Cargando…
The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine init...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945494 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28845 |
_version_ | 1783695437076627456 |
---|---|
author | Halabi, Reem Smith, Geoffrey Sylwestrzak, Marc Clay, Brian Longhurst, Christopher A Lander, Lina |
author_facet | Halabi, Reem Smith, Geoffrey Sylwestrzak, Marc Clay, Brian Longhurst, Christopher A Lander, Lina |
author_sort | Halabi, Reem |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine initiatives need to be evaluated as the number of COVID-19 inpatients is expected to continue declining. In this viewpoint, we describe the use of a rapidly deployed inpatient telemedicine workflow at a large academic medical center and discuss the potential impact on PPE savings. In early 2020, videoconferencing software was installed on patient bedside iPads at two academic medical center teaching hospitals. An internal website allowed providers to initiate video calls with patients in any patient room with an activated iPad, including both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 patients. Patients were encouraged to use telemedicine technology to connect with loved ones via native apps or videoconferencing software. We evaluated the use of telemedicine technology on patients’ bedside iPads by monitoring traffic to the internal website. Between May 2020 and March 2021, there were a total of 1240 active users of the Video Visits website (mean 112.7, SD 49.0 connection events per month). Of these, 133 (10.7%) connections were made. Patients initiated 63 (47.4%) video calls with family or friends and sent 37 (27.8%) emails with videoconference connection instructions. Providers initiated a total of 33 (24.8%) video calls with the majority of calls initiated in August (n=22, 67%). There was a low level of adoption of inpatient telemedicine capability by providers and patients. With sufficient availability of PPE, inpatient providers did not find a frequent need to use the bedside telemedicine technology, despite a high census of patients with COVID-19. Compared to providers, patients used videoconferencing capabilities more frequently in September and October 2020. We did not find savings of PPE associated with the use of inpatient telemedicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8136403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81364032021-05-25 The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study Halabi, Reem Smith, Geoffrey Sylwestrzak, Marc Clay, Brian Longhurst, Christopher A Lander, Lina J Med Internet Res Viewpoint With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine initiatives need to be evaluated as the number of COVID-19 inpatients is expected to continue declining. In this viewpoint, we describe the use of a rapidly deployed inpatient telemedicine workflow at a large academic medical center and discuss the potential impact on PPE savings. In early 2020, videoconferencing software was installed on patient bedside iPads at two academic medical center teaching hospitals. An internal website allowed providers to initiate video calls with patients in any patient room with an activated iPad, including both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 patients. Patients were encouraged to use telemedicine technology to connect with loved ones via native apps or videoconferencing software. We evaluated the use of telemedicine technology on patients’ bedside iPads by monitoring traffic to the internal website. Between May 2020 and March 2021, there were a total of 1240 active users of the Video Visits website (mean 112.7, SD 49.0 connection events per month). Of these, 133 (10.7%) connections were made. Patients initiated 63 (47.4%) video calls with family or friends and sent 37 (27.8%) emails with videoconference connection instructions. Providers initiated a total of 33 (24.8%) video calls with the majority of calls initiated in August (n=22, 67%). There was a low level of adoption of inpatient telemedicine capability by providers and patients. With sufficient availability of PPE, inpatient providers did not find a frequent need to use the bedside telemedicine technology, despite a high census of patients with COVID-19. Compared to providers, patients used videoconferencing capabilities more frequently in September and October 2020. We did not find savings of PPE associated with the use of inpatient telemedicine. JMIR Publications 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8136403/ /pubmed/33945494 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28845 Text en ©Reem Halabi, Geoffrey Smith, Marc Sylwestrzak, Brian Clay, Christopher A Longhurst, Lina Lander. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 19.05.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Halabi, Reem Smith, Geoffrey Sylwestrzak, Marc Clay, Brian Longhurst, Christopher A Lander, Lina The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study |
title | The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study |
title_full | The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study |
title_short | The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study |
title_sort | impact of inpatient telemedicine on personal protective equipment savings during the covid-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945494 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halabireem theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT smithgeoffrey theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT sylwestrzakmarc theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT claybrian theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT longhurstchristophera theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT landerlina theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT halabireem impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT smithgeoffrey impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT sylwestrzakmarc impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT claybrian impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT longhurstchristophera impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy AT landerlina impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy |