Cargando…
A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs
Background: Ireland’s health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056538 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2 |
_version_ | 1783695404457525248 |
---|---|
author | Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie Fox, Robert Mannion, Marese Joyce, David De Brún, Aoife Glynn, Liam Ryan, Damien Keane, Niamh McAuliffe, Eilish |
author_facet | Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie Fox, Robert Mannion, Marese Joyce, David De Brún, Aoife Glynn, Liam Ryan, Damien Keane, Niamh McAuliffe, Eilish |
author_sort | Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Ireland’s health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched system. COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs (CAHs) were established to mitigate unnecessary admission to acute hospitals, and reduce infection spread by supporting COVID-19 positive or suspected positive patients to isolate at home, or in isolation facilities. There is some evidence that similar assessment centres may be a successful triage strategy to reduce burden on hospital and acute care. Aim : The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs on service delivery in two regions in Ireland during the pandemic. Methods: A mixed-methods approach will be used, incorporating co-design to engage stakeholders and ensure informed data capture and analysis. Online surveys will assess CAH patients’ experiences of access to and quality of care. Clinical patient data from CAHs will be collected and analysed using multinomial logistic regression to check for association with patient demographics and COVID-19 symptoms, and CAH early warning scores and outcomes (Transfer to Emergency Department, Transfer to isolation unit, Sent home with care plan). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with: patients to elicit an in-depth understanding of experiences and acceptability of attending CAHs; and staff to understand challenges, benefits, and effectiveness of CAHs. Interview data will be analysed using thematic analysis. Discussion: This study will provide valuable insights from both patient and staff perspectives on the operation of CAHs. We will evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of CAHs and propose areas for improvement of the service. This will contribute to international literature on the use of community assessment centres during infectious disease pandemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8136252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81362522021-05-28 A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie Fox, Robert Mannion, Marese Joyce, David De Brún, Aoife Glynn, Liam Ryan, Damien Keane, Niamh McAuliffe, Eilish HRB Open Res Study Protocol Background: Ireland’s health system has been under significant strain due to staff shortages and inadequate capacity. Critical care bed capacity per capita in Ireland is among the lowest in Europe, thus, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put additional strain on an over-stretched system. COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs (CAHs) were established to mitigate unnecessary admission to acute hospitals, and reduce infection spread by supporting COVID-19 positive or suspected positive patients to isolate at home, or in isolation facilities. There is some evidence that similar assessment centres may be a successful triage strategy to reduce burden on hospital and acute care. Aim : The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs on service delivery in two regions in Ireland during the pandemic. Methods: A mixed-methods approach will be used, incorporating co-design to engage stakeholders and ensure informed data capture and analysis. Online surveys will assess CAH patients’ experiences of access to and quality of care. Clinical patient data from CAHs will be collected and analysed using multinomial logistic regression to check for association with patient demographics and COVID-19 symptoms, and CAH early warning scores and outcomes (Transfer to Emergency Department, Transfer to isolation unit, Sent home with care plan). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with: patients to elicit an in-depth understanding of experiences and acceptability of attending CAHs; and staff to understand challenges, benefits, and effectiveness of CAHs. Interview data will be analysed using thematic analysis. Discussion: This study will provide valuable insights from both patient and staff perspectives on the operation of CAHs. We will evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of CAHs and propose areas for improvement of the service. This will contribute to international literature on the use of community assessment centres during infectious disease pandemics. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8136252/ /pubmed/34056538 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Mulcahy Symmons S et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mulcahy Symmons, Sophie Fox, Robert Mannion, Marese Joyce, David De Brún, Aoife Glynn, Liam Ryan, Damien Keane, Niamh McAuliffe, Eilish A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs |
title | A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs |
title_full | A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs |
title_fullStr | A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs |
title_full_unstemmed | A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs |
title_short | A mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of COVID-19 Community Assessment Hubs |
title_sort | mixed methods protocol to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of covid-19 community assessment hubs |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056538 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13217.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulcahysymmonssophie amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT foxrobert amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT mannionmarese amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT joycedavid amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT debrunaoife amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT glynnliam amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT ryandamien amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT keaneniamh amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT mcauliffeeilish amixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT mulcahysymmonssophie mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT foxrobert mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT mannionmarese mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT joycedavid mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT debrunaoife mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT glynnliam mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT ryandamien mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT keaneniamh mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs AT mcauliffeeilish mixedmethodsprotocoltoevaluatetheeffectivenessandacceptabilityofcovid19communityassessmenthubs |