Cargando…

Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort

Aims: To investigate potential differences between participants and dropouts in the 2005 follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort Study regarding the prevalence of commonly studied health determinants and whether these factors had differential associations with three health outcomes: all-cause m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canivet, Catarina, Nilsson, Anton, Björk, Jonas, Moghaddassi, Mahnaz, Östergren, Per-Olof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820919544
_version_ 1783695330057912320
author Canivet, Catarina
Nilsson, Anton
Björk, Jonas
Moghaddassi, Mahnaz
Östergren, Per-Olof
author_facet Canivet, Catarina
Nilsson, Anton
Björk, Jonas
Moghaddassi, Mahnaz
Östergren, Per-Olof
author_sort Canivet, Catarina
collection PubMed
description Aims: To investigate potential differences between participants and dropouts in the 2005 follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort Study regarding the prevalence of commonly studied health determinants and whether these factors had differential associations with three health outcomes: all-cause mortality and purchase of prescribed cardiovascular or psychotropic drugs during a 10-year follow-up period. Methods: The Scania Public Health Cohort was initiated in 1999/2000, with randomly invited participants aged 18–80 years from the general population (58% participation). Questionnaire data from 10,462 participants and 2576 dropouts in the 2005 follow-up (80% participation) were linked to public registers on mortality and purchase of prescribed drugs. Results: Age, male gender, being born abroad, low educational level, low self-rated mental and general health and daily smoking were all related to dropping out. The 10-year mortality was higher among dropouts (13.4% versus 11.9%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–1.8). In 13 out of 18 analyses, similar associations between health determinants and outcomes were found across participants and dropouts. However, being born outside of Sweden was associated with higher risks for all three poor health outcomes among participants, but not so among dropouts. Conclusions: Despite selective participation at follow-up, there was little evidence of selection bias, insofar as estimated associations were generally similar across participants, dropouts and the whole cohort. This finding is important for the assessment of the validity of prospective findings from this cohort and similar ones, where the loss of individuals at consecutive follow-ups of exposure is non-negligible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8135243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81352432021-06-07 Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort Canivet, Catarina Nilsson, Anton Björk, Jonas Moghaddassi, Mahnaz Östergren, Per-Olof Scand J Public Health Selection Bias in Cohort Studies Aims: To investigate potential differences between participants and dropouts in the 2005 follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort Study regarding the prevalence of commonly studied health determinants and whether these factors had differential associations with three health outcomes: all-cause mortality and purchase of prescribed cardiovascular or psychotropic drugs during a 10-year follow-up period. Methods: The Scania Public Health Cohort was initiated in 1999/2000, with randomly invited participants aged 18–80 years from the general population (58% participation). Questionnaire data from 10,462 participants and 2576 dropouts in the 2005 follow-up (80% participation) were linked to public registers on mortality and purchase of prescribed drugs. Results: Age, male gender, being born abroad, low educational level, low self-rated mental and general health and daily smoking were all related to dropping out. The 10-year mortality was higher among dropouts (13.4% versus 11.9%; age-adjusted hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–1.8). In 13 out of 18 analyses, similar associations between health determinants and outcomes were found across participants and dropouts. However, being born outside of Sweden was associated with higher risks for all three poor health outcomes among participants, but not so among dropouts. Conclusions: Despite selective participation at follow-up, there was little evidence of selection bias, insofar as estimated associations were generally similar across participants, dropouts and the whole cohort. This finding is important for the assessment of the validity of prospective findings from this cohort and similar ones, where the loss of individuals at consecutive follow-ups of exposure is non-negligible. SAGE Publications 2020-05-28 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8135243/ /pubmed/32466718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820919544 Text en © Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Selection Bias in Cohort Studies
Canivet, Catarina
Nilsson, Anton
Björk, Jonas
Moghaddassi, Mahnaz
Östergren, Per-Olof
Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort
title Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort
title_full Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort
title_fullStr Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort
title_short Assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the Scania Public Health Cohort
title_sort assessment of selection bias due to dropouts in the follow-up of the scania public health cohort
topic Selection Bias in Cohort Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820919544
work_keys_str_mv AT canivetcatarina assessmentofselectionbiasduetodropoutsinthefollowupofthescaniapublichealthcohort
AT nilssonanton assessmentofselectionbiasduetodropoutsinthefollowupofthescaniapublichealthcohort
AT bjorkjonas assessmentofselectionbiasduetodropoutsinthefollowupofthescaniapublichealthcohort
AT moghaddassimahnaz assessmentofselectionbiasduetodropoutsinthefollowupofthescaniapublichealthcohort
AT ostergrenperolof assessmentofselectionbiasduetodropoutsinthefollowupofthescaniapublichealthcohort