Cargando…

A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficacious treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, ~20% of patients are dissatisfied with the results. We determined which factors contribute to patient satisfaction and compared the various scoring systems before and after surgery. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jinyu, Yang, Yi, Wan, Shengcheng, Yao, Zhenjun, Zhang, Ying, Zhang, Yueqi, Shi, Peng, Zhang, Chi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02469-4
_version_ 1783695386571964416
author Liu, Jinyu
Yang, Yi
Wan, Shengcheng
Yao, Zhenjun
Zhang, Ying
Zhang, Yueqi
Shi, Peng
Zhang, Chi
author_facet Liu, Jinyu
Yang, Yi
Wan, Shengcheng
Yao, Zhenjun
Zhang, Ying
Zhang, Yueqi
Shi, Peng
Zhang, Chi
author_sort Liu, Jinyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficacious treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, ~20% of patients are dissatisfied with the results. We determined which factors contribute to patient satisfaction and compared the various scoring systems before and after surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 545 patients were enrolled and evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patient demographics, as well as scores for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form (SF)-12, and 1989 Knee Society Clinical Rating System (1989 KSS), were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The possible predictors were introduced into a prediction model. Scores for overall satisfaction and the 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS) were also assessed after TKA to identify the accuracy and agreement of the systems. RESULTS: There were 134 male patients and 411 female patients, with an overall prevalence of satisfaction of 83.7% 1 year after surgery. A history of surgery (p < 0.001) and the 1989 KSS and SF-12 were of the utmost importance in the prediction model, whereas the WOMAC score had a vital role postoperatively (change in WOMAC pain score, p < 0.001; change in WOMAC physical function score, p < 0.001; postoperative WOMAC pain score, p = 0.004). C-index of model was 0.898 > 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a p value of 0.586, and the AUC of external cohort was 0.953 (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.97). The agreement between the assessment of overall satisfaction and the 2011 KSS satisfaction assessment was general (Kappa=0.437 > 0.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A history of surgery, the preoperative 1989 KSS, and the preoperative SF-12 influenced patient satisfaction after primary TKA. We recommend the WOMAC (particularly the pain subscale score) to reflect overall patient satisfaction postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81361582021-05-21 A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study Liu, Jinyu Yang, Yi Wan, Shengcheng Yao, Zhenjun Zhang, Ying Zhang, Yueqi Shi, Peng Zhang, Chi J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficacious treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis, ~20% of patients are dissatisfied with the results. We determined which factors contribute to patient satisfaction and compared the various scoring systems before and after surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 545 patients were enrolled and evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patient demographics, as well as scores for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form (SF)-12, and 1989 Knee Society Clinical Rating System (1989 KSS), were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The possible predictors were introduced into a prediction model. Scores for overall satisfaction and the 2011 Knee Society Score (2011 KSS) were also assessed after TKA to identify the accuracy and agreement of the systems. RESULTS: There were 134 male patients and 411 female patients, with an overall prevalence of satisfaction of 83.7% 1 year after surgery. A history of surgery (p < 0.001) and the 1989 KSS and SF-12 were of the utmost importance in the prediction model, whereas the WOMAC score had a vital role postoperatively (change in WOMAC pain score, p < 0.001; change in WOMAC physical function score, p < 0.001; postoperative WOMAC pain score, p = 0.004). C-index of model was 0.898 > 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a p value of 0.586, and the AUC of external cohort was 0.953 (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.97). The agreement between the assessment of overall satisfaction and the 2011 KSS satisfaction assessment was general (Kappa=0.437 > 0.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A history of surgery, the preoperative 1989 KSS, and the preoperative SF-12 influenced patient satisfaction after primary TKA. We recommend the WOMAC (particularly the pain subscale score) to reflect overall patient satisfaction postoperatively. BioMed Central 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8136158/ /pubmed/34016153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02469-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Jinyu
Yang, Yi
Wan, Shengcheng
Yao, Zhenjun
Zhang, Ying
Zhang, Yueqi
Shi, Peng
Zhang, Chi
A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
title A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
title_full A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
title_short A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty and the roles of different scoring systems: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02469-4
work_keys_str_mv AT liujinyu anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangyi anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wanshengcheng anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yaozhenjun anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangying anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangyueqi anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shipeng anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangchi anewpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liujinyu newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangyi newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wanshengcheng newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yaozhenjun newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangying newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangyueqi newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shipeng newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangchi newpredictionmodelforpatientsatisfactionaftertotalkneearthroplastyandtherolesofdifferentscoringsystemsaretrospectivecohortstudy