Cargando…

Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Two minimally invasive approaches showed some advantages in outcomes compared to conventional approaches (CAs)—the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach in THA (SuperPATH). To the best of our knowledge, DAA and SuperPATH have never been com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadanov, Nikolai, Bueschges, Simon, Liu, Kuiliang, Lazaru, Philip, Marintschev, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7
_version_ 1783695400634417152
author Ramadanov, Nikolai
Bueschges, Simon
Liu, Kuiliang
Lazaru, Philip
Marintschev, Ivan
author_facet Ramadanov, Nikolai
Bueschges, Simon
Liu, Kuiliang
Lazaru, Philip
Marintschev, Ivan
author_sort Ramadanov, Nikolai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two minimally invasive approaches showed some advantages in outcomes compared to conventional approaches (CAs)—the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach in THA (SuperPATH). To the best of our knowledge, DAA and SuperPATH have never been compared, neither in clinical studies, nor in a meta-analysis. To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short-term outcomes of DAA and SuperPATH in total hip joint arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SuperPATH with CAs and DAA with CAs in THA. We measured surgical, functional, and radiological outcomes. A network meta-analysis, using frequentist methods, was performed to assess treatment effects between DAA and SuperPATH. Information was borrowed from the above-mentioned RCTs, using the CA group as a common comparator. RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs involving 1392 patients met the inclusion criteria, three trials with a level I evidence, 13 trials with a level II evidence. The overall network meta-analysis showed that SuperPATH reduced operation time (fixed effect model: MD = 12.8, 95% CI 9.9 to 15.7), incision length (fixed effect model: MD = 4.3, 95% CI 4.0 to 4.5; random effect model: MD = 4.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 8.4), intraoperative blood loss (fixed effect model: MD = 58.6, 95% CI 40.4 to 76.8), and early pain intensity (VAS 1 day postoperatively with a fixed effect model: MD = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). The two approaches did not differ in acetabular cup positioning angles and in functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our overall findings suggested that the short-term outcomes of THA through SuperPATH were superior to DAA. SuperPATH showed better results in decreasing operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and early pain intensity. DAA and SuperPATH were equal in functional outcome and acetabular cup positioning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81362232021-05-21 Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Ramadanov, Nikolai Bueschges, Simon Liu, Kuiliang Lazaru, Philip Marintschev, Ivan J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Two minimally invasive approaches showed some advantages in outcomes compared to conventional approaches (CAs)—the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach in THA (SuperPATH). To the best of our knowledge, DAA and SuperPATH have never been compared, neither in clinical studies, nor in a meta-analysis. To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short-term outcomes of DAA and SuperPATH in total hip joint arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SuperPATH with CAs and DAA with CAs in THA. We measured surgical, functional, and radiological outcomes. A network meta-analysis, using frequentist methods, was performed to assess treatment effects between DAA and SuperPATH. Information was borrowed from the above-mentioned RCTs, using the CA group as a common comparator. RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs involving 1392 patients met the inclusion criteria, three trials with a level I evidence, 13 trials with a level II evidence. The overall network meta-analysis showed that SuperPATH reduced operation time (fixed effect model: MD = 12.8, 95% CI 9.9 to 15.7), incision length (fixed effect model: MD = 4.3, 95% CI 4.0 to 4.5; random effect model: MD = 4.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 8.4), intraoperative blood loss (fixed effect model: MD = 58.6, 95% CI 40.4 to 76.8), and early pain intensity (VAS 1 day postoperatively with a fixed effect model: MD = 0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). The two approaches did not differ in acetabular cup positioning angles and in functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our overall findings suggested that the short-term outcomes of THA through SuperPATH were superior to DAA. SuperPATH showed better results in decreasing operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and early pain intensity. DAA and SuperPATH were equal in functional outcome and acetabular cup positioning. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7. BioMed Central 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8136223/ /pubmed/34016136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ramadanov, Nikolai
Bueschges, Simon
Liu, Kuiliang
Lazaru, Philip
Marintschev, Ivan
Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (daa) and superpath in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadanovnikolai comparisonofshorttermoutcomesbetweendirectanteriorapproachdaaandsuperpathintotalhipreplacementasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bueschgessimon comparisonofshorttermoutcomesbetweendirectanteriorapproachdaaandsuperpathintotalhipreplacementasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liukuiliang comparisonofshorttermoutcomesbetweendirectanteriorapproachdaaandsuperpathintotalhipreplacementasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lazaruphilip comparisonofshorttermoutcomesbetweendirectanteriorapproachdaaandsuperpathintotalhipreplacementasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT marintschevivan comparisonofshorttermoutcomesbetweendirectanteriorapproachdaaandsuperpathintotalhipreplacementasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials