Cargando…

The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine init...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halabi, Reem, Smith, Geoffrey, Sylwestrzak, Marc, Clay, Brian, Longhurst, Christopher A, Lander, Lina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945494
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28845
_version_ 1783695437076627456
author Halabi, Reem
Smith, Geoffrey
Sylwestrzak, Marc
Clay, Brian
Longhurst, Christopher A
Lander, Lina
author_facet Halabi, Reem
Smith, Geoffrey
Sylwestrzak, Marc
Clay, Brian
Longhurst, Christopher A
Lander, Lina
author_sort Halabi, Reem
collection PubMed
description With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine initiatives need to be evaluated as the number of COVID-19 inpatients is expected to continue declining. In this viewpoint, we describe the use of a rapidly deployed inpatient telemedicine workflow at a large academic medical center and discuss the potential impact on PPE savings. In early 2020, videoconferencing software was installed on patient bedside iPads at two academic medical center teaching hospitals. An internal website allowed providers to initiate video calls with patients in any patient room with an activated iPad, including both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 patients. Patients were encouraged to use telemedicine technology to connect with loved ones via native apps or videoconferencing software. We evaluated the use of telemedicine technology on patients’ bedside iPads by monitoring traffic to the internal website. Between May 2020 and March 2021, there were a total of 1240 active users of the Video Visits website (mean 112.7, SD 49.0 connection events per month). Of these, 133 (10.7%) connections were made. Patients initiated 63 (47.4%) video calls with family or friends and sent 37 (27.8%) emails with videoconference connection instructions. Providers initiated a total of 33 (24.8%) video calls with the majority of calls initiated in August (n=22, 67%). There was a low level of adoption of inpatient telemedicine capability by providers and patients. With sufficient availability of PPE, inpatient providers did not find a frequent need to use the bedside telemedicine technology, despite a high census of patients with COVID-19. Compared to providers, patients used videoconferencing capabilities more frequently in September and October 2020. We did not find savings of PPE associated with the use of inpatient telemedicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81364032021-05-25 The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study Halabi, Reem Smith, Geoffrey Sylwestrzak, Marc Clay, Brian Longhurst, Christopher A Lander, Lina J Med Internet Res Viewpoint With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine initiatives need to be evaluated as the number of COVID-19 inpatients is expected to continue declining. In this viewpoint, we describe the use of a rapidly deployed inpatient telemedicine workflow at a large academic medical center and discuss the potential impact on PPE savings. In early 2020, videoconferencing software was installed on patient bedside iPads at two academic medical center teaching hospitals. An internal website allowed providers to initiate video calls with patients in any patient room with an activated iPad, including both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 patients. Patients were encouraged to use telemedicine technology to connect with loved ones via native apps or videoconferencing software. We evaluated the use of telemedicine technology on patients’ bedside iPads by monitoring traffic to the internal website. Between May 2020 and March 2021, there were a total of 1240 active users of the Video Visits website (mean 112.7, SD 49.0 connection events per month). Of these, 133 (10.7%) connections were made. Patients initiated 63 (47.4%) video calls with family or friends and sent 37 (27.8%) emails with videoconference connection instructions. Providers initiated a total of 33 (24.8%) video calls with the majority of calls initiated in August (n=22, 67%). There was a low level of adoption of inpatient telemedicine capability by providers and patients. With sufficient availability of PPE, inpatient providers did not find a frequent need to use the bedside telemedicine technology, despite a high census of patients with COVID-19. Compared to providers, patients used videoconferencing capabilities more frequently in September and October 2020. We did not find savings of PPE associated with the use of inpatient telemedicine. JMIR Publications 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8136403/ /pubmed/33945494 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28845 Text en ©Reem Halabi, Geoffrey Smith, Marc Sylwestrzak, Brian Clay, Christopher A Longhurst, Lina Lander. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 19.05.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Halabi, Reem
Smith, Geoffrey
Sylwestrzak, Marc
Clay, Brian
Longhurst, Christopher A
Lander, Lina
The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
title The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
title_full The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
title_short The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study
title_sort impact of inpatient telemedicine on personal protective equipment savings during the covid-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945494
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28845
work_keys_str_mv AT halabireem theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT smithgeoffrey theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT sylwestrzakmarc theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT claybrian theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT longhurstchristophera theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT landerlina theimpactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT halabireem impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT smithgeoffrey impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT sylwestrzakmarc impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT claybrian impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT longhurstchristophera impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy
AT landerlina impactofinpatienttelemedicineonpersonalprotectiveequipmentsavingsduringthecovid19pandemiccrosssectionalstudy