the nine scales (‘Feeling understood and supported by health-care providers’, ‘Appraisal of health information’ and ‘Ability to find good health information’). After minor model adjustments of the other scales, one-factor models were acceptable. All scales showed acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.87. Except for three items, all items had high to acceptable factor loadings. Conclusions: This study of the Norwegian HLQ replicates the original factor structure of the Australian HLQ, indicating the questionnaire has cogent and independent scales with good reliability. Researchers, programme implementers and policymakers could use the Norwegian version of the HLQ with confidence to generate reliable information on health literacy for different purposes. SAGE Publications 2020-06-07 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8135233/ /pubmed/32508258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820926428 Text en © Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Translation and Validation of Scales and Questionnaires Wahl, Astrid K. Hermansen, Åsmund Osborne, Richard H. Larsen, Marie Hamilton A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model |
title | A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model |
title_full | A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model |
title_fullStr | A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model |
title_full_unstemmed | A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model |
title_short | A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model |
title_sort | validation study of the norwegian version of the health literacy questionnaire: a robust nine-dimension factor model |
topic | Translation and Validation of Scales and Questionnaires |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32508258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820926428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wahlastridk avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT hermansenasmund avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT osbornerichardh avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT larsenmariehamilton avalidationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT wahlastridk validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT hermansenasmund validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT osbornerichardh validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel AT larsenmariehamilton validationstudyofthenorwegianversionofthehealthliteracyquestionnairearobustninedimensionfactormodel |