Cargando…

Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)

BACKGROUND: Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus are reaching epidemic proportions. In morbidly obese patients, bariatric operations lead to sustained weight loss and relief of comorbidities in the majority of patients. Laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most frequently performe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraljević, Marko, Schneider, Romano, Wölnerhanssen, Bettina, Bueter, Marco, Delko, Tarik, Peterli, Ralph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05313-6
_version_ 1783695397778096128
author Kraljević, Marko
Schneider, Romano
Wölnerhanssen, Bettina
Bueter, Marco
Delko, Tarik
Peterli, Ralph
author_facet Kraljević, Marko
Schneider, Romano
Wölnerhanssen, Bettina
Bueter, Marco
Delko, Tarik
Peterli, Ralph
author_sort Kraljević, Marko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus are reaching epidemic proportions. In morbidly obese patients, bariatric operations lead to sustained weight loss and relief of comorbidities in the majority of patients. Laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most frequently performed operations, but it is still unknown why some patients respond better than others. Therefore, a number of variations of this operation have been introduced. Recent evidence suggests that a longer bypassed biliopancreatic limb (BPL) has the potential to be more effective compared to the standard RYGB with a shorter BPL length. This article describes the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of a RYGB operation with a long versus short BPL. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded trial. The relevant ethics committee has approved the trial protocol. To demonstrate that long BPL RYGB is superior compared to short BPL RYGB in terms of weight loss and resolution of T2DM, the study is conducted as a superiority trial. Postoperative percent total weight loss and nutritional deficiency rate are the primary endpoints, whereas morbidity, mortality, remission of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life are secondary endpoints. Eight hundred patients, between 18 and 65 years and with a body mass index (BMI) from 35 to 60 kg/m(2) who meet the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Switzerland, will be randomized. The endpoints and baseline measurements will be assessed pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. DISCUSSION: With its high number of patients and a 5-year follow-up, this study will answer questions about effectiveness and safety of long BPL RYGB and provide level I evidence for improvement of the standard RYGB. These findings might therefore potentially influence global bariatric surgery guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219787. Registered on 7 January 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05313-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81362102021-05-21 Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM) Kraljević, Marko Schneider, Romano Wölnerhanssen, Bettina Bueter, Marco Delko, Tarik Peterli, Ralph Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus are reaching epidemic proportions. In morbidly obese patients, bariatric operations lead to sustained weight loss and relief of comorbidities in the majority of patients. Laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most frequently performed operations, but it is still unknown why some patients respond better than others. Therefore, a number of variations of this operation have been introduced. Recent evidence suggests that a longer bypassed biliopancreatic limb (BPL) has the potential to be more effective compared to the standard RYGB with a shorter BPL length. This article describes the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of a RYGB operation with a long versus short BPL. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, patient- and observer-blinded trial. The relevant ethics committee has approved the trial protocol. To demonstrate that long BPL RYGB is superior compared to short BPL RYGB in terms of weight loss and resolution of T2DM, the study is conducted as a superiority trial. Postoperative percent total weight loss and nutritional deficiency rate are the primary endpoints, whereas morbidity, mortality, remission of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life are secondary endpoints. Eight hundred patients, between 18 and 65 years and with a body mass index (BMI) from 35 to 60 kg/m(2) who meet the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Switzerland, will be randomized. The endpoints and baseline measurements will be assessed pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. DISCUSSION: With its high number of patients and a 5-year follow-up, this study will answer questions about effectiveness and safety of long BPL RYGB and provide level I evidence for improvement of the standard RYGB. These findings might therefore potentially influence global bariatric surgery guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219787. Registered on 7 January 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05313-6. BioMed Central 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8136210/ /pubmed/34011386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05313-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kraljević, Marko
Schneider, Romano
Wölnerhanssen, Bettina
Bueter, Marco
Delko, Tarik
Peterli, Ralph
Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)
title Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)
title_full Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)
title_fullStr Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)
title_full_unstemmed Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)
title_short Different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a Swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (SLIM)
title_sort different limb lengths in gastric bypass surgery: study protocol for a swiss multicenter randomized controlled trial (slim)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34011386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05313-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kraljevicmarko differentlimblengthsingastricbypasssurgerystudyprotocolforaswissmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialslim
AT schneiderromano differentlimblengthsingastricbypasssurgerystudyprotocolforaswissmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialslim
AT wolnerhanssenbettina differentlimblengthsingastricbypasssurgerystudyprotocolforaswissmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialslim
AT buetermarco differentlimblengthsingastricbypasssurgerystudyprotocolforaswissmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialslim
AT delkotarik differentlimblengthsingastricbypasssurgerystudyprotocolforaswissmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialslim
AT peterliralph differentlimblengthsingastricbypasssurgerystudyprotocolforaswissmulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialslim