Cargando…

Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are often treated with antibiotics and are a source of antibiotic overuse. AIM: To systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult women in the community with a history of recurrent UTIs and who use methenamine hippurate prophylactically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakhit, Mina, Krzyzaniak, Natalia, Hilder, Joanne, Clark, Justin, Scott, Anna Mae, Mar, Chris Del
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001538
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0833
_version_ 1783695461273567232
author Bakhit, Mina
Krzyzaniak, Natalia
Hilder, Joanne
Clark, Justin
Scott, Anna Mae
Mar, Chris Del
author_facet Bakhit, Mina
Krzyzaniak, Natalia
Hilder, Joanne
Clark, Justin
Scott, Anna Mae
Mar, Chris Del
author_sort Bakhit, Mina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are often treated with antibiotics and are a source of antibiotic overuse. AIM: To systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult women in the community with a history of recurrent UTIs and who use methenamine hippurate prophylactically. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of women in the UK, Australia, Norway, and US (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent UTIs receiving methenamine hippurate against placebo or no treatment, and antibiotics. METHOD: The authors searched three databases, clinical trial registries, and performed forward–backward citation analysis on references of included studies. RESULTS: Six studies involving 557 participants were included (447 were analysed). Of the six studies, five were published and one was an unpublished trial record with results, three compared methenamine hippurate against placebo or control, and three compared methenamine hippurate with antibiotics. For the number of patients who remained asymptomatic, methenamine hippurate showed a non-statistically significant trend of benefit versus antibiotics over 12 months (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40 to 1.07, I(2) 49%), versus control over 6 or 12 months (RR 0.56, 95% CI = 0.13 to 2.35, I(2) 93%), and a non-statistically significant trend versus any antibiotic for abacteruria (RR 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.03, I(2) 23%). A similar non-statistically significant trend of benefits for methenamine hippurate for the number of UTI or bacteriuric episodes was found, and a non-statistically significant difference in the number of patients experiencing adverse events between methenamine hippurate and any comparator, with a trend towards benefit for the methenamine hippurate, was identified. Antibiotic use and resistance were not consistently reported. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to be certain of the benefits of methenamine hippurate to prevent UTI. Further research is needed to test the drug’s effectiveness in preventing UTIs and as an alternative for antibiotic treatment for UTI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8136580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81365802021-05-24 Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bakhit, Mina Krzyzaniak, Natalia Hilder, Joanne Clark, Justin Scott, Anna Mae Mar, Chris Del Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are often treated with antibiotics and are a source of antibiotic overuse. AIM: To systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult women in the community with a history of recurrent UTIs and who use methenamine hippurate prophylactically. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of women in the UK, Australia, Norway, and US (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent UTIs receiving methenamine hippurate against placebo or no treatment, and antibiotics. METHOD: The authors searched three databases, clinical trial registries, and performed forward–backward citation analysis on references of included studies. RESULTS: Six studies involving 557 participants were included (447 were analysed). Of the six studies, five were published and one was an unpublished trial record with results, three compared methenamine hippurate against placebo or control, and three compared methenamine hippurate with antibiotics. For the number of patients who remained asymptomatic, methenamine hippurate showed a non-statistically significant trend of benefit versus antibiotics over 12 months (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40 to 1.07, I(2) 49%), versus control over 6 or 12 months (RR 0.56, 95% CI = 0.13 to 2.35, I(2) 93%), and a non-statistically significant trend versus any antibiotic for abacteruria (RR 0.80, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.03, I(2) 23%). A similar non-statistically significant trend of benefits for methenamine hippurate for the number of UTI or bacteriuric episodes was found, and a non-statistically significant difference in the number of patients experiencing adverse events between methenamine hippurate and any comparator, with a trend towards benefit for the methenamine hippurate, was identified. Antibiotic use and resistance were not consistently reported. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to be certain of the benefits of methenamine hippurate to prevent UTI. Further research is needed to test the drug’s effectiveness in preventing UTIs and as an alternative for antibiotic treatment for UTI. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8136580/ /pubmed/34001538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0833 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Bakhit, Mina
Krzyzaniak, Natalia
Hilder, Joanne
Clark, Justin
Scott, Anna Mae
Mar, Chris Del
Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34001538
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0833
work_keys_str_mv AT bakhitmina useofmethenaminehippuratetopreventurinarytractinfectionsincommunityadultwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krzyzaniaknatalia useofmethenaminehippuratetopreventurinarytractinfectionsincommunityadultwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hilderjoanne useofmethenaminehippuratetopreventurinarytractinfectionsincommunityadultwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clarkjustin useofmethenaminehippuratetopreventurinarytractinfectionsincommunityadultwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scottannamae useofmethenaminehippuratetopreventurinarytractinfectionsincommunityadultwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marchrisdel useofmethenaminehippuratetopreventurinarytractinfectionsincommunityadultwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis