Cargando…

A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs

Background: Ireland’s health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie, Fox, Robert, Mannion, Marese, Joyce, David, De Brún, Aoife, Glynn, Liam, Ryan, Damien, Keane, Niamh, McAuliffe, Eilish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056538
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2
_version_ 1783695404457525248
author Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie
Fox, Robert
Mannion, Marese
Joyce, David
De Brún, Aoife
Glynn, Liam
Ryan, Damien
Keane, Niamh
McAuliffe, Eilish
author_facet Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie
Fox, Robert
Mannion, Marese
Joyce, David
De Brún, Aoife
Glynn, Liam
Ryan, Damien
Keane, Niamh
McAuliffe, Eilish
author_sort Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Background: Ireland’s health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched system. COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs (CAHs) were established to mitigate unnecessary admission to acute hospitals, and reduce infection spread by supporting COVID-19 positive or suspected positive patients to isolate at home, or in isolation facilities. There is some evidence that similar assessment centres may be a successful triage strategy to reduce burden on hospital and acute care. Aim : The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs on service delivery in two regions in Ireland during the pandemic. Methods: A mixed-methods approach will be used, incorporating co-design to engage stakeholders and ensure informed data capture and analysis. Online surveys will assess CAH patients’ experiences of access to and quality of care. Clinical patient data from CAHs will be collected and analysed using multinomial logistic regression to check for association with patient demographics and COVID-19 symptoms, and CAH early warning scores and outcomes (Transfer to Emergency Department, Transfer to isolation unit, Sent home with care plan). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with: patients to elicit an in-depth understanding of experiences and acceptability of attending CAHs; and staff to understand challenges, benefits, and effectiveness of CAHs. Interview data will be analysed using thematic analysis. Discussion: This study will provide valuable insights from both patient and staff perspectives on the operation of CAHs. We will evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of CAHs and propose areas for improvement of the service. This will contribute to international literature on the use of community assessment centres during infectious disease pandemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81362522021-05-28 A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie Fox, Robert Mannion, Marese Joyce, David De Brún, Aoife Glynn, Liam Ryan, Damien Keane, Niamh McAuliffe, Eilish HRB Open Res Study Protocol Background: Ireland’s health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched system. COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs (CAHs) were established to mitigate unnecessary admission to acute hospitals, and reduce infection spread by supporting COVID-19 positive or suspected positive patients to isolate at home, or in isolation facilities. There is some evidence that similar assessment centres may be a successful triage strategy to reduce burden on hospital and acute care. Aim : The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs on service delivery in two regions in Ireland during the pandemic. Methods: A mixed-methods approach will be used, incorporating co-design to engage stakeholders and ensure informed data capture and analysis. Online surveys will assess CAH patients’ experiences of access to and quality of care. Clinical patient data from CAHs will be collected and analysed using multinomial logistic regression to check for association with patient demographics and COVID-19 symptoms, and CAH early warning scores and outcomes (Transfer to Emergency Department, Transfer to isolation unit, Sent home with care plan). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with: patients to elicit an in-depth understanding of experiences and acceptability of attending CAHs; and staff to understand challenges, benefits, and effectiveness of CAHs. Interview data will be analysed using thematic analysis. Discussion: This study will provide valuable insights from both patient and staff perspectives on the operation of CAHs. We will evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of CAHs and propose areas for improvement of the service. This will contribute to international literature on the use of community assessment centres during infectious disease pandemics. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8136252/ /pubmed/34056538 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Mulcahy Symmons S et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie
Fox, Robert
Mannion, Marese
Joyce, David
De Brún, Aoife
Glynn, Liam
Ryan, Damien
Keane, Niamh
McAuliffe, Eilish
A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
title A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
title_full A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
title_fullStr A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
title_short A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
title_sort mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of covid-19 community assessment hubs
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056538
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2
work_keys_str_mv AT mulcahysymmonssophie amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT foxrobert amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT mannionmarese amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT joycedavid amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT debrunaoife amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT glynnliam amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT ryandamien amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT keaneniamh amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT mcauliffeeilish amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT mulcahysymmonssophie mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT foxrobert mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT mannionmarese mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT joycedavid mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT debrunaoife mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT glynnliam mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT ryandamien mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT keaneniamh mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs
AT mcauliffeeilish mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs